Tag: Social Enterprise

Insights from social enterprise founders and consultants on building companies designed to solve social or environmental problems through their core business model.

  • Your Business Is Not Stuck – Your Systems Are, with LaToya “Patrice” Seawood of Level Up Management

    Your Business Is Not Stuck – Your Systems Are, with LaToya “Patrice” Seawood of Level Up Management

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood, founder and principal consultant of Level Up Management, MBA professor, and Mighty Impacts instructor, joins Kim Allchurch Flick to discuss the theme “your business is not stuck; your systems are.” 

    Seawood shares how she started Level Up during COVID after leaving her job to care for her children and evolved it into a social-enterprise-minded consultancy focused on turning vision into clarity, structure, action, and impact, with emphasis on operations, workforce development, and customer experience. 

    She describes common challenges for entrepreneurs and nonprofits – lack of administrative knowledge, undervaluing operations until breakdowns occur, and the emotional side of change and trust – especially during growth. 

    She highlights tailored leadership development for marginalized communities, building workforce pipelines, aligning operations with purpose and values, and helping founders let go so the owner is not the system.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro

    01:20 Origin Story and Mission

    04:21 Community Needs and Systems

    07:22 Challenges and Trust Building

    09:48 Founder Passion and Burnout

    12:55 Client Wins and Optimism

    14:30 Connect and Systems Speak

    16:15 Serving Marginalized Communities

    19:07 Future Vision and Work Culture

    22:22 Values Driven Operations

    25:18 Growth Exposes Weak Systems

    26:43 Founder as the System

    30:25 Dinner Guests and Closing

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. Welcome to the Mighty Measure Podcast. Today I am very excited to be with LaToya “Patrice” Seawood. LaToya is the founder and principal consultant of Level Up Management, where she helps business owners turn vision into clarity, structure, and sustainable action with a background in human resources, operations, organizational strategy, and workforce development.

    She specializes in helping leaders build the systems and infrastructure their businesses need to grow. Well, LaToya is also an MBA business professor, speaker, and facilitator, who brings a practical people-centered approach to organizational challenges through Level Up management. Her work is grounded in a simple purpose, build people, strengthen businesses.

    Empower communities. Today we’re going to be discussing your business is not stuck. Your systems are, what a great topic. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Wonderful. Yeah. Thank you so much, Kim. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah, it’s so nice to have you here. And also I will add that you are also one of the instructors in the Mighty Impacts continuum that my company hosts as an educational cohort and asynchronous platform for learning about these types of issues.

    So thank you. Thank you so much. What has been your journey to this point and the inspirations that have brought you to now? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Local UP started during COVID, as with so many other companies, I’m sure. COVID was the time, we are all able to benefit in a way from the lack of noise. And I actually had to.

    Leave my job in order to care for our young children at home. And I decided to initially build this framework so that actually my husband and I could eventually use it together later. As the world started coming back together and waking up, I knew that I wanted our business to actually help fund nonprofits.

    I had started opening up a nonprofit. And really did not want to only depend on grants, but really saw a great opportunity to where business can really help funnel and support and grow and help keep nonprofits sustainable. So that led me to actually learn more about this concept of what a social enterprise is and how business can be a tool for both economic and community impact.

    Along the way, I met some great people, some wonderful mentors and coaches who really opened up my horizon, my i, my ideas, my brain. To really gain more clarity for what I actually wanted to build and what I really wanted to serve the community with. So the business continued to evolve as I paid attention to where people consistently needed help, and also to what brings me joy.

    So today a lot of my work centers around operations and I like to use the word functionality but particularly with workforce development and customer experience. I guess I would say that at the heart of it, we help people take vision that matters to them, and we move it towards clarity structure.

    Action, but ultimately impact, which is, I really think how you and I connect so much is this idea of impact and how do we make that impact? How do we communicate it? How is it known? And that progression is just directly aligned with the Level up signature framework. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And Yes. I remember when we met as well, you were a guest speaker at the Benefit Corporations for Good, happy hour a couple years ago in Portland.

    Yes. And the presentation you gave was so open, warm. And informational that I was really taken with that and introduced myself afterward. And yes, thank you. I’m the rest. Glad is glad you did the, a journey. Indeed. I can’t believe it’s been that long, Kim. I was counting and it’s like, could it really be two years?

    But it, I think it’s been pretty close to it, so thank you. What are you seeing in the community you serve and how do you serve and what are you seeing that people are bringing to the table? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Being involved in the community as back in Portland as much as I am, and still now also adding to it the community here in the Raleigh Durham area.

    I see so many good people with really good ideas. It’s really. Inspiring and heartwarming to see it all. They have dreams for businesses, for nonprofits, for ministries, and community programs. What I’ve noticed and seen is that a lot of times though those dreams struggle not because the people aren’t working hard or because they don’t have enough passion, but because they don’t have the administrative knowledge or the systems or the operational structure that can truly make them sustainable.

    And so you hear all these stories about businesses closing, or nonprofits closing, or even scandals that are happening. It all goes back to the structure and the operations of the organization. And that’s where I like to come alongside people sometimes, we don’t need more ideas, we just need clarity around what isn’t working around.

    The structure for what they’re trying to accomplish and the practical support that’s needed to move it forward. On the workforce development side, I also see people who want to work and they wanna work, they wanna contribute, but for whatever reason, they haven’t had the opportunity to develop the skills or even the confidence or the professional exposure that’s needed.

    And that’s partly why I developed my Thrive in Program and why workforce development continues to be such an important part of Level Up. I want to build stronger workforce pipelines, not just help people get a job. And these stronger pipelines, support those same businesses, nonprofits, ministries, and community programs that I mentioned earlier.

    So essentially level Up is the bridge that brings those two together and helps functionality take place at work, and skill people in the community to work at those places. And that essentially should bring economic wellness to the community. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, and that’s, I think, is so important because it sounds like what you’re doing is taking some groups that may not know each other.

    But are missing the same elements or maybe not being strong. The same elements that structures they need, and in a way bring it together. 

    To make an entire community stronger. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Yes. That’s the goal. That’s the vision. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Wow. What are some of the obstacles and challenges? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: The most.

    Immediate obstacle is my own season of life. A challenge for me personally is simply the fact that, I’m a mom first. I have three children, ages eight to 15, and so I’ve had to build this business. But in respect to that priority. So when time I look at growth opportunities, I, it has to be sustainable given my current limits of life.

    And so it’s not for me, it’s not growth at any cost. It’s all extremely measured. So that’s my number one challenge, I would say, and just in understanding and respecting and loving the season I’m in while I, my children are at home. The other challenge I see when I am speaking with people, bus business owners in the community.

    Is the fact that we know oftentimes people don’t recognize the value of operations and investing in operations until something isn’t working. It’s much easier to invest in what’s visible than it is to invest in the systems underneath it. And so helping to educate and just bringing awareness to that has been a challenge.

    I’d also say that this work that I do requires a great deal of trust. When I’m working with leaders and founders and entrepreneurs, this is their baby, right? This is their passion. And in order to bring someone alongside that and look into and potentially make some changes, it requires a lot of trust and, that just takes time to build. And it’s understandable why it would take time to build and you can’t rush that relationship. And so I have found that my pipeline, if you will it’s, it lasts. It’s a longer pipeline. And learning just to be patient with that has been, part of the challenge.

    I would say that I’ve learned that sustainable change isn’t just operational, it’s emotional too. And that’s a part of what that trust people are attached to what they’ve built. So part of my job is helping them navigate change, not simply just handing them a solution.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love how you said it’s also emotional ’cause people are throwing their hearts into this. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Absolutely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And what are some of the challenges and obstacles for them? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: What I have learned is. They often are very much caught and engrossed in their passion, right? Whether it’s a somebody who loves to bake and now owns a bakery, or somebody who loves to coach and now owns a coaching business.

    The, the service is the passion. The operational administrative structure that supports that passion often isn’t the strength of the individual and. Passion only goes so far and is only so sustainable if you don’t eventually have the right structure to support it. And so that’s the main challenge I see that they’re dealing with this understanding when is the right time to invest in that structure and to have that internal reflection and knowledge that.

    Passion isn’t gonna take them all the way, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: It’s so true. And it made me think of a, an example of a, a friend of mine who was ill and yoga helped save her, helped her heal through a 

    A chronic illness to the point where she created a yoga business that she then grew to hate. Yeah.

    And partly it was because. Because it started to feel like a ball and chain. And as you were talking about that, that’s exactly what I thought of is sometimes without that knowledge to keep something upright, to know when to hire, help, to know when to delegate it, it can become the thing you don’t want to do anymore.

    The thing that drags, drags people down. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: And when that person decides to leave. Their business lead the passion because of that burnout. That is something I feel deeply and that also I go back to COVID, but that’s so many businesses closed and.

    I don’t I don’t know. I, all I can say is I felt that that, it broke my heart to hear that continually, these businesses didn’t make it, these businesses didn’t make it. And knowing how hard those people worked to get to where they were, to not be able to be sustainable through that type of crisis, it just, it was.

    It’s kind of a motivation for me. I want my clients to be strong and sustainable so that they can ride through the market up and down. Now, obviously that was more than just a market down, but just in general to create resilient businesses, that is something I care deeply about. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And that helps an entire community and it helps people be happy.

    Exactly. Yeah. Do you have any examples and what makes you optimistic about what you do in your work and what you see out there? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Yes. When I first read this question, the first thing I thought of were my clients. I get to work with really good people who generally want to do good things and not just want to do good things.

    They are willing to put the effort in to make it happen, to take the risk, to make it happen, to just move forward with action. I’ve been able to help support management development. For people who are once outh, who are once unhoused I’ve been able to work on systems designed to support economic mobility for people experiencing generational poverty.

    Another client helping build an organization that will that helps to support like the whole human, so that people leaders can grow, perform, and build sys and build sustainable businesses and their careers. And then there’s the individual coaching ones. When I’m working with people one-on-one.

    Sometimes impact isn’t this huge organization transformation. Sometimes it’s just getting to watch somebody have their aha moment, as I gain clarity and confidence and then they’re, being able to take that next step. So all of that keeps reminding me that this work is important and continually makes me just so thankful that I get to do that.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love that. What are some of the best ways people can reach you and how can we help you? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: In terms of helping, I think it’s just, keeping eyes and ears open. One area I’m talking about more is called when systems speak. Systems are always communicating something and you learn a lot about an organization by looking at its operations and particularly the experience those operations create for employees and customers.

    So paying attention to that and keep me in mind if leaders wanna talk more. I’m also continuing to expand our workforce development work, and that includes workforce pipeline development, professional training, leadership development, and helping organizations think beyond filling positions to actually developing people.

    And definitely if there’s organizations within the network that are interested in that, I’d love to have a talk with them. But ultimately Level Up is about building people, strengthening businesses, and empowering communities. And so since those three things are connected, any, anything in those areas are really interesting to me.

    In terms of reaching out to me, I am on LinkedIn and that’s probably the best way to connect with me. It’s where I share a lot. About what I’m seeing and learning through the work, especially around leadership operations, workforce development, and how systems affect people. And then I’ll also give you a link that you can use, that people can use to connect with me and just talk through what you’re dealing with and see if there’s, a way I can help.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you. And you mentioned something that popped into my brain, and if it’s okay, I’d love to ask you a little bit more about how you’ve served unhoused people and others in perhaps those marginalized areas that haven’t been their fault. Because we’ve seen mass layoffs, we’ve seen a lot of situations that have been out of some people’s control.

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Absolutely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: What are you seeing there and how does Level Up. Respond and the other things that you’re doing. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: So I have been able to partner with community serving organizations who have been entrenched in the work for years, and because of that, they have a large amount of credibility in the community and they have graciously brought me in to partner with them as they do their work.

    And so for the clients that work with those who are unhoused, they’re already doing workforce development through internship programs and through training and now looking at that next step for their participants and for their staff, and, one of the challenges in that particular project is a lot of leadership development or manager development programs.

    They’re template. And our partnership really has worked out so well because I customize the program to meet the participants where they are. And with that one in particular, there was a recent example where we were doing a debrief on where we are so far in the program and realized that it wasn’t working for all of the people and needed to make some adjustments again to meet them where they are and.

    Equip and provide the support and the pathway needed to get them to where they want to be. And so that is one of the things I’m learning a lot through my clients who are these community serving organizations, is the ability to meet somebody where they are is how you have the great impact, coming to people who have been marginalized, who have had any type of barriers you wanna mention with a template program, it doesn’t work. And so while I know that other business models do that and they do it well, and that’s great, I just want it to be different. And so I work with leadership very closely to design a program that will work for their participants.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That tailored approach must be so important. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: It is. It is. And there’s a need for it. Definitely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. Absolutely. Where do you see the future of leveled up and thrive? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Just for it to continue to grow as I have, as I continue to work with different organizations and touch more lives with workforce development.

    I mentioned earlier about being the bridge between the two. I really want to continue to build this pi to build the pipeline. So on one side where. Equipping people and helping people get back to work in a lot of situations. And then I’m working with businesses to be great places to work, and so the more that we can do that, the greater economic wellness we can bring to the community.

    And I see that, that isn’t limited to the Portland area or the Raleigh Durham area. Any organization. That wants to have that kind of impact in their community is a great fit for us. And just looking to be able to sit, to do more good work and to continue to meet more good people.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And as a former employee along the way in my career, it really makes a difference. I’ve been with companies that did not treat us well. Did. Did not recognize potential that were very rote and had cultures that were focused on money more than people. And then I’ve been in the opposite, and the, the feeling is completely different, even though the work might be the same and the productivity needed is as much the same.

    So what you bring to that I, I think, is so important and how people feel at work. Can make everybody feel better. And it goes up to the consumer level too. It’s, we notice things even if they’re unspoken. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Absolutely. If I go to the grocery store and the checkout person is complaining to me about what their supervisor did, that’s a problem.

    That’s a problem. I, for every customer that comes through there, that’s affecting their experience and yet. You want that genuine dialogue, but what’s going on that your employee feels like that’s what they wanna share with your customers, right? It just goes, to me, it just continues to, there’s just always this opportunity to dig further beneath the surface.

    And so in my former corporate HR days, that example would’ve just been met with, okay we’re going to give that person a warning. Tell them not to do that. You can do that, or we can systematically look at what’s causing that behavior. And a lot of. What our employees experience and our customers experience know.

    There’s a lot of scientific research that goes into that and the companies that have invested in that have also done really well because they’ve created their operations to support the research in order to get the goal that they want, the experience that they want their employees or their customers to have.

    So that’s also what I look to continue to look into and grow and learn more is also the, that industrial psychology part of it. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed and as you know, I’m in the B Corps and benefit corporations world quite a bit, and it becomes a discussion point is like, what does it mean to earn these certifications?

    It means a lot. And on the employee side, it means it can attract people. And if it’s true and real and the values are being lived, it helps people stay. It helps people express things in their community. When you love where you work and you go, your parent going to the games, talking with other parents or when it’s.

    It seeps out in a good way. It 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: does. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Where? Where if it’s miserable, it seeps out as well. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: And that’s what I was just going to say. The values seep out one way or the other. And that’s part of the challenge when I’m working with leadership is we really need to have a real conversation about your own purpose and your own values, because that is what is being communicated whether.

    You know it or not. And so identifying what they are and then building your structure so that every layer of your structure represents that value. It, you don’t just create a customer processing or a customer onboarding process based on what the industry does. You look at that to inform what you do, but you also have to keep that end goal in mind.

    How? What do you want the customer to walk away feeling? What do you want your. Your onboarding process with your employees, to create, in how your employee walk walks away feeling. It’s all very in. It has to all be very intentional. And again, that goes back to, it takes the investment not only, not only a financial investment, but takes the investment of time.

    And a really deeper a deeper self-reflection. And I appreciate that. Not all leaders have that capacity. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. What happens when they don’t have the capacity? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: If I’m working with them, then. The focus becomes capacity building for the leader. If I’m, there, it’s just a, an a organization that you hear about on the news.

    What happened? Something blew up, there was a mess, and now it’s all over the place. And so then that’s where we, again you find out, there’s, you see the reach out for the crisis management and often. It requires, again, going back to initial purpose and how that gets baked into every layer of the organization so that the big messes don’t occur.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh indeed. And I like what you’ve said when I’ve heard you speak, it’s what looks like a people problem may actually be a systems problem and absolutely those things can change. But also growth exposes your current systems. What your current systems can no longer carry. Absolutely. Yeah. People are so head down, they can’t see the forest for the trees, so how would they even know until it breaks?

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Absolutely true, and that’s where I have seen most systems break is in the growth. And I’m all for growth and I’m all for meeting business goals. And I fact that’s what I help people do. I want them to meet their business goals and grow, but in order to do that well and to stay there, the system has to be built to support it.

    Because otherwise you end up with burnt out employees who complain to your customers or you have this horrible churn of people quitting coming on and quitting within 90 days or six months. And that it wreaks havoc on the bottom line because it costs so much, to hire people.

    And growing is a true test of whether or not your system is strong enough to support it and it’s also valuable. It gives you valuable insight to where you need to do some additional scaffolding. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And the last thing was that the owner should not be the system. And sometimes people start things and they make it up as they go along and they create a system and then.

    Sometimes it isn’t as good as it could be. Sometimes they can be great. It the how did, ’cause you work with a lot of entrepreneurs and 

    And startups as well as established companies. But what do you do in those instances where the own, the owner has been the, the creator of all things? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: That one’s 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: don’t quite know how to articulate the question, but it, it has to do with, when they get into a growth phase.

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Yeah. So the,

    the temptation that a lot of leaders face is to make everything in the organization about them, and they become decision maker for everything they become. The one who makes all the, who takes all the moves and bears the responsibility for their organization alone. And that only goes so far.

    If you want to stay, if you want to increase your impact, you have to expand past yourself and not. Just duplicating yourself, but looking at different perspectives and different skill sets. Understanding what you’re good at and what you’re not good at, and bringing in people who fill in the gaps that you’re missing.

    I find that leaders who do that have a greater field of vision in a way and can create their organization, build their organization in a way that covers more ground in a way that doesn’t have, these great pitfalls. And so it’s interesting, it’s like the way to hang onto your organization and the impact you’re making is actually to let go of some of the reigns.

    And that’s hard and I appreciate how hard that is for people. And so again, it goes back to the trust and the willingness to take risks. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Sounds almost like a metaphor for parenting as well, but 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Absolutely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: But at the same time, 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: absolutely. My son is about to be 16 and of course the conversation of driving is coming up and I’m thinking no.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. And yet at the same time, isn’t it wonderful when there’s a sense of delegating independence and decision making? So it’s yes. If the building blocks to that have been strong, then. Everybody’s happier and sometimes I don’t think some founders and people who are really just working and stressing about it, everything realize how you can do a good job with less stress too.

    So part of this may be the key to unlocking some of that and recognizing that in the end you’re actually gonna be happier for letting go of some of it. Yeah. In training systems, 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: you are absolutely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s a hard part though. It’s very psychological 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: again. Yep. I hope to, I, I plan to continue to dive into that and learn more about that so that it can better inform my work.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, and you are well informed and informative to people like me and I so appreciate it. So is there anything more you’d like to add before the final question? 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: I don’t think so. I think we’ve covered it really well, Kim, thank you so much. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Well, you’re amazing. That’s part of the reason why. So the final question is, if you could have dinner with up to three other people living or deceased, who would they be and why?

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: So it actually wouldn’t be anybody famous. I really would like to be able to have dinner with my grandparents. They passed early on. I say early on, meaning like before I started this company and my grandfather was an entrepreneur himself. And so looking back, there’s just so much I would like to ask and to learn more about not only who he was as a businessman, but who both my grandparents were as people.

    My grandmother passed when I was in my young twenties, and I’m sure like many people in my young twenties already thought I had it all figured out. And so now 25 years later, I, there’s some things I would love to know, and so my grandparents would be two. And then the third person would be my father who passed away as well, when I was just a very young toddler.

    I didn’t even, really know, I didn’t know him. But I, here he was amazing and I would love to talk to him. At this stage in my life, I would just really appreciate those conversations in a completely different way. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, what a beautiful and very personal table. Thank you for sharing that.

    And thank you for being here, LaToya. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Thank you. Thank you for having me and such great questions that you’re asking and really it was a really a deep dive to really think those things through and I appreciate the opportunity and the platform to speak about the great work that my clients are doing.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you. And I think what is revealing too, without even intending it in the beginning, but I have the best seat in the house, so I get to hear so many wonderful stories. Yeah. Stories are important. How people have built on their passion. How very few of us had a straight line weren’t 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: Oh yeah.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Weren’t born to say, I’m gonna do this hardly anybody. And the other thing is the question about optimism gets answered with every single person, and it’s. It’s showing me, and it’s like you said before with your clients, there are a lot of people that are doing really good things. Some are below the radar, some a little bit above the radar, but that knowledge that people are forging ahead regardless 

    Is so encouraging. 

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: It is. And especially we know in the world when we hear a lot of negative, crazy things. It is knowing, the, the good work being done, I guess in the trenches or on the ground, that is the motivator and it’s what inspires that goodness in you to go ahead and join in and to continue to do and to look at whatever you’ve been given.

    Or worked hard for, however you wanna look at it, but to use that to generate and multiply more goodness I ha I’m truly inspired by the work of others and the stories of others as well as yourself. And it yeah, I, if I don’t even listen to the negative news anymore, I can’t I listen mainly.

    To the motivational positive real stories that are happening with real people. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And I think we don’t always see it, but we’re not doing this in isolation. There’s somewhere, there’s someone else doing something that forms a concentric circle, like a Venn diagram. And so we are touching each other, even though we may not be aware of it.

    LaToya “Patrice” Seawood: We absolutely are. And that’s the whole idea of the E of ecosystems, right? And then building ecosystems. I love looking at nature for inspiration and looking at how different parts of the system feed and support each other, and that when that is done authentically. I think that’s when you see the great even greater impact.

    There’s no way I can have the impact that I do by myself. I’m just one person. And so it’s been, the people who have poured to me who have encouraged me, helped me see things that I didn’t even see in myself. It’s been the business partners who I’ve connected with and I’ve learned so much from.

    It’s been a whole bunch of people, right? Like nobody can say that they did it on their own. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. And you bring it forward so beautifully. So thank you. I appreciate your time. Thank you and have a great day.

    This Episode’s Guest: LaToya “Patrice” Seawood

    Headshot of LaToya "Patrice" Seawood wearing a tan suit coat and white top. She is smiling and looking at the camera with arms crossed.

    LaToya Patrice Seawood is the Founder and Principal Consultant of Level Up Management, where she helps business owners turn vision into clarity, structure, and sustainable action. With a background in human resources, operations, organizational strategy, and workforce development, she specializes in helping leaders build the systems and infrastructure their businesses need to grow well.

    LaToya is also an MBA, business professor, speaker, and facilitator who brings a practical, people-centered approach to organizational challenges. Through Level Up Management, her work is grounded in a simple purpose: build people, strengthen businesses, and empower communities.

  • The Impact Entrepreneur Breakthrough with Laurie Lane-Zucker

    The Impact Entrepreneur Breakthrough with Laurie Lane-Zucker

    Laurie Lane-Zucker, founder and CEO of Impact Entrepreneur, joins Kim Allchurch Flick.

    Laurie Lane-Zucker, who coined “impact entrepreneur” and whose upcoming book, The Impact Entrepreneur Breakthrough: A Field Manual for the Regenerative Economy (Sept. 1, 2026), argues for transforming an extractive economy into a regenerative one. Lane-Zucker traces his systems-thinking roots to environmental writers and his work on place-based education, linking cultural foundations, economic architecture (including B Corps), and systemic infrastructure as three nested layers needed for change.

    He frames today’s “polycrisis” as a single systems failure and introduces “real security” and the “prevention dividend,” citing returns from preventive investments like ecosystem restoration, hazard mitigation, and pandemic preparedness.

    The conversation also covers language shifts from sustainability to regeneration, mission protection through ownership models, the impact of the attention economy on community and place, and resources available at impactentrepreneur.com/breakthrough.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro

    01:48 Origins of Systems Thinking

    05:30 Indigenous Wisdom and Regeneration

    08:45 Polycrisis and Place Based Roots

    12:11 Three Layers of Change

    16:45 Real Security and Prevention Dividend

    25:03 From Sustainability to Regeneration

    27:50 Hope Through Certification and Ownership

    32:33 Mission Locked Ownership

    34:23 Berkshires Local Innovation

    36:24 Triad Local Global Thinking

    39:23 Attention Economy Threats

    40:51 Book Resources Pathways

    44:46 Starting The Impact Journey

    46:51 Monarch Butterfly Metaphor

    52:15 Grace Hope And Poetry

    54:22 Dinner With Adam Smith

    58:57 Closing Community Invitation

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Good morning everyone. This is Kim Allchurch Flick with the Mighty Measure Podcast, and I’m delighted to be here today with Laurie Lane-Zucker.

    Laurie Lane-Zucker is the founder and CEO of Impact Entrepreneur, PVCA global multimedia publishing platform serving more than 70,000 members across 200 plus countries in the impact economy.

    He coined the term Impact entrepreneur in 2011 and in the mid 1990s working with the educator, John Elder at Middlebury College gave the name, place-based education to a pedagogy he had spent years building as founding director of the Orion Society in 1992 through 2004. Where he worked closely with Wendell Berry, Terry Tempest Williams, Barry Lopez, and David James Duncan.

    He went on to found one of the earliest certified B Corporations and the Triad Institute. His new book, the Impact Entrepreneur Breakthrough, A Field Manual for the Regenerative Economy by Berrett-Koehler, September 1st, 2026 maps the architecture of an economy that builds value through regeneration rather than extraction.

    Learn more at impactentrepreneur.com/breakthrough. I am absolutely so excited for you to be here. Thank you, 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Kim. Thanks for having me. I’m delighted. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And I will admit that I am about three quarters of the way through the audio book. I own the hard copy of it, and that is because I went to one of your Impact Entrepreneur webinars where you discussed this book, and I believe it was an our webinar that went well over because everyone was so enthusiastic and also very, very curious about how to move this movement forward.

    So welcome. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Thank you. Great to be here. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: So what have been your inspirations and journeys to this point? You’ve got a, a marvelous history and a caring heart. What has moved you along the way? 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Oh, I’ve had so many inspirations. My book is filled with the voices and the examples of many of them.

    And I think my acknowledgements of the book is maybe longer than, almost longer than the book itself. A little bit of an overstatement, but I have a lot of people to thank for my path, my tra career trajectory the way I think about the world. And, the book maps a lot of the kind of the key moments and insights from that 35 plus year professional trajectory.

    It starts telling the story of one of my earliest, most formative experiences, which was a gathering in 1991. That I helped organize as a work study intern at Orion Magazine. It was the first gathering of leading environmental writers and nature writers. You name some of them, Wendell Berry. And although he was not in that particular gathering but Terry Tempus Williams and numerous other wonderful writers.

    And what I talk about in the book as far as how formative that experience was, it was so powerful to be in a circle of about, I dunno, between 30 and 40 of the kind of finest narrative weavers around the relationship between people in nature that were alive at that time. What struck me most.

    Was how they thought. They thought in systems. They, these are ecological thinkers and e ecology is systems. And that really and then having spent, then spending another, what, 13, 14 years, working closely with this community of writers, of scientists, of of policy experts who were and are focused on the relationship between people and nature and community that systems lens that is right at the core of so much of what they how they view the world, really impacted me so profoundly.

    And when I moved on, started one of the first B corporations. Then started Impact Entrepreneur and have been at that now for 15 years. Systems mindedness is a term I use to describe what the impact entrepreneur how the impact entrepreneur thinks is and what that, what I felt was really missing from a lot of the conversation ar around business building and impact finance.

    And that I felt was really essential for, to be right at the core of the conversation. So that’s some of, that’s some of my earliest and most lasting influence that I carry with me today. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love that idea of systems and when you talk I’ve also read some Robin Wall Kimer and how even hundreds of years ago there, the people that were on the land that understood the systems and how to be reciprocal and not extractive and how you’re bringing that forward to the modern day. What are you seeing in the community you serve some of the responses and what are others doing and what do you think is happening out there these days?

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: You mentioned Robin Walker Kimer. I’ve invoked Robin’s work at a couple different junctures in the book. I, I invoke indigenous. Knowledge systems regularly throughout the book because really what we’re, when we talk about regeneration, the regenerative economy impact, as I’ve seen it, I’ve al I’ve always through impact, entrepreneur defined the word impact as transformation.

    We can go into that if you want later. But invoking the Hani seven seventh generation principles the work of Kimer and others reminds us that many of the principles behind regeneration are not new. They’re, in fact, that’s thousands of years old and they exist all over the world. Ubuntu is a African principle around regeneration.

    So we’re in a sense, we’re remembering a forgotten way of thinking and. And, matching it to modern instruments.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s a beautiful way to put it. And because we are in a modern world, and yet these, these principles matter. They have worked. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yes, absolutely.

    The book is, in part a. Deep and profound celebration of a global movement of what I would call practitioners or impact entrepreneurs. A term I coined back in 2011 to, to give expression to a type of work and a type of thinking that I was seeing emerging around the world.

    And this is not simply entrepreneurs who are building enterprises, but people who are practitioners in transformation, so of the economy specifically. So entrepreneurs, investors, philanthropists, policy experts, academics. These are the people who are very much a part of our community at Impact Entrepreneur and are the ones who are bringing deep insight and an incredible amount of energy to what I feel is the greatest challenge of our day, which is to transform an extractive economic modality into a regenerative triple bottom line, impactful modality, however you want to discuss it.

    Much of the book in the examples I give in the tools that I share are examples and tools that this community of people have been building in recent years. In recent decades. It’s very inspiring to see I offer in the book. Kind of ways of thinking about this work, frameworks to better understand it and to also understand something I feel quite passionately about, that the poly crisis that we’re facing of social and environmental challenges, including the authoritarian of fronts or attacks on democracy.

    I consider that to be part of the poly crisis that includes climate change and wider ecological devastation. The brittle increasing brittleness of communities. This poly crisis is at its core a a systemic issue. It’s, and these are not separate problems. They are. Symptoms of a single systems failure, which is an economy that extracts rather than regenerate.

    So that transformation from an extractive to regenerative economy is, I believe the one of the most important things that humanity can be doing and that this movement is doing, and that there are amazing examples of this work all over the world. Talking specifically about work that I’ve done in the past, you mentioned in my introduction the work that I and colleagues were doing in the year, in the 1990s to develop something called place-based education.

    A form of e education, a pedagogy that uses the natural and cultural continuum of a place. For interdisciplinary learning to help get people to replace themselves in their homeland and become more deeper, more understanding participants in their places. Spent many years developing that. John Elder and I coined that term back in the nineties.

    Something really interesting happened. I moved on after my work at Orion and started one of the first B Corps and then in the early teens of this century the term place-based started emerging in impact finance. We started hearing about place-based investing. And that very much has r you know, roots in the, the work that we were doing in place-based education.

    But they are arose, out of the ground, at a distance from one, one another let’s just put it this way. Impact place-based education. Create cultivated soil that allowed place-based thinking to e eventually emerge into place-based investing, place-based funding and inform the community development, finance work that’s happening in many places around the world and through a lot of foundations.

    I take a lot of humble satisfaction in the fact in that, how that early work seems to have seeded things that have, can intersected with my later work in my career. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And it sounds like the work and the way you see it is very multifaceted, which is good. It means there are support systems growing and the finance part, the ecological part, entrepreneurs, innovators it’s encouraging.

    What are challenges and obstacles as you see them? 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: I think one of the most important messages of my book, I’ve been a field builder, you could say, for much of my career, both at, at the work we were doing at Orion, we had a the Orion Grassroots Network and we’re doing a lot of network building, community building, and that’s followed me very much into the work I do in Impact Entrepreneur.

    I believe that as a field builder, as somebody who spent much of his career building movements in the environmental and social justice realm and then moving in the second half of my career into a into, very much into the entrepreneurship, finance economic realm and thinking about things from a movement perspective because.

    The transformation of the economy from an e a extractive and extractive to a regenerative state is take, will, takes a movement of people of practitioners, the types I’ve described earlier. What one of the most important messages of my book reinforces is the how important is to work across a number of different levels to have that transformation actually take and to have lasting effect. And that, and there are a number of frameworks I offer for that. One important one is to think about change in terms of three nested layers.

    One, cultural foundations, the cultural foundations of change. Two, the economic architecture of change, B Corp. Certification could be is one of those. And thirdly, systemic infrastructure of change markets and market transformation. And you need to have all three working at a very sophisticated level.

    If you’re missing any one of those, if you’re missing the cultural foundations, if you’re missing or forgetting the crucial importance of storytelling, then the you’re undermining the other two layers. So you need to have all three moving forward at the time. And I feel that that is a challenge.

    It’s a problem for our space because it’s so easy to think about impact as just impact investing and impact investing as kind of an incremental shift on traditional. Extractive capitalism rather than something much deeper and more systemic. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: You frame that so beautifully, and I think it’s important.

    It also sounds like it’s important for you and us to reach policy makers as well, and legislators and bring that cultural storytelling into it. An example I’m lucky enough to live in the northwest. It’s not the only place that has some good things, that’s some bad things. But what’s happened recently, and it took years, is with tribal knowledge of the local tribes who were mostly the salmon fishery people, but also, they say that living on this land, not all tribes were salmon people. They weren’t all fishing people. They knew the land well. They knew how to trade well. They worked collaboratively. But there have been five dams taken down recently. One was in the news a lot, the Klamath system, which was four dams and one very close to where I live, called the Wild Boy Creek.

    And how it took about 20 years of planting and working together. But the indigenous knowledge was a big part of it. And the replanting of riparian species of plants so that the, the fish would have cold enough water and shaded water. And with all that coming into play, when the dams opened, they said the salmon, DNA and small salmon were showing up in four to six weeks.

    So for 60 years of degradation and ’cause dams are bad for a fish and they’re, therefore they’re bad for people. But it took that storytelling and that history and a lot of work and probably a lot of angst, but it actually happened and nature proves that healing and regeneration can happen really quickly if we just give it a chance.

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: A absolutely. And if we think about prevention rather than reaction one of the deepest rabbit holes I went into when I was researching my book ended up being the middle part of the book, part three, which is on which answers for me, the, a question that kept arising and that really is, has shadowed my work for 35 years.

    And that question is. What is real security? And as I looked into this from a kind of an impact economy with an impact economy lens, and I looked at research quite voluminous, research that exists across quite a few different sectors that we’re all looking at the value of in investing funding, preventative measures prevent rather than funding measures that would react to the inevitable disaster that’s going to come down the road.

    What I found was that pretty much across institutions, not simply governments, although government, municipal governments, national governments certainly hold here, but. It’s foundations, corporations, almost every institution, if you look at their budgets and their investments in what would be considered security related are reactive in nature, not preventive.

    And yet this, all this research that I was looking at, pointed to something that I call one of the greatest misallocations of funding on, on, on the planet, which is, a lack of funding of root causes and the dividend, the return on that investment if you invest in prevention. Some examples,

    first of all, just get your mind around this global military spending alone is $2.8 trillion globally. Okay? Most of that is reactive spending. Okay. That’s a, a very graphic number to hold in mind. Now, think about pandemics. Think about the things that really in the last five years have harmed you, Kim, or threatened you.

    It’s, in most cases, especially in, in the United States, it’s not the threat of a military invasion. Okay? It is a fi a wildfire. It’s a pandemic, okay? It’s a public health issue of some sort. It’s flooding. It’s, and these are the threats to real security. These are the pillars of real security.

    I, one of the frameworks I offer in the book are the five pillars of real security. And those five pillars are, ecological stability, public health capacity, economic equity, democratic infrastructure, and community cohesion. And again, all of these together are the sources of real security, I would argue.

    And that if you underfund or any, any one of these pillars is weak and potentially can crumble , it weakens the whole five pillars, all the other pillars together. Now, one of the, I wanted to make a financial argument around this, and I mentioned this term earlier, the prevention dividend. If one looks at ecosystem restoration, research shows that for every dollar invested in ecosystem restoration, again, preventative measures, you get a seven to $30 return on each dollar invested. FEMA hazard mitigation. Okay? Four to $7 of return for every dollar. So that’s $7 for every dollar for flood mitigation. Reinforcing building codes is you get $4 of return for every dollar invested.

    Pandemic preparedness, we have these numbers. We just went through a pandemic, right? It, the Jamil Institute has outlined that for every dollar spent on pandemic preparedness, you get a $1,102 return by hitting, by, by addressing these things before they happen. Okay, so this is a, this discussion around real security, I feel is a new way of looking at the work we do in the impact space and can potentially really shift the narratives that entrepreneurs impact entrepreneurs, social entrepreneurs who are developing solutions, often preventative solutions to social and environmental problems.

    It offers a new lens and a new layer of narrative that makes a very clear financial argument to people who are allocating funding that preventive matters, impactful solutions and enterprises are actually have, have a tremendous dividend that comes from them. If you shift your thinking around that question of what is real security?

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Wow. And of those five in the new standards of B Corp and others like benefit corporations for good, which is a verification, there is a way to measure impact in each of those. And it, the words might be different, climate, action environment you say ecology, but equity infrastructure could also be governance, health could be community and employees.

    There’s so many ways that I can see where this could intersect and interact. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: I gave a talk to the Super Crowd conference that Devon Thorpe put on a couple weeks ago. And it was about the prevention dividend. And I, when I was preparing that talk, I was looking through the other speakers and the topics of the conference, an impact conference of different solutions.

    And I look at it and I say, I could put every single one of those solutions into one of these five pillars of real security. And what I ended up realizing was what you’re, what that is, what that conference is, is a prevention portfolio for investors. And I just I’m just very excited about this, the reframing of the impact work because.

    If we can shift what I call the prevention ratio. So most institutions, when they do an audit of where their security related spending goes, they realize that between, usually between 10 and 20% of their spending goes to prevention. And about 80 to 90% goes to reaction if once you realize, or you do your audit and you find what your ratio is, let’s just say it’s 0.12, okay?

    Then you can start to measure what if we shifted that to 0.2 or 0.25? And then you can measure, because we have all this data on, ecosystem restoration, returning seven to $30 per dollar early childhood education, 17 to 13% annual rate of return you can match the increase in ratio.

    And actually. Numbers to, to what the dividend will be by shifting some of the security related, spending away from reaction to prevention. I think this, this is a game changer for the impact investing space and the impact entrepreneur space more broadly. More broadly. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And so then helping you and helping us as B Corps companies and others who are interested in or have specific areas in the space is how to get this message across.

    And I have a question about words. ’cause we talked in the beginning about how framing words and ideas matter and that words like sustainability 

    Have become so broad that maybe the potential meaning might be lost. And we also talked about how sometimes we think we’re doing something good, but haven’t thought past that first initial step and.

    One might be recycling. Yeah. And but recent data, even not so recent data says that recycling is not a panacea. That perhaps thinking in ways of how not to recycle at all by going back and saying, how can I not use anything that needs to be recycled? What are some of the switches? How could that be better?

    What do you think about in these circles that you’re in, in these conferences? How the words matter and how do people perceive what we’re getting to, which is how do we get to that prevention? Not just stopping something and thinking we were doing well, but really asking ourselves the question, how could we do better?

    How could we be literally more preventive? 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: You mentioned the word sustainable sustainability, which is a, yeah. A term that’s been at the core of our space for so long. Sustainability really is about accepting the di decay state of the natural world and the existing state of our social situation and trying not to make it worse.

    Okay. Regeneration is very different. It’s about saying no. We, the, the existing state is not at all satisfactory. In fact, on so many levels. It’s not looking very good at all for human prospects. And so we need to heal. Regeneration is about healing. It’s about using business, using levers of finance, using policy.

    Using education to heal, to make things better. That’s what this work is about. And so while I believe the word sustainable has been a useful term and has helped create a shift in thinking it’s still not anywhere near where we need to be given the reality of the world. And so that’s why the subtitle of my book is A Field Manual for The Regenerative Economy, not a Sustainable Economy.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And One Reason I’d love the book so much what makes you optimistic? 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: All the work I see. I’m a journalist at heart and an editor and I, with Impact Entrepreneur Magazine, with the other work I’ve done in journalism in the past, I’ve had the. Great benefit of being able to see work that’s happening and emerging all over the world.

    And our magazine tells those stories every, every week. And our community is filled with people who are innovating and supporting the development of those solutions. Again, all over the world. That is hopeful work. That’s hope. I don’t know of much more hope than that. Your work, I know as you’ve said, is very much in, in B Corp certifications.

    The sophisticate increasing sophistication of certification systems B Corp, first and foremost among them is a tremendous source of hope. But we can’t stop there either. This is a point I make. Throughout the book, especially in part two where I talk about enterprises that heal and where I talk about capitalist custodian and markets that reflect what matters that certifications are raise the floor, right?

    That we need to have every, every business needs to have this kind of rigorous assessment of practices and baseline for them to shoot for more. But another thing that we have to keep in mind, and I have a whole chapter on this subject, is that much of the success, the near term success of a business resides with the current owners and managers of a business.

    But that can always change and that will change when a business is exited. When the owners sell or retire, we see this. So in so many ways, Ben and Jerry’s, lots of different things. And then reactions to that to the problems such as what Ben and Jerry’s has been going through for decades now that have been emerged with things like what Patagonia has done with creating a purpose trust in a nonprofit organization to secure mission.

    My point here, and again, I have a whole chapter on this chapter, is on ownership. Ownership and the questions of ownership. Who owns the business? And how do you secure mission as ownership shifts? When original founders and managers shift, Paul Pullman was a wonderful CEO impact wise for Unilever, but then he left and things changed, right?

    So certification is essential. It’s a floor, but ownership and questions of ownership and all the legal innovation that’s happening around ownership that is really exciting to see is everything above that floor. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And as you’re speaking, it also strikes me that we have maybe a responsibility, but at least should have a curiosity as consumers and stakeholders to question that sometimes and say.

    We love Ben and Jerry’s during this ownership. Now, this new ownership, it seems that things are changing. That’s not to our liking. What could we do about it? We could also vote with our wallets, which is an another way of doing things. And I’m in a position now where my bank which is a small regional bank and is a benefit corporation, and it’s intimate enough that I’ve met employees who work there and it’s been great.

    Was just merged or bought out by a much larger bank. And one of my first questions is, will the benefit corporation status remain? And they don’t know yet. So part of that I’m thinking is, I don’t wanna give up on ’em yet, but also ask the questions along the way and say, what are your values?

    As you’re bringing this up it seems as, as we move forward and we’re optimistic and people are doing amazing things, there’s some winds of change along the way and. And we should probably question that or be aware or at least think along those lines and say, okay how do we encourage people to keep going down that path of regenerative economy or say, can’t support you anymore.

    There’s somebody else that I will go to. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Consumer pressure is always gonna be an important dynamic and change. I think that the, my chapter on ownership explores various different models of ownership where that are aimed at protecting mission over time and through the new eventual or possibility of mission dilution through exits and, new funders coming in and new board members coming in. Things like, cooperative ownership, employee ownership, as we mentioned with Patagonia, the purpose trust model. There are really interesting examples, not simply in the United States, but around in different parts of the world.

    Monon in Spain is a great example of a cooperative that’s been running for decades, very successfully. Nova Vita in Latin America. Another example there, there are a lot of examples of ways to lock in mission and so that it takes the, a question of future dilution out. It, you don’t have that.

    I think that this is really crucial. You can’t, certification is essential. Questions of ownership are foundational. And the earlier a business takes those up, ideally at formation the better, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: it sounds like the business equivalent of having a conservation easement on a piece of land to protect it.

    Yeah. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Community land trust. Another example of that I give in the ownership section, where the community owns the land and individuals own the buildings on the land. Yeah. Again there’s, and community Land trusts have been around for quite a long time. We have one of the, the first community land trust here in the Berkshires where I’m at.

    And yeah, the first community supported agriculture farm is based down the road from me here. Lot, lot, a lot of amazing work has happened in our very rural, beautiful area of the Berkshires. And I write about that in the book as well. One of my favorite narratives in the book is telling about this place a conference impact economy conference that we hosted here with Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors back in 2018. But it gave me a chance to talk about the amazing history from the legacy that w Webe Du Bois who grew up down the road here and went to the public schools and called the Berkshires, his ground of consciousness and as well as some of the other innovation Berkshires, the local currency that the Schumacher Center for New Economics developed also just down the road a lot of really forward thinking innovations have emerged from this little part of the world that I inhabit.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And you’re also doing something which I think about a lot local is emphasized in the 

    The impacts sphere and B Corps encourages us to support local stakeholders, and yet the world is global trade is global and you cover both local and global in such a beautiful way. And I love how you’re speaking about your local economy and where you live.

    I’m really encouraged by some of the things happening here where I live, which is we’re in the same latitude, but different sides of the us. But could you speak a little bit to that acknowledgement or understanding of your global viewpoint and gets protecting and helping people regenerate there, but also protecting and encouraging support of local.

    Yeah. How does that work in, in. Your thought process with impact entrepreneurs? Yeah. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: In the introduction you gave or my bio, you mentioned that I founded some years ago, something called the Triad Institute which was a think tank. And the, the triad refers to a triad, what I call tatic thinking, which is a way of thinking that is simultaneously deeply local or place-based, national and global.

    So three levels, and with all each informing the other, that to me is the most productive form of citizen engagement that we can have. Where you’re, you are. Sophisticated in all, all three levels. But it comes again with that, just as I was talking about the three nested layers of change for to the regenerative economy and the cultural foundations, the economic architecture and the systemic infrastructure.

    Just as cultural foundations are foundational, so is place, so is home, so is locality. And so much of the globalized economy that we do exist in has had a negative impact on not only local economies but our understanding of our, literally our place in the world. Our place in the world.

    And so place-based education is a pedagogy as I was, we’ve discussed. That’s in part aimed at revivifying, that connection, that relationship, that understanding that the continuum of nature and culture that defines each place is essential to our own self, our own identity our own wellbeing.

    You have to have that foundation and it really needs to be a deep one. Otherwise you’re just displaced from the world. Yes. From reality. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh. And like I said. It really needs to be a deep one, and that means getting to know local shopkeepers and thinking about school boards are one of the most local things that we could think about. And I admit to not considering things like that, but yet it’s become really important, all these intersectionalities of community and what it means.

    And I really appreciate how you bring that out in the book. And, but a lot of it just has to be about support. And I do find it interesting that there are some neighborhoods, even apartment buildings, where people might live next to each other and not know each other’s names. And yet in other places, community is neighborhood and isn’t it wonderful when people know each other’s neighbors and the kids grow up in that kind of environment?

    And that’s, that’s what a lot of historically. People knew each other very well. They were working together. And with other groups as well. And I just love the way you frame that. Sounds 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: like you 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: It reminds me of another part of the book that I explore in the cultural foundations aspect of the book, which is part four which is focusing in on the attention economy and how algorithmic takeover, the indefinfinite scrolling that so much of our social media, of our just online existence is aimed at at preserving, just keep you online, keep you looking at things that 10 minutes later you’re gonna forget you even looked at.

    But still it’s gonna, it’s gonna put money in the pockets of. Yeah, tech companies, so much of this draws so much of this so much of our attention is drawn away from place, from relationships, from communities. And that in, when you’re thinking of the movement from a re extractive to regenerative economy, caretaking our own attention, our attention spans is an essential piece of this.

    And I go deeply into that in the book and or try to articulate why we have to be very conscious of the the threats to our attention, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: caretaking our own attention. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s one to sit with. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s super important. What would you more, would you like to share and how can we, the audience help you?

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: I’ll share my book. It’s out in the world. It’s really 35 plus years of my experiences, my insights and my connections with people who are doing wonderful work. That, can be, I think you’re gonna you’ll share that in the information, but impact entrepreneur.com/breakthrough is where you can find all the information.

    It’s not simply the book though. I I finished writing the book over a year ago. That’s how long the publishing process takes with a publisher to, and that’s ex they expedited it. But I gave BA basically that gave me a year to develop a whole slew of resources around the book to support the book.

    So at impact Entrepreneur. Dot com slash breakthrough. There are, there’s a reader’s companion there for those teaching the courses. There’s a lot of different resources there. There’s the instructor’s guide. There are framework canvases that people can print out and use as they go through each chapter of the book to examine where they are in the work, in, in the transition, and and that, and those are directly linked to the toolkits that are exist at the, in the book, at the end of each chapter.

    The, so there’s just a lot of supplementary resources that exist to support the book. There’s so many tools in the book, so many examples that I felt the need to create a, a pathways section of the book, which is upfront, which. Tells depending on where, what kind of work you’re doing, whether you’re an entrepreneur, you’re an investor, you’re working in policy, you’re an educator, you’re a student.

    There are articulated pathways or suggested pathways through the book. Entrepreneurs definitely, you can start with page one, but if you wanna skip to certain parts of it for entrepreneurs, focus on the enterprises that heal, focus on the capitals in the market section.

    For those who are cultural workers, parts four and five of the book are very much supportive of that work. If you are a funder, of course, the capital, the work the chapter and work on capitals and markets is really important. So this book is not made. Simply for entrepreneurs, enterprise builders, it’s made for practitioners in the impact economy, and I’ve done as much as I can to make it as usable a resource as possible.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And in my work, I see this book as a tremendous resource that I can offer to others and helps improve. Because another thing I see is entrepreneurs are busy and sometimes it’s head down, and this sounds wonderful. And they’d love to be able to focus on ideas, and yet they’re working long hours running the business.

    And like part of the work that I love is helping people see that you can do the good values work as well, make the impacts and make it, it doesn’t have to feel like a second job. That there’s ways to in incorporate and create systems that help and innovators like you, this book is innovative and some practicality of it can help that future journey be a little bit easier.

    And that recognizing that running a company is hard work and being impact driven is work. It’s also joy and yeah, that we can make that trajectory more meaningful and that these, these helpful ways of doing it can actually be supportive. So I, that’s why I love sharing ideas like this that sometimes then it’s an aha moment where somebody says, oh, I could, if I incorporate this, it might actually make the rest of the work easier.

    The systems matter too. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. You talk about, you mentioned journey and it is a journey life’s journey of course but entrepreneurship is a journey and any activity within the impact space is such an important journey to be taken for those who are not yet on on a journey in the space.

    It can sometimes be intimidating. Where do I start? This is not a simple challenge. We’re taking ourselves to, moving from a quote unquote single bottom line to a triple bottom line operating system, find impact investing speak here is adding two more bottom lines. It’s adding complexity to it, to, to the process.

    And everything we’ve been talking about in this conversation is really suggests added. Complexity. The world is complex. We’re no longer going to be shunting off things like environmental degradation as an quote unquote externality. We’re going to internalize these things and we’re going to accept that is the proper moral role of enterprise.

    Now, that can be very intimidating for people who don’t know where to start and what, but, and the way I answer that is a couple different ways. One is by one of the companies I talk about regularly in the book is Patagonia, which made, a lot of headway news a few years ago when it could preserved its mission for eternity by transferring ownership to a purpose trust in a nonprofit organization.

    But it didn’t just happen. Overnight. I chart in the book 30 years of in incremental changes to make their mission more and more embedded over time. Becoming a B Corp, 10, 15 years ago was an important step in that and a step toward this. So iteration over time is very much a part of this work.

    Don’t expect you can do everything. No one’s perfect. We’re all going and everything has flaws and we’ll always have flaws, but we can improve, we can embed mission more deeply, more structurally as we go along. The other way I answer this question is through the last section last piece narrative in the book.

    It’s the code of the book. It’s called Breakthrough picking up the name from the title of the book, the Impact Entrepreneur Breakthrough. And it tells the story of going with a group of environmental writers. This is back 25 years ago or so to Michoacan Mexico to honor one of the great Mexican poets and conservationists, Omero URIs.

    And he took us to the Monarch Butterfly wintering grounds. I don’t know if you’re familiar with these, this utterly extraordinary natural phenomenon where most of the north American monarch butterflies travel to this few ac few acres in Michoacan, Mexico to winter. And you walk into this grove with not thousands of butterflies, not millions of butterflies, but, and not even tens of millions, but hundreds of millions of butterflies, all in a few acres hanging on trees so that they sway they bend almost to breaking and.

    I talk about the monarch butterfly, not simply about how collective these, these light, almost feathery creatures can create enough weight collectively to bend branches of trees, almost to breaking, but about their journey itself. That the journey that they take when the light shifts and the temperature changes and they feel it’s time to move.

    They start going north and they migrate all the way up to Canada and then they come back. But here’s the thing, they don’t all, no, no one butterfly makes that whole journey. It takes three to four generations of monarchs to create that journey. Somehow they know they’re coded to take that journey and to follow that journey.

    And when one dies and the new one is born, somewhere along that journey, somewhere along that. Distance. They know where to go, so it’s encoded into them. For me, this is a very powerful statement and works on many actual metaphorical levels for the path and the journey of the entrepreneur who doesn’t know where to start.

    It doesn’t matter. Find your starting point. Know there’s a community behind you with you and follow it and know that at some point you’re gonna pass it on to someone else or somebody else will pick it up. And that’s how I end the book.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s beautiful and thank you I think it encourages all of us to think, yes, it’s okay to start anytime and it’s okay to keep going. It’s okay to stumble. It’s okay to ask for help. It’s okay to be in community. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And it’s okay to keep going, which is. A really important part. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. And to understand this is a multi-generational shift that we are a part of, and that none of us will see the end of it.

    It goes, flat in the face of the traditional extractive capitalist, entrepreneur hero story. This is heroic. But the timeline, the perspective on what the task is at hand is very different than, start a business, sell it for a, a trillion dollars, and and you’re successful.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. You’ve added beautiful words to this podcast series. The Mighty Measure and the innovators that have been on before, everything you’ve said encapsulates part of their journey and a thing that they are doing that. Helps create this whole system. And one of the ones I immediately started thinking of, particularly since the Monarch butterflies actually die and regenerate, is there is a shift in our system of funerals, burials, things of that nature, which is a very big industry, makes a lot of money, and has been relatively toxic for, at least for western culture.

    And yet there’s an innovator named Katrina Spade who created recompose, which is human soil transformation, human composting. And there’s another company called Earth Funeral. And it’s the, it’s non-toxic. And what it gives back is like three cubic feet of soil that is being donated to land trusts and put in people’s gardens and literally.

    Trees are being planted. And 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And it’s almost like that, that forward journey of the Monarch, and hopefully these kind of ideas can inspire us in our business too. How we have to think beyond our own future and what a handoff looks like and shifting an entire industry. And it takes a lot, it takes a lot of effort to do that, but people are catching on.

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And that’s just one, one example of one industry and what you’re talking about is multiplicity of industry’s ideas, how to finance it, how to support it. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: Yeah. We published an article on one or two of these new funeral companies compostable funeral companies in the magazine, a few, a couple years ago now.

    It makes me, I’ve had this poem on my mind that’s been very meaningful to me and many others in the last week or so because the person who wrote it just passed away. Wendell Berry. It’s called The Piece of Wild Things. I don’t know if you know it, but it, what we were talking about, what we were just talking about, brings a new lens for me on that.

    The poem is a beautiful one. It is again called The Piece of Wild Things. And it goes I want to tell, no, that’s not it. When de it goes, when despair for the world grows in me and I wake in the night at the least sound. In fear of what my life and my children’s lives may be, I go and lie down where the wood Drake rests in his beauty on the water and the great heron feeds.

    I come into the peace of wild things who do not tax their lives with forethought of grief. I come into the presence of still water and feel above me. The day blind stars waiting with their light for a time. I rest in the grace of the world and I’m free. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, thank you. 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: And when you know that lying down where the wood Drake rests and the thought of, we were just talking about where we want our final resting place to be and how we want to get there.

    Of course he’s talking about a living person, but it connects right? It’s it’s beautiful and I believe ultimately that this work that people who are building. Enterprises, funding enterprises and teaching how to do this is our ultimately it’s a work of grace, a work of great hope, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: a work of grace, and great hope.

    I love that so much. I’m writing it down. Great. I concur because sometimes you, we can feel down and things are, can be stressful and yet the optimism and the people like you that are constantly forging ahead and encouraging others, that makes me so optimistic. Thank you. For the final question, this is the one that has nothing to do with any of the others unless you want it to, is if you could have dinner with up to three other people living or deceased, who would they be and why?

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: I guess there’d be two. I’m going to break the rules of your question a little bit here. The first is, I mentioned earlier in the conversation that one of the most formative experiences was a, a gathering in Cape Cod in 1991 that I helped organize as a 26-year-old work study intern of an a gathering of environmental writers who had such great influence over my thinking for the rest of my life.

    I would love to have, go back and do that again now. Now some of them have passed, some of them are still around, but, decades on to have that gathering again, to have dinner with them and to share my, what I’ve learned and how I’ve taken their inspiration into the work that I do and the and to.

    Share thinking of the book and to hear what they’re thinking about. So that would be one. And the other one would be to have dinner with Adam Smith. The father of capitalism who lived in the late mid to late 18th century 17 hundreds, wrote The Wealth of Nations. Which many consider the founding document for capitalism who has been considered by most people through the centuries.

    And today as this, paragon of self-interest and the invisible hand of the markets and, one of the, my favorite narratives of my book is the earliest story I tell of being a college student studying at Edinburgh University in Scotland, and taking the train to Aldi, Scotland, which is where Adam Smith wrote The Wealth of Nations living in his mother with his mother.

    And I tell the story of that trip and how something I brought to that trip, a general understanding or conventional understanding of Adam Smith and his role in self-interest and in starting extract, what it became, extractive capitalism. But the what I talk about is how different.

    What I was experiencing in Scotland at that time in ality, which had a really strong communitarian streak to it that was very different than what I was hear. What I understood Adam Smith was writing about, and it was years later that I came, I was pointed to an earlier book that he wrote called The Theory of Moral Sentiments.

    He wrote this 17 years before The Wealth of Nations, and it is about sympathy and puts the whole discussion of markets and marketplace within a moral framework. And that is one of the, the main emphases of the book is that you cannot have suce successful markets if they don’t live within a framework of human sympathy for others.

    This was completely lost. I argue that it was hijacked. In favor of those who wanted profit to be the main message of his work. And that is a real important what finding for me in the book was that, so much of what we think about is capitalism and its origins is wrong, is misplaced.

    So dinner with him, I’d like to talk to him about that. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, I’d love to be a fly on the wall. I would love to be the server in the room. That is fascinating. And I think it brings us back to words matter. It’s important to not always accept the first framing of an idea that Adams Smith had something behind that.

    And that money’s important, but. With empathy and with sympathy, we could do some wonderful things. 

    I love that. Oh, that must have been amazing. Is there anything else you’d like to say before we, we close up? 

    Laurie Lane-Zucker: I would love to if and when any of the audience has a chance to spend time with my book and they have thoughts, feedback, ideas that it might have inspired in them, I would love to hear about them.

    And so just reach out through Impact Entrepreneur, become a member of Impact Entrepreneur. We have a, a wonderful community all over the world. We have a lot of resources including like 150 webinar program archive with many, many of the leading lights and impact investing and B Corps and so forth.

    Just connect with Impact Entrepreneur and me and let’s start a conversation. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. Well, thank you so much. I enjoy being a member. This is Kim Allchurch Flick of the Mighty Measure Podcast. Thank you so much. Take care. Have a wonderful day. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Laurie Lane-Zucker

    Headshot of Laurie Lane-Zucker.

    Laurie Lane-Zucker is the founder and CEO of Impact Entrepreneur, PBC, a global multimedia publishing platform serving more than 70,000 members across 200+ countries in the impact economy.

    He coined the term “impact entrepreneur” in 2011 and, in the mid-1990s, working with the educator John Elder at Middlebury College, gave the name “place-based education” to a pedagogy he had spent years building as founding director of The Orion Society (1992–2004), where he worked closely with Wendell Berry, Terry Tempest Williams, Barry Lopez, and David James Duncan.

    He went on to found one of the earliest Certified B Corporations and the Triad Institute.

    His new book, The Impact Entrepreneur Breakthrough: A Field Manual for the Regenerative Economy (Berrett-Koehler, September 1, 2026), maps the architecture of an economy that builds value through regeneration rather than extraction.

  • Your Spending Is a Change Tool: Using Purchasing With Purpose for Impact-Led Buying with Rebecca Dray of Purchasing with Purpose

    Your Spending Is a Change Tool: Using Purchasing With Purpose for Impact-Led Buying with Rebecca Dray of Purchasing with Purpose

    Rebecca Dray, Executive Director of Purchasing With Purpose, joins Kim Allchurch Flick for a discussion about how spending can drive systemic change through impact-led purchasing. 

    Dray shares her journey from corporate hospitality to mental health advocacy to founding UK workforce social enterprises with open hiring, then moving to the US and launching Buy Social USA (later renamed Purchasing With Purpose) to simplify language and build a national network-of-networks connecting buyers to values-aligned suppliers. 

    They discuss the US “up-down” wealth gap, misconceptions that impact suppliers cost more or lack quality, and research suggesting most are cost-competitive with added benefits like talent retention and reputational value. 

    Dray describes tools and training to help organizations start small, improve supplier searchability, address logistics barriers, collaborate across networks, and support global verification via People and Planet First.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro

    00:56 Rebecca’s Career Pivots

    02:44 Building UK Social Enterprises

    05:56 Moving to the US

    08:39 Why Purchasing Matters

    15:48 Misconceptions and Value

    18:27 Tools and Training

    21:16 Finding Suppliers and Logistics

    24:02 Networks Working Together

    25:53 Habit Change and Advocacy

    31:36 Local vs Global Supply Chains

    33:08 Global Collaboration Basics

    34:05 People On Planet First Explained

    36:07 Atlassian Perks Worldwide

    38:08 Verification Growth Story

    42:10 Directories And Search Tools

    47:12 Optimism And 2027 Vision

    51:06 Signposting Not Scaling

    52:42 Verification Against Washing

    54:00 Calling People In

    55:47 Where To Find Them

    57:01 Dinner With Loved Ones

    59:49 Warm Farewell Signoff

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. This is Kim Allchurch Flick. Welcome you all to the Binding Measure podcast. And today we have Rebecca Dray. Rebecca Dray is the executive Director of Purchasing With Purpose, a national network of membership networks, connecting buyers with values aligned impact LED suppliers across the United States.

    Rebecca is a leading voice on impact led purchasing and believes that buying is one of the most powerful and underused tools that all of us have for driving real systemic change. She works with corporations, institutions, small businesses and individuals to help them see that where you spend is where you stand.

    The topic today is your spending is a change tool. Are you using it? How we can all become intentional purpose-driven buyers? I love this topic and I’m so happy you’re here. 

    Rebecca Dray: Thank you, Kim. I’m happy to be here. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: It’s good to have you. So what has been your journey to date and some of the interesting pivots or inspirations that have led you to this point?

    Rebecca Dray: I, how did I get into the sort of social enterprise impact led purchasing space is a bit of a twisty journey. So I started many, many moons ago working in the hotel industry for some well-known big corporate hotel brands. And I didn’t feel completely like it was fulfilling me. And I decided to study mental health counseling as a completely random aside, and I ended up shifting into working in mental health advocacy.

    And during that time. It was really obvious to me how many people were unemployed who had mental health problems, but they had nothing really stopping them from working now other than the fact that people wouldn’t give them a chance in employment. And so I decided to look more into how I could help people with mental health problems get employment.

    And I was at a conference and this man started talking about the concept of social enterprise. So running a business, the business sells goods and services, but you use the profit from the business to fulfill a social or environmental mission. And. This was in 2005. And I just thought maybe this is my thing, right?

    That I can use my corporate hospitality background and my mental health advocacy background and I can put the two together, so the sort of nonprofit and for-profit sectors together. And I set up a social enterprise with two other people. And we employed everybody and anybody who considered themselves disadvantaged in the labor market and had what we called an open door policy where we would basically say, if you feel that your, you have a barrier to being in work, then you can come and work for us and you’ll get a living wage and you will have support, and we will have wraparound services that will help you to work out why you are not able to hold down a job.

    And I’ve told this story many times, but the funniest thing wa well, the sort of funny slash terrifying thing was that two days before we o we were going to open, we were going to do an open recruiting day, and I went on the local radio and started talking about this concept and about what we were going to do with this business.

    And so then we get to the next day and we open up to start the open hiring and people were queued literally around two blocks. There were so many people waiting to come in to the open hiring session. We just thought, oh my God, what have we done right? Like this kind of terrifying, I think in our initial business plan, we said that we were gonna help 30 people.

    I think 120 people came to the open day saying, I need a job. I have a struggle. I have this barrier. And they were people with all, from all walks of life. And anyway, really long story short we went on to open eight of these businesses across the uk helping people to turn their lives around and get back into work.

    We were helping hundreds of people a year. And because the barrier for most people being in a job isn’t the job. It’s all of the things that happen in your life that stop you being able to hold down a job, right? Anyway, at the time I didn’t really know that the name of that would be Employment Social Enterprise or Workforce Social Enterprise.

    But I had this idea and I wanted to, to do it. And we started starting new businesses when we could see that there was a demand and an interest in a different area or a different kind of business. So we were running all kinds of different businesses, cafes and cleaning companies and gift shops and tea rooms.

    And we had a theater bar and all kinds of diverse things that employed people. And we also contracted a lot with local government and with local business in something that in the UK gets called social procurement. And so we had a lot of contracts. We actually were the preferential. Hiring support organization that actually took over the contracts that the local job centers had because we were so good at hiring and helping people retain employment who were considered like difficult to hire or difficult to place.

    Our workforce retention rate was the highest in the country. And so it was amazing, like our whole system of doing things and supporting people. So anyway, I, 12 years ago moved to the US and when I came here was to run a business in Florida originally. Which I still do, but when I got here I was curious about social procurement and I was like, why, what’s happening in this space in the us?

    And I couldn’t find anything. There was just nothing that was talking about this concept. And I was having meetings with people to explore and find out what was going on. I had a meeting with the Social Enterprise Alliance and various others, and I actually joined and ran the chapter that was in Michigan and I just discovered that nobody was really talking about this topic and nobody wanted to work on it.

    Social Enterprise Alliance actually said if you have skills and knowledge in this, maybe you should start something. And so I was like, okay, I will. So seven years ago, something like that, 2019, I think we started an organization called by Social USA and the whole point was to do social procurements across the us And nobody understood what on earth we were talking about.

    They’d never heard of social procurement. Most of ’em hadn’t ever heard of social enterprise. It was a complete anomaly to people like trying to work out what this concept meant and what it was. So we’ve learned a lot over time. We’ve changed and pivoted and had to read the room a lot in terms of working out what fits here and what we can do and what does and doesn’t resonate with people.

    And so three, four years ago we changed the name to Purchasing with Purpose. And funnily enough, just the simplification of the language helped people understand more. That they wanted to purchase intentionally and have impact in their purchasing. And so it’s helped us to change the language and to change the way that we were doing it as well.

    So trying to bring together networks all over the country. But yeah, it was a very meandering strange beginning, which I think is often the case for people that end up in this field. It’s usually, they don’t come into it in a straight path. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I do think you’re right. I think that’s, it’s been that way for me as well.

    And we actually met because of the Social Enterprise Alliance, or SEA Yeah. And I’m so appreciative. So while I’m still new to purchasing with Purpose as you know, my company is People and Planet First verified in a Purchasing with Purpose partner. And I wanna ask you what is your worldview and how is Purchase with purpose fitting into it now?

    And what would you like to see? 

    Rebecca Dray: So I would say.

    And I’m gonna say maybe let’s say US view for now. So I would say us view, we have a lot of people who feel really stuck and powerless and frustrated and like their lives aren’t really improving. And I guess a lot of the framing that we see around us tells us that that’s a left right problem, but I actually don’t think it is a left right problem.

    I think it’s an up down problem. I think that there are. Too many extractive businesses and people who want to accumulate wealth at the top and don’t want it to cascade down to everybody. And I think that money isn’t circulating, it’s not creating resilient local economies like it used to. The idea of capitalism has become something more ugly instead of what its actual roots were.

    And what the intention of it was right at the beginning, which was about building, strong resilient local economies and communities and having business that circulated money locally so that everybody could do well. And I think that’s, that has really significantly changed and is getting worse in many places.

    And so the gap between up and down, top and bottom is widening. The place in the middle is becoming even harder for many people. And yeah, so I think that’s what we’re trying to tackle is you don’t actually have to run a business in that way. That isn’t actually what somebody spelled out.

    And people like to talk about shareholder primacy and things like this, but it’s really a myth. It’s not actually the way that business has to be. Business can be good for people on planet, it can be good for everybody. It can reinvest in solving problems in its local community or for the planet.

    And and so that’s where we’re trying to go, is we’re trying to help people to see that in the US and to think about the way they run their business, the way they buy. And our purchasing spend is. Absolutely the best way to do that because it is so much bigger in number than our donating dollars.

    So what we buy versus what we donate is probably about some people say it’s 650 times more. I’ve seen other research that said it was even higher than that, right? So that the amount that we just purchase every year it’s in the trillions. And if we could just shift some of that to these businesses all over the country that have chosen to prioritize solving problems versus making two, three people richer, I think that society would be stronger from it.

    And and so that’s what we’re trying to help people to do and to see. And it’s difficult in the US because, I came from the uk. The concept of this type of business model is much better known, right? The Scottish government, I dunno if you saw this, but the Scottish government passed a bill just I think last week, maybe the week before, called the Community Wealth Building bill, which talks about, money that’s spent, should stay local, should improve things, should be with businesses that reinvest and solve problems.

    And and it’s all about, building this kind of social economy. But it’s much harder to find those organizations in the US because they call themselves tons of different things. So when we did some mapping research last year that I think you took part in, I think we had 30 different terminologies that people were using to describe their business.

    They’re like, I’m a regenerative business. I’m a cooperative, I’m a steward owned company. I’m a B Corp. I’m a social enterprise. I’m a fair trade enterprise. I’m, I mean on and on and on was the terminology. And so we also don’t have a legal structure, a single legal structure that just would help people find that business model, right?

    So you can really choose any legal structure in this country and then put protections in place to, to protect that long term. But people don’t really know how to do that. They don’t know, there’s not a lot of support out there for doing it. A lot of attorneys that help with business startup and so on don’t know about the different protections you can put in place.

    And so I feel like the movement. It’s here, it’s big. We think from the research, it’s well over a million organizations in the us but it’s finding them and getting them to self select and say, that’s me, right? So that we can know that this is something huge and that it’s a strong, powerful force of business within our sector that people can be doing business with and that they sell just about everything, right?

    So consulting services to toilet paper, right? And break room supplies through to T-shirts. So it’s everything and anything, but I think that the education piece in the US right now is it needs a lot more work and we need a lot more collaboration. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And it sounds like things are really murky for people to grasp it all and that some organizations and others work in parallel, but they’re not crossing over and working together.

    And what you say about the language is really true in terms like sustainability and impact becomes somewhat murky. And then I think, what do you think about this? I, there’s possibly another perception that doing something with businesses that are doing something as a force for good would also cost more.

    And even though Nielsen says, I think it was 2014 and 2017 or so, this study said that two thirds of consumers globally are willing to pay more for products and services. When a company has good values, what if, but it doesn’t say that you have to pay more necessarily. Pricing can be in parity. It can be more, sometimes it, I think it all depends.

    But do you think there’s an image that. Like organic used to be a lot more expensive. Now there’s a lot of leveling that’s happened over the years, but what do you think are the perceptions in the consumer’s mind about, even though two or thirds of the globe wants to buy from companies that have good values, what do you think are the obstacles and the challenges on their side, but also on the seller side?

    And this is B2B and B2C. 

    Rebecca Dray: It’s really a complex mix of problems. I think so and we’re trying to look at within purchasing with purpose, we’re trying to look at multiple fronts that we see as missing puzzle pieces. And I see it like a big puzzle. You need to fix quite a few different things and have them all working in harmony for us to be able to change this.

    So one thing would be, yes, a lot of perception, right? So the perception is they’re all tiny. The perception is that they all cost more. The perception is that they’re looking for a handout or, might not have a good quality product. They just are doing a nice thing. So therefore you should buy something from them and feel good.

    And instead of realizing that these organizations are selling to corporate government, retail, et cetera, the same as any other business, they’re just choosing to do it differently and have their model be different. They’re choosing that the majority of their surplus gets re reinvested into the mission they’re trying to solve, rather than going to a few shareholders or an owner.

    But it also doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t. Pay the owner, right? Or that you can’t make a salary or the, so there are lots of those misconceptions. We don’t have enough research in the US about some of those topics too, so that’s difficult. But I know that so the software company, SAP, that they’ve always been a really strong supporter globally of this type of procurement.

    They did a piece of research or they were involved in a piece of research in Europe a number of years ago, and I think they said that sometimes the cost was maybe 1% or 2% higher than another supplier. But the knock on impact for their company as a whole of doing this type of procurement actually more than negated the additional cost if there was one.

    So this research, I think, found that. In general, something like 95% were cost competitive or lower in cost. And that where it was hiring cost, just the fact that the company was doing this kind of procurement in the first place made the company itself better able to hire top talent, retain its staff, make its shareholders and customers happier.

    So there were all of these additional benefits that, that they were getting from doing this type of purchasing, which is why they were doing it. Interestingly one of our team, Jared who works for Purchasing of Purpose has created, and we are beta testing this tool called three T, which is helping a company to see the additional value that is created when they buy in this way, because I think it’s one of the missing pieces.

    So that for us is another missing piece, right? Is. Give somebody the data to be able to go to their boss and say, this is the value we create. Because it’s all of these things that you wouldn’t think of, right? If you are just talking, I want to buy this paper or this paper, and this one comes from Staples or any big box store, right?

    And this one comes from one of these businesses, these impact businesses, like generally speaking, you have to have the reason why behind it. And I think those are some of the tools we’ve been missing. And so we’re beta testing this new tool and I’m hopeful that that’s gonna help. We’re doing a lot of training.

    We’re actually just about to launch a series of 10 self-paced training classes to help people learn the essentials of how to do this type of purchasing. Why, how to talk to your boss about it or your colleagues about it. ’cause the other thing is that. You need to involve more than just the purchasing department, right?

    You, if you’re a bigger organization, you probably want to also involve PR and marketing and CSR and all of these other people in other departments that will have a knock on benefit from you doing this type of purchasing. So teaching people how to structure this, how to talk about it internally, how to put their foot in the water and get started, right?

    And another misconception, I have to make a billion dollar commitment. That’s like ridiculous and often fails, right? There’ve been multiple big companies that have made billion dollar commitments and then they just slowly stop talking about them because they can’t achieve them. And so we encourage people, no, start small, right?

    So buy one thing in one product category. Change out some break room supplies, change out, get the next time you’re doing an event, have your printing done by a social enterprise, right? So things like that that are small, incremental steps that you can take. And then you feel out the relationship with this new supplier, right?

    And you see, oh it’s amazing quality. It costs the same, it was delivered on time and we helped all of these people, for example, to get a job or to come out of poverty or homelessness or whatever. And so small steps is another piece. I’d say that the piece around not being able to find them is huge, huge barrier.

    The reason that people go on places like Amazon and that isn’t. B2C anymore, right? Amazon is used by schools and colleges and during COVID, Amazon’s B2B sales went through the roof, right? Because they were able to force discounts onto sellers. They were able to do all of this sort of, huge scale purchasing that was easy for the buyer.

    We don’t have something comparable to that. And part of the reason we don’t is logistics. So we’re trying to work on, and we have been for many years on a national logistics cooperative that could have warehousing, fulfillment services delivery and last mile delivery in a number of hubs around the country so that all of the social enterprises could buy their logistics services from this one huge cooperative.

    Because right now, how are you gonna. Compete with the buying power that Amazon has, right? There’s just no way. And or you’re going to buy things from like our directory or marketplace, but each vendor or seller that you’re buying from is gonna package things individually and ship them individually to you because they’re not all sitting in a huge warehouse that you know is owned by Amazon, just down the street from you, right?

    So there’s all sorts of different barriers that we are incrementally trying to work on, and I think helping the enterprises to do things collaboratively and collectively, helping them to get collective visibility and for people to understand what they are and what they do and why should I make this switch.

    But also helping them with all of that reduced overhead that a lot of these huge, they’re not monopolies, but they might as well be right. A lot of these bigger companies. Who are purely making Jeff richer, right? Is essentially they’re buying power. They’re storing power. Their delivery power is, you can’t compete right now if you are, if you’re not in that space.

    And so a lot of these enterprises end up selling on these marketplaces and losing 30, 40% of their sale. It’s huge, right? If you are already have got an additional overhead because you chose to solve a problem in the world that we are facing in our society or in your community, you don’t need that additional overhead of the 30% of your profit going out the window, right?

    So I think there’s so many different facets. The other thing is around getting all of these different networks of enterprises to work together. So the reason we became purchasing with purpose instead of by social USA, was as by social USA. We were going out and searching for sellers, suppliers for individual buyers, and quite often we would find them through networks, right?

    So like Kim you are part of several networks. You mentioned Social Enterprise Alliance. You’re a big part of the B Corps space. You are part of all sorts of different networks, right? But the networks weren’t necessarily working with each other again, because of terminology. Oh, you are different from us, right?

    You are B Corps and we are social enterprise. Okay, we have more in common than we have a part, right? And so if we have similar values, if we have similar way of looking at the world, we should be working together, not apart. And I understand why it happens, but I think there needs to be a tide turning of all of these similarly values aligned organizations coming together and collaborating.

    And that’s essentially what we’re trying to build with purchasing with purpose. And we have about. 30 something networks now who are part of the collective, but we’ve found more than 250 across the country. So it takes time to get people to work together, trust each other, want to collaborate. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: It does.

    And I also heard a statistic, and it was around COVID when the B Corps applications exploded, but also the shift went from B2C business to consumer approvals to more B2B business to business. So we found that very interesting and that hopefully lends something that more people can learn to work with purchasing with purpose.

    And the other thing, and this is just personal, I notice how hard, maybe not hard, but slow it can be to change a habit. And my purchasing just personally has been one of, and it took a. A while, but I wanna eliminate plastic as much as I can, or at least not buy with plastic. So an example is with cleaning and laundry, I managed to completely eliminate plastic packaging From those two things.

    Those two things, yes. Not just items, but the whole idea of cleaning and laundry. No more plastic, but it takes a while. But when, as a consumer going into a grocery store, it used to be, I want this. I want my favorite peanut butter, or I want this. And now I look at it and it took some brain training, like several repeats to say, I want the best packaging and I will find the product.

    But the first decision point is the packaging, not the product itself. So for instance, one of them is, I love peanut butter. I love a certain brand. They used to be in glass, now they’re in plastic. I don’t buy it anymore. I look for the plastic ones. Yeah. But it takes some time. So I want to give people grace, including myself, that it is a habit forming idea.

    But leading the decision point with something different than the product itself is training the brain. But I find it really liberating once I get there because it, it narrows the scope of how many choices there are to pick the one that fits everything I wanna do and my values and my lifestyle.

    Rebecca Dray: Yeah I think that’s really interesting and it’s something that. We’ve been taught that we need everything now as well, right? So we’ve been taught I need it tomorrow, right? I want it to come overnight. But we don’t think about the cost of that. And I say we, lots of people do think about that, right?

    Lots and lots and lots of people do think about it. However, the system for choosing something different is not yet developed enough to be able to compete and make it easy. And so I do think there are lots of people, particularly younger generation, my kids’ age, in their twenties, really care about this topic and as they should, because we are, as the older generation messing up the planet that they’re gonna try and live in, right?

    And so it’s thinking ahead for what we’re leaving behind and what do we want? I say vote with your wallet, right? It’s like what do you want the world to look like? And if you’re not going to help create it, then you are essentially voting in the other direction, right? Because you have to make choices.

    And so the other thing, people might say to me that’s easy for you to say, right? You can afford to make the choice between this thing and this thing. And I would say, yep, that’s very true in parts of my life, I have disposable income where I can think about making a choice to buy something different, to wait for it three days, whatever.

    But I think the thing that everybody can do is be an advocate, right? So if you can’t do it yourself, think about all of the places you touch, where you could. Impart the knowledge and ask people to do better. What about your kids’ school? What about colleges or hospitals in your local area? What about your place of worship?

    What about your workplace? What about your local government office? There are all of these different places where any of us, what about other people you meet and your friend circle and your family circle? Can we just help each other to see what’s out there, to learn to share this knowledge?

    Funny, strange story, but I was sitting in the at a hotel lounge last night waiting for my partner to come in on a plane that was delayed and he got chatting to this man opposite me who’s in a completely different field of work for me and. We start talking and eventually I start talking about social enterprise.

    ’cause that’s my favorite topic and and purchasing. And he was just like, this is so fascinating. I never thought about it. And then he starts telling me things that his company is doing. He’s like, wow, we have a special program where we support veterans, for example. I’m like, fantastic.

    You could buy from this social enterprise that’s in Detroit that employs homeless veterans, right? And he’s like, no way that exists. It’s like, just, it’s a conversation, right? I wasn’t making him buy something, but he’s now aware and he’s like, my wife’s gonna love this. And, and so that’s how you spread the word you, if you are not able to do the purchase yourself for whatever reason.

    You can tell somebody else that can do it, and so that is something that every one of us can do that’s free. Is inspire change in others. Talk about this because we want money to circulate in our community. We don’t want it to flow straight out the door again. That’s one of the divisive things that’s happening in this country right now.

    And it’s not about politics, right? It’s about this massive wealth gap and this sort of extractive behavior rather than regenerative behavior that we want to see more of in the world. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And also we all think, a lot of us think about purchasing local. The world is beyond local. And the way I look at it is, yes, supporting local companies is very, very important and keeping money where it can be and build a local economy.

    And yet even local companies that have usually have a product wine might be one of ’em. It’s the grapes are grown locally, the people are hired locally, but the corks and the barrels are in France or Portugal. So there’s still this interconnectivity that is international as well. The supply chain for a lot of us is still global and even when they’re, we’re choosing to purchase local, there’s usually a tentacle or some kind of a web that is international.

    It’s the world we live in. And how do you speak to that with purchasing with purpose? 

    Rebecca Dray: We work alongside organizations like ours all over the world all the time. I spend a lot of time on calls and emails and WhatsApp messages and so on with colleagues in so many different countries. Interestingly, this whole topic of impact led purchasing is much, much bigger outside the US than in the US right?

    I was talking earlier about how we called ourselves bi social USA. One of the reasons we chose that is because there’s a bi social Canada right across the border, right? I’m 45 minutes from Canada. And but the name didn’t track here in the US it totally tracks in Canada, right?

    They’re very successful doing what they’re doing. And working with, for example, local government on when new construction happens, making sure that the purchasing for that, those construction projects happens with these social enterprises So internationally. We have to and want to, help each other learn, share knowledge trade that, that’s how we all thrive, right?

    I think at the moment we’re not particularly a popular destination for a lot of people. And so that’s, that’s fair. So I don’t see us doing as much of that right this moment, but I think even, so I was on a call yesterday with colleagues who were in Brazil and we were talking about working across, from Brazil and the US and Canada.

    And so that stuff is happening all the time. We briefly touched on the verification people and Planet First and Europe people and Planet First verified organization. There are, multiple organizations all over the world who are getting verified. The reason that people on Planet first started as a global participatory verification system was because of this issue of not being able to see these organizations easily globally.

    So the motivation behind it came from consultations with network leaders in, I think 35 countries or something like that, saying, is there a minimum standard that we could all agree to across the world that is, you might call social enterprise and I might call the social and solidarity economy and somebody else might call a fair trade enterprise and et cetera, et cetera.

    Is there a standard that we could all agree is the minimum bar for that and could we then. Offer a super affordable way of verifying those organizations that literally just covered its own cost, right? It’s not there to extract money from the system. It’s not there to become prohibitively expensive, and that can work across any legal structure or lack of legal structure in many countries, right?

    So many, many countries don’t have, the US doesn’t have a legal structure that exactly fits all of the criteria. So that’s how people on Planet First came about. And purchasing the purposes, one of the three steward organizations that ensures that the standards are being upheld globally and we donate a lot of people time and money to help build it and grow it and expand it, but.

    But yeah, that has 85 partners, I think across 132 countries now working together on trying to get these enterprises visible, verified, and work on things, benefits for them. So Atlassian software company just acknowledged that if your people on Planet first verified, you can have free Atlassian software.

    That’s amazing. That’s like such an amazing win. If you are any verified enterprise that uses Jira or, I’m trying to remember the name of all of their different products, right? But Trello. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Trello is one 

    Rebecca Dray: of the Mio, I think. Yep. So yeah, so there’s, that’s an example of collaboration internationally.

    The conversation with Atlassian was started by one of our partner organizations in Australia. And they said, we want to offer this in Australia. And we said could we offer it everywhere? Because these enterprises are everywhere. And they’re like, yeah, that’d be great. And so here they are.

    Now they’re listed in the supporter directory for people and Planet first supporters that want to offer things of benefit to verified enterprises globally. That’s a great example of participation across multiple networks all over the world working together. And it doesn’t always have to be about trade.

    Sometimes it’s about opening up a benefit or an opportunity or visibility for enterprises in a way that doesn’t exist right now. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And people in planet first verification, at least in my small worldview, is becoming. Increasingly noticeable. People are recognizing that beautiful logo, and I see more and more companies that are going for that first, they may verify as other things as well.

    And the other beautiful thing I believe about people in Planet First is that it can organizations can get that as well. Like nonprofits absolutely can do it. 

    Rebecca Dray: Yep. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And the environmental climate piece is included as well, because I don’t think we can separate social and environmental very much because it, everything environmental affects us and it can affect economies and vice versa.

    So I’m glad that that’s there as well. But what has been the people in Planet First verification growth? ’cause it seems like it’s a reasonably new verification among many certifications. It is verifications. 

    Rebecca Dray: It is. So it came out in 2019, but as a sort of not a test case, but almost, we were running it to see how it would go.

    And it actually had a different name, it had a different badge. It, and interestingly in the US I said I don’t think this is gonna work in the us. For a start, it used the word social enterprise in the badge. And so I said, yeah, what we are finding here in the US is people don’t know what that is, so we’re going to lose all of these people that, that sort of would love the concept, but they don’t know the wording, the terminology.

    And we actually brought in branding firm in the US and said, can you help us to create a brand for this that, that we can move to just in the US And originally and they came up with. Through lots of consultation with us, what’s important? What are you doing? What’s the, and we said essentially we had come up with the name of Will.

    All of these businesses put people on planet first. They put people on planet before profit, right? So they make a profit, but they all put it first. It’s not an afterthought. They’re not just considering it, it is central to their existence. And they came up with the badge for us, with the word first, slightly to the left and first, and it was great.

    And now we’re seeing about 20 to 25 organizations verified every month, which which is great because, I think when the B Corps badge started. I remember somebody told me a statistic that was like, after five years there were 75 B Corps certified. And I was like, okay, so we’re in year three and we’ve got over a thousand.

    And that’s amazing, right? We’re doing really well. And I think, so I think it’s resonating with a lot of people from a lot of different backgrounds. And partly because it doesn’t use any one terminology, it just talks about what we try to do. It does have a catchy badge that I have stamp all over just about everything that I wear and walk around with and have on my water bottle and my laptop and my t-shirt and, things like that because I love the logo and people actually often ask me about it.

    What does that mean? What is it? And they’re always curious. So yes, I think it’s getting good pickup and the more partners and networks we can get involved in promoting it and supporting it, the more it’ll grow, I think. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I believe so as well. And some companies have one certification or verification.

    Some have many 

    Rebecca Dray: Multiple. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. And yeah and I just don’t always know how people prioritize or what to think. But the fact that it is possible to have many, and maybe that’s one of the things that will bring people together more is recognition of what these verifications are doing for companies, but even more importantly, what they’re doing to the networks or for the networks, for the consumers, for the partners who are buying for the supply chains.

    And the more recognition, the better, so that people can think, I need to have something printed. I will only print from a verified. 

    Rebecca Dray: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Company that cares about the planet and people, however they talk about that, whether it’s social enterprise or not, but putting that choice first. It’s not that the printing is needed first because printing is ubiquitous.

    We could get it anywhere. Yeah. But putting the value of the type of company from which we will purchase that first, that could catch fire and make a big difference. Yeah. But I still think the terminology gets a little bit tricky and the lack of searchability for things is an, it’s just something that is still tricky.

    So one of the things I would dream of is what’s a great online directory where somebody could just go in and search? And what do you think are possibilities of that, of improved searchability? 

    Rebecca Dray: So we’re building directories now. We have a Purchasing with purpose has a marketplace and a directory.

    Of the enterprises that we work with in the US Good Market Global has the has a much bigger directory and marketplace of organizations all over the world. The People On Planet First website has a directory of all of the verified enterprises around the world, but I think it will become more and more, and more.

    I think it needs to like that visibility piece is really important. One of the things I love about what we do is we’re not asking people to move away from a network. We’re asking the whole network to join and be part of this collaborative, right? So we’re not, we are not Purchasing with Purpose is not a membership organization.

    It’s just a collaborative of people who want to work together on purchasing opportunities and visibility. So we are terminology agnostic. We’re network of not agnostic. We’re not saying this one’s better than this one. We’re saying these are all values aligned. And I think the more we build that trust base with people within different networks, and that could be local, right?

    It could be a city directory. It doesn’t have to be something national or international or statewide or whatever. It can be small. The other thing that we are doing this year is we’re changing our website and our searchability functions so that not only could you look at going back to this discussion we had earlier, right?

    Where are all of the places that I spend money or make choices about what I buy? We’re going to change our search tools so that. You can find a map in the place where you are, but you can search under multiple categories. So not just what are the goods and services I can buy? Who am I hiring? There’s tons of enterprises across this country that focus on workforce development. Back to my story of what I did in the UK 20 years ago, right? 25 years ago, we were in considered a employment social enterprise, right? There were loads of these organizations in the US particularly that focus on supported employment for people with disadvantaged.

    Mental health challenges, physical disabilities, learning difficulties homeless people, people who’ve been previously incarcerated, PE people who have been trafficked or, had domestic violence and things like that. There’s so many workforce focused social enterprises that sell amazing goods and services.

    But they also have people who are learning to get their confidence back and their skills back, who then move on into other employment. So many of them broker hiring. What if you can search for your next hire from one, from this directory as well? What if I can find a restaurant or a bar or an art exhibition or a piece of music I want to listen to that’s within this values, right?

    That’s reinforcing and helping me feel attached to this community of value. And I think there’s more and more of that. So we’re gonna build out that functionality and we’re also gonna have a recommendation tool so that you could be out and about in your community and maybe you end up somewhere.

    I remember Danielle who works in our team. Text me one day and was like, I’m in this different city and I just went in this cafe and it turns out that it’s a social enterprise and they’re working with women who have been being trafficked, right? And being victims of abuse.

    And she’s like, that’s amazing, right? And so she’s sending me a photo of them and it made me think we want everyone to be able to send us a photo and say, here’s one, right? Here’s this organization. So that you can recommend, because I think word of mouth and recommendation it gives people agency to take action and to be an advocate for what it is we’re trying to see in the world.

    So yeah more ways to have that happening and then connecting that to others globally doing the same thing. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: As a visual thinker, I can just see MindMeister maps in my head. Yeah. But some people aren’t always that visual. But you’ve said advocacy twice, and I love that word. Especially when it, we really feel it.

    Advocacy is a force of nature. It can be so amazing. And the other thing is, it sounds like this is bringing you full circle back to some of your origin story about originally helping people who weren’t considered hireable and showing that Absolutely. They have, they are. And what a wonderful thing to do.

    So what makes you optimistic at this point? 

    Rebecca Dray: I think people make me optimistic. Generally speaking. I think most people are good people and they want to do good things. I think many people feel scared, frustrated, stuck, unsure. Uncertain, so what I am seeing is that we’re offering tools, right?

    Tools for people to be able to take that and take a little piece of power back and have a pocket of positivity in their day where they can feel like they’re helping and they’re contributing and so on. Doesn’t have to be financially, it can just be in spreading the word in advocating and talking and sharing.

    So I feel really positive that people want this. I’ve seen more networks wanting to work together than ever before which is fantastic. Actually. I don’t even know if I should tell you this, but we’ve been talking about, the idea of maybe doing a collaborative conference in 2027 or like a conference of conferences, right?

    So like all of the values aligned networks coming together in one place, probably a convention center, having an expo of all of the different types of businesses, no matter what they call themselves, but they’re all values aligned, right? All the buyers that buy from all of these organizations cross populating across all of the other organizations.

    Like to me I put an email out into our networks and said, what do you think? Is this a good idea or a bad idea? And I was shocked at how many networks thought it was great idea. And we’re having a meeting next week to start seeing if we can work it out. And so that makes me optimistic that people want this and they’re looking for what they can hold onto and affect change with.

    And I think that’s what we’re building. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Count me and I’m excited about that too. And it also. It’s important to recognize that this is across so many sectors. It isn’t just consumer goods. This is big. How the consumer goods get to us. It’s also about services. It’s about support. It’s about so many things.

    And I think that the thing that, as you’re talking also gives me optimism is there are many people who are doing this under the radar, but knowing that there’s such a large quantity of people who care makes me really optimistic and not feel so alone. And 

    Rebecca Dray: yes, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And I actually don’t feel alone because I’m in groups that are like valued.

    But I also have a lot of optimism in the innovators because there were changes we couldn’t have made maybe 20, 30, 50 years ago. Because the innovation wasn’t there yet. But sometimes solving a problem creates an innovation. Like somebody solved my laundry and cleaning problem by doing something with no plastic and all plant-based, and it works.

    It wasn’t, those things weren’t there before, except, in my grandmother’s time with, with inconvenient things. And I think that’s another thing is answering things in a way that people, the uptake will be good because I think people still need some convenience in their lives, and I’m willing to make changes that are inconvenient.

    Yeah. But maybe not across everything, every day, all the time. And. But giving ourselves the opportunity to find, and I think this is something that you’re solving with purchasing, with purpose and people in planet first, is making the searchability easier. Because if we want to do good, but we can’t find a way to do it, that becomes very frustrating.

    It’s a roadblock we give up and people have lives to lead, but there’s other things we have to do. But to make it searchable is such a gift. Yes, 

    Rebecca Dray: It is. I think. So I’m sure that the people that work for me at purchasing Rep Purpose find it very strange in that I say to them all the time, I don’t want us to grow.

    I really don’t like genuinely, we’re currently a team of four. We may at some point become a team of five. That’s plenty. What I want to grow is all of these grassroots networks that are working on the ground with people. What I want to grow are the enterprises themselves, right? Everything we do, and I always talk about this, we should be signposting, we should be connecting dots.

    We should be listening to people and going, oh, I know somebody else whose needs to work on that or is interested in this thing, or, and connecting people together. So I see purchasing with purpose as more of a sign poster. Making things visible, connecting dots, just sharing knowledge, getting people to share with each other.

    That’s genuinely where I want us to be. Because it doesn’t exist right now in the way that it should. And actually that makes us. Weak and less powerful than I think we really are as a sort of movement of movements or a, network of networks or whatever you want to call it. I think there are tons of values aligned people out there.

    So how do we connect them all together is the piece that I would love us to be able to solve and I don’t need that to make our organization bigger. I need it to make those organizations bigger and those enterprises bigger. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah, I love that. I also love that people in Planet First is a verification.

    It is third party because there’s something really good about verifying what someone says and as a company owner. Yeah. And my company has verifications. It’s that proof point that I am doing what I say I’m doing and somebody else verified it and said yes. And it also gives us a chance to really think about how to improve.

    Yes. 

    Rebecca Dray: And 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: how to demonstrate, because the last thing we want do really 

    Rebecca Dray: important. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. Yeah. The thing, the last thing we want in these networks of networks is a lot of greenwashing is things Yeah. And whitewashing. 

    Rebecca Dray: Absolutely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Whatever, washing, because there’s been so much of that in the past. So I look at it as a good gateway, not a negative.

    To think about having a verification really does help us get past any thought barriers to a point where everyone in these organ, in these networks of networks together understands that they’ve all crossed the same bridge. And that is that somebody says, yes, you are doing what you said you were doing.

    You are making a case. You are making a claim. Yes, you are doing what you said and you’re proving it. I personally, I think that’s great. 

    Rebecca Dray: Yeah. No I agree with you. And I think that not only is it a way of. Proving something and showing something and being validated. I think it also calls people in on the journey and it shows them what good looks like.

    And so for me, we talk about this a lot in terms of the verification. We never say to somebody, you don’t qualify. You are not verified right in that way. What we say is, at this time, you don’t meet all five of the standards, but we encourage you to read the review guide, to read the documentation, to read what the standards say, and we are more than happy to help signpost you to how to improve.

    People ask us for improvement points all the time, and I think that’s fantastic. We should be calling people in, not calling them out for what they haven’t done yet. And I think we need more of that in society. To me, this is a journey, right? It’s like when you were talking earlier about buy local is great, but what about, and I remember hearing somebody once talk about this as concentric circles.

    So yes, if the gold standard is right in the center, there are all of these ripples and concentric circles coming out from that of good, right? And so how do we pull people towards the middle rather than pushing them outta the circle? I think that’s really, really important and part of the mission of what we’re trying to do is educate, bring people along, call ’em in, show them what’s possible.

    So the verification really does that, and it’s being used more and more now by networks globally who want to educate others and say this is what good looks like for your business. Which is fantastic. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. And how can people find you and join. 

    Rebecca Dray: Purchasing with purpose.org people and planet first.org.

    So very simple. Both of those if they want to email me personally, Rebecca, at one of those two it’s very simple. As I say, with a really small team, we can have a very simple email address, which is our first name, and then the name of the organization. But yeah, there’s, there’s directories and things on our website.

    There’s, we haven’t even touched on all the other things that we do around local place-based buying initiatives and things like that. Some of the things that we’re building out this year, which are gonna be really exciting around shifting spend, but I think a lot of it’s on our website, the same with people on Planet First.

    It’s got a quick links page that has the answer to just about any question anybody might ever ask you about the verification. And we add to it and improve it all the time. So if people want to know more. It’s easy to find a lot of information on the people on Planet First website. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And I second that because I do support other companies that are seeking to do it and 

    Rebecca Dray: yeah, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: and help them along with that.

    And everything is in the show notes. So if you’re ready. The final question is the one that has nothing to do with what we just talked about, but that is if you could have dinner with up to three more people, so a table of four living or deceased, who would they be and why? 

    Rebecca Dray: So my answer’s probably going to be a little bit pedestrian and sentimental, but actually it would be three people who have passed who I really care about and and all of them died quite suddenly.

    And I think, so one of the things I try to do now in life is. Tell people that I love them. Tell them that I care about them. Explain how I feel. Give somebody a hug. Things like that. I think we need more of that in our daily lives. And there are three people in my life who passed very suddenly.

    And one of them was my father-in-law and we were politically about as opposite as you could get, but we cared about each other really deeply. And he was a very caring, loving person who I would have amazing debate with about the state of the world and so on. But he really, really paired and he had this sort of graph exterior, but he was a teddy bear really on the inside.

    And I miss him greatly. And he died very suddenly. And the same with. One of my really, really close friends. It was actually his birthday yesterday. And it’s not quite a year since he passed, but I didn’t get to say goodbye to him. And I have another friend as well that that happened to. And I think when somebody, I can think from a sort of nice, cuddly perspective, either these authors or famous people or, whatever that I might want to talk to and Sure.

    I love talking to people. I love the sociology and the psychology of people and learning how they got into things and why they do them and so on. But there’s something to be said about having that last bit of time back with somebody that was taken from you really quickly and that you didn’t get to say goodbye to.

    That I think is very important. And, whenever I am away from my son or my partner or people I love, I always say, I love you as the last thing. I was telling somebody the other day, an unsolicited I love you from my child is probably the most amazing thing in the world. You can’t explain that, explain unless you’ve felt it.

    But when your kids go through like teenage years, and they don’t really need you as much and stuff, but then just outta the blue you get, and I love you mom. Oh, I, it’s just so special. I really, really value those moments. So yeah, that’s who I would sit down with. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, that’s so beautiful.

    I thank you. I can’t wait to see you in person and give you a hug. I love you. I love what you’re doing and I think you’re a blessing in the world. So thank you very much. Thank 

    Rebecca Dray: you. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And everyone says, oh, I really 

    Rebecca Dray: enjoyed chatting to you. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, you’re so full of amazing ideas and making the world a better place.

    Thank you so much everyone. This is Kim Allchurch Flick with Mighty Measure. Signing off. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Rebecca Dray

    Dedicated to creating visibility, opportunities and awareness for enterprises that put people and planet first. Proving that impact procurement improves society alongside corporate sustainability, shareholder and customer satisfaction & employee retention. Rebecca Dray is creator of the Purchasing with Purpose movement, and engaged with the People + Planet First verification.

  • Embodying B Corp Certification: The Next Economy, Financial Gravity, and Mission-Locked Business with Ryan Honeyman of Lift Economy

    Embodying B Corp Certification: The Next Economy, Financial Gravity, and Mission-Locked Business with Ryan Honeyman of Lift Economy

    Ryan Honeyman of Lift Economy, co-author of the B Corp Handbook, about “embodying” B Corp certification and aligning stated values with lived leadership and culture – joins Kim Allchurch Flick. 

    Ryan shares his path from criminal-justice-focused psychology work to sustainability consulting and early B Corp advising beginning around 2010, helping over 100 companies certify and recertify. 

    They discuss takeaways from the B Corp Champions Retreat, including shifting from anxiety about new standards to implementation and the value of in-person community. 

    Ryan explains Lift Economy’s broader “next economy” work (worker ownership, racial equity, regenerative agriculture) and the Next Economy MBA, which has reached 800 participants across 16 cohorts. He identifies “financial gravity” as a key barrier and references Eric Ries’ forthcoming book Incorruptible on mission-locking structures. 

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro

    01:13 Champions Retreat Takeaways

    02:38 Ryan’s Origin Story

    04:43 Discovering B Corp Early

    07:36 Why Lift Economy

    09:34 Next Economy MBA Explained

    10:53 Community Shifts and Principles

    13:37 Barriers and Financial Gravity

    17:32 Optimism and AI Ownership

    21:56 Equity Focus and New Standards

    24:16 Meeting Companies Where They Are

    25:10 Consumer Demand for Values

    26:17 Real World Barriers and Hope

    27:28 Champions Retreat Strategy

    30:17 Where to Find the Work

    31:32 B Corp Paradox and Standards

    34:54 Defining Social Enterprise

    38:17 Marketing Claims and Verification

    39:29 Future of the Movement

    42:24 Dinner Table Dream Guests

    44:41 Closing Thanks and Sign Off

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. Welcome to the Mighty Measure Podcast. This is Kim Allchurch Flick and I am so excited today to be with Ryan Honeyman. Ryan Honeyman is a partner and worker owner at Lift Economy and co-author of the B Corp Handbook. The next economy, MBA, both published by Barra Kohler. For more than 15 years, Ryan has helped over a hundred companies, including Patagonia, Allbirds, Ben and Jerry’s, and Thrive Market become B, certified B Corporations, and Recertify under evolving standards and use certification as a catalyst for deeper organizational change.

    In recent years, his work has expanded beyond standards and strategy into leadership, embodiment, and culture. Ryan works in long-term advisory and coaching relationships with founders, CEOs and leadership teams to address the gap between stated values and lived behavior, helping leaders build organizations where governance, decision making and culture actually reflect their social and environmental commitments.

    Today we’re gonna talk about embodying B Corps certification. Rain. Welcome. It is a joy to have you here in the room. 

    Ryan Honeyman: Thanks so much for having me. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. So we’ve known each other through B Corp for a few years, but never met until last week at the Champions Retreat in Wisconsin. That was a delight. It was amazing.

    And I learned more than I’ve ever known before, and I feel like I’m pretty up to date with some things. But what did you feel about that event? 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah and thanks, thanks for having me on. I think the. The things that stood out about the Champions Retreat were, a lot of the B Court movement.

    I think in the, over the past few years we’ve been feeling a little bit stressed or anxious about the new standards and this, the content of this, champions Retreat was a lot on the new standards and luckily I do feel like people are moving from fear and an anxiety and. Feeling stuck to, okay we’re actually doing this and now let’s move into implementation.

    So it was nice to feel a little bit more of the sort of movement towards. Getting the work done and a little less of the stalling out around the new standards, so that, that stood out to me. And similar to you your opening comments I really found a lot of value. I’m reminded of how valuable it is to be in person with folks.

    I, I often forget that that is so amazing. And so that was also replenishing for me to be around other humans.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you so much for that. What, before this, what was your life journey and inspirations to this point? 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah, so I started out wanting to reform the criminal justice system.

    So I was into psychology and the psychological effects of incarceration. My, one of the professors I had in college was leading the Stanford Prison Experiment for folks who randomly know about that. But anyways I was doing this. Sort of, reforming criminal justice approach. And one of the things I did was work at a, in San Francisco at San Francisco General Hospital, had a mental health unit for emotionally troubled kids.

    Folks who were systems impacted. And that was both very. Difficult, very fulfilling. It was like, wow, this is really in the trenches. This isn’t just writing papers, in college or academia is like what? Writing papers on things. This was like one-on-one interventions and when working with the kids, but it was also so incredibly hard that I was like, wow I’m burning out.

    This is, it had been I think two years of doing that work and it was really not, it was just so hard. And also I felt like the. Where I was intervening with, kids that were already 13 to 18 had already been through so much trauma that it was feeling like I was catching folks, later in the path.

    And so what happened is that my. Brother had studied environmental studies in college and he had some of these early sustainability books. I think things like natural Capitalism, I dunno if you know, readers May, listeners may have heard some of these. Cradle to Cradle, which was a funny book, but it was like made outta plastic and it was all about remaking things and and then, some other books around about Paul Hawkin and I read these books. This is around 2010, and I said, wow, this is pretty cool. I could be, I would much rather do this green thing than what I was doing, before. And so I convinced the. The executive director of this nonprofit I was working at to allow me to be a sustainability person, sustainability manager for a year.

    So I was at the nonprofit working, but I was more looking at, lighting and, energy efficiency and water and waste and how to, make sure the kids were getting healthy food, et cetera. And then at the end of that, he the executive director was like, we can’t really keep you as a sustainability person, so what do you wanna do?

    And I was like I think I’m gonna just start a solo consulting business to work, with a number of companies around sustainability. And this is pretty early in the B Corp movement. And so as I was starting this solo consulting business by fall of 2010, I had found out about B Corps and was like, oh, this is cool because this is, all this social and environmental things.

    In one wrapped up in one thing, was the legal structure, but also the certification. And so I said, instead of sustainability more broadly, what if I just talk to companies about B Corp as a way to, to become more, socially and environmentally conscious and, so I started doing that.

    IB lab had just opened an office in San Francisco around I think 2010 or 2011. And I met folks know Andy Fife from B Lab. He’s one of the. He’s back and he was an intern. It was funny we met pretty early and yeah, I started helping companies with B Corp certification and that was the good old days when the Bay Area, we had I think there was 200 B Corp and it was like 20%, I think there was a thousand in the world and there was 20% of all the B Corps were in the Bay Area.

    But now that’s those are, those days are over. The other, I think Portland’s probably ahead of us and, and definitely places like the UK are head of the United States now. So yeah, that was the history and how I got into B Corp work. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s fabulous. And I was listening to the dates ’cause B Corp, as we know, Dar B Lab just turned 20 years old.

    So you’ve been doing this for 16 years, so you were really on the cutting edge. And I got into it through Portland State University kind of sideways because I’d been laid off and had to find something to do. But my values came with me and that was around 2013 and it felt like there weren’t that many people out there doing what we do.

    And now there’s a lot. Yeah. But progress is really amazing. But you’re definitely one of the headliners for the B Corps movement and have always been there. I think to your question, Portland is above a hundred B cores, the state of Oregon. Just slightly above. We’re like getting toward 1 30, 1 40.

    I don’t know the exact number, but it is growing and it’s so fun to, to watch and be a sideliner of, as well as doing the work with, so how has the lift economy created and what are the solutions that you’ve been bringing about? 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah, so you know, one of the things that led me to lift economy, so I was a solo practitioner.

    From 2010 to 2014 actually till 2016 technically, but I met Kevin Bayou and Sean Berry, my current business partners in 2014 or so. And what I was intrigued by, so they had started Lyft. As a company to redefine success, basically to create an economy that works for the benefit of all life.

    And it felt like they were talking about things that the B Court movement wasn’t quite talking about yet. Things like, worker ownership or. Racial equity and, also regenerative agriculture, really getting into like carbon sequestering and how do you manage land in ways that yeah.

    Is beneficial for the climate. And so I was like, wow, this is what they’re talking about is are some things that. Pretty far past what my, at the time in 2014, I was, I thought B Corps were like the highest you could go. I was like, wow, this is the top of impact. And there are some B Corps that really live into that.

    But also, there’s, the movement has some large, larger companies and large businesses that are not necessarily looking at, permaculture and regenerative ag and worker ownership. And so I was intrigued and I started to work with Kevin. On a few projects where I would do the B Corp side, and then he would help with the vision and culture and strategy around like, how do you change your business to actually be more regenerative or more aligned with all life.

    And I said maybe I should just stop being a solo consultant and work with Lyft Economy to be, a team member there so that I can handle the B Corp component of the business and still participate in some of the other pieces. And so one of the things that. Yeah, so Lyft economy more broadly so we do B Corp certification.

    We do some of the nuts and bolts consulting for vision, culture, strategy, operations, but we also have some other things that are pretty cool, like the next economy MBA, which is a, an online MBA course that we started in 2018. And we just put it out there as this. Idea of what if people wanna learn business, but they don’t wanna do a traditional MBA and they wanna learn business a different way.

    And so we had worked with 300 social enterprises more customized to help them with their business. And so we took some of the learnings from that and some of those permaculture principles and other ideas and put it into this curriculum. And we had 50 people sign up in the first year.

    Of this online course, and that was the first cohort. And now we’re actually, we’re just launched cohort 16. And so we’ve had 800 people take the next economy MBA over the last, eight or nine years. And the. Cohort 17 is gonna be launching in the fall. I think that’s September. And yeah, those are some of the different things we do as well as our other podcast, next Economy Now and The Beyond The Be Podcast.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: So I’m going to switch my question in order a little bit because it leads me to, you’re getting to know so many people who are going through this program and also working with companies. What are the communities doing in response and what is, what do you see in your community as a growing worldview about these topics that you’re teaching?

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah. I think the cool thing about the MBA is we go into some of the first six sessions are really like, let. Define the problem set and some of the, and some of the solutions. So it’s like really getting clear with folks about why we’re in the situation. We are, like, one of the things we talk about is just we call it the business as usual economy versus the next economy.

    So business as usual, we don’t really use capitalism or those things. ’cause there’s, people often have strong views like capitalism is this, or socialism is that. So we just say business as usual versus the next economy. And the business as usual is constant pressure to grow, constant, make money extraction at all costs.

    It’s the sort of standard operating model for business that we all know about in the B Corp world, in this impact world. And what we do is take folks through, like here’s some of the basic principles of what’s happening and then what are some next economy principles that could help you change your company.

    So things like defaulting to open source, something that we don’t really do in the B Corp world, which is kind of cool. Like I feel like it could be more open source. Components of things we do. Definitely shared ownership democratizing governance not just ownership, but also how do you run the company and how do you create organizations that are, vibrant and can operate more on a flat model.

    And, talk about regenerative operations. Talk about deliberately developmental. So it’s like how are you developing people? And we go through all these components and then set people up for then. Okay, let’s now go through specifically how do you do marketing from a next economy lens?

    How do you do sales? How do you do culture? How do you do, all of these things? And it’s been great ’cause there’s been a lot of B Corps who’ve come through. A lot of B Lab staff actually have taken the course and I think the way that people are responding in their communities is to say.

    Hey I’m either starting a new business and I want to integrate some of these principles or ideas from the start, or I’m within an existing company. There’s also folks who work at B Corps, maybe even large B Corps, who are like, I’m not gonna start something, but how do I bring some of these principles within my organization?

    And, yeah, people are doing different things. It’s just depends on what their role is, but it’s it’s been a vibrant community and people are building towards something that goes beyond even what B Corp can offer. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. Thank you. This is so inspiring. And what, along the way and currently are some obstacles and challenges?

    Ryan Honeyman: Yes. Some of the obstacles and challenges and know I can go in a little bit too. One of the things that I have learned recently is there’s a author named Eric Rees who wrote the book, the Lean Startup many years ago in 2011, and he became very famous for that because he was all, the basic theory was like, how do you create the minimum at MVP, which is a minimum viable product, which is basically tried something, test it, and then iterate instead of doing a lot of work to create these fully fleshed out things.

    He’s been. He started something called the Long-Term Stock Exchange, which is also a, for publicly traded companies who want to go public but associate their their going public with long-term investors. And so they’ve got a couple companies, I think thread up is one and Asana, and there’s another one.

    So it’s in the earlier stages. But the reason I mention Eric is one of the main barriers. For a lot of us in the mission-driven world is what he calls Financial Gravity, which is like the business as usual idea that we talk about, but financial Gravity is just that. Ultimately everything comes down to how are you going to, how.

    Make money and protect against the pressures of, what it means to run a business which is usually to maximize shareholder value. And so he talks about benefit corporations in there, but he also talks about some of the things that benefit corporations are one aspect of this.

    Sort of, he calls it like creating armor for your company. Like benefit corporations are one thing, but you can also do things with the board of directors where you have your board take an oath to like always uphold the mission, which is pretty important. You can also create. He calls it spiritual holding companies, which is like a nonprofit, which owns a a for-profit entity.

    There’s also purpose trust, like Patagonia with their purpose trust. I think Tony Choon also has a trust ownership structure. So the, I think some of the barriers to this expansion of the B Court movement or the next economy has been just, the financial gravity of always feeling pressure to do more with money.

    And so what he’s been able to do is to create this, his book is called Incorruptible that’s coming out and it’s basically how do you structure your company not just as a benefit corporation, but other unique models that will really mission lock your company for the long time and help us better prevent.

    Things like what happened to, to Allbirds or others who were, Allbirds was a benefit corporation and a certified B Corp, but they still felt that pressure to expand and grow and they weren’t even, they were never actually profitable and it led partially to their unraveling of their company and like an AI company now, which is crazy.

    Yeah, there’s a lot of, there’s a lot of barriers and I think the Eric’s book, incorruptible is a great resource for folks 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: and in a timely fashion. As we’re recording this in spring of 2026, I just saw your newsletter come out this morning with that book mentioned, so we’ll put that in the show notes too.

    It’s great that people are thinking along those lines in a pragmatic fashion. The what? Businesses, but not the old ways where it used to be the corporate world that I came from, where you live and die by your quarterly numbers and. The stress level is just beyond, but it’s all for the stakeholders and it’s like, what have you done for me lately?

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And so I’d love the way you’re talking about that. I’m gonna get the book Incorruptible and I’ve read your books as well. Also wanna mention to the audience that the B Corps handbook is going into version three, so keep our eyes out for that. Really, really interesting topics. All of this what makes you optimistic?

    Ryan Honeyman: I think going to something like the Champions Retreat and just. Getting that sort of feel like the live contact with other people and the sort of inspiration from being around other B Corps. That’s, that makes me optimistic. I’ve got a, an 11-year-old and an eight 11-year-old daughter and an 8-year-old son who are like very cute and.

    Joyful, but also pushing my daughter’s pushing into tween zone, she’s still, she’s very sweet and so I just, I’m optimistic because I see it’s just so fun to be with them and to parent them and things like that. And this is kind of a weird way to go, but I will say that maybe 12 to 24 months ago I was.

    Much more pessimistic about all the AI stuff. With I, I still know that it’s like using a ton of energy and it’s, potentially changing a lot of things for the worse. And at the same time, like I just am. I feel like I’m more, it’s more like it’s here. And I think maybe a year or two ago it was like, wait, we should stop it.

    And slow down and things like that. But now it’s just it’s here. And then, so how are we working with it and using it in ways that are actually beneficial to folks? And creating, creating an economy that works for all. My, my business owner, my business partner Kevin, talks about, with ai you need to pair it with inclusive ownership. The example he uses was in the seventies when, Ford Motor Company would come in with robots and say, we’re gonna lay off, 5,000 employees because we’re gonna have robots build the cars.

    If you are just an employee of Ford Motor Company, you’re like, this is terrible. You’re gonna fight it as hard as you can. You’re gonna push back. If you’re a co-owner of Ford Motor Company, like if there was broad based ownership of Ford or something and you’re, the robots came in, you’re like. I’m an owner of Ford, and so the profits and benefits of these robots coming in is actually gonna make my work easier.

    Like I don’t have to, it’s not as unsafe as maybe it was and blah, blah, blah. And so that changes the dynamic of technology advancing because you’re participating in the upside. And so Kevin’s thing with AI is like, how do we make sure that the. The, there’s more broad based ownership of AI models and the sort of profits that come because then the sort of wealth creation and benefits go to the people.

    All people as opposed to it being a, just more financial gravity and shareholder primacy and going to these super rich billionaires. So that, that makes me optimistic too, about that possibility. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: It’s interesting you brought that up because a AI is still something I find hard to define.

    Because of so many things. I use it a little bit to help correct my grammar. That’s way different than flying airplanes and a lot of other things that it does. But I love how you phrased that. And also anytime there’s change and people worry about losing jobs, you mentioned the robots. I said, yeah, but somebody’s gotta build the robots.

    So that’s creating jobs. So there, there also seems to be that along the way and we. Now we have more and more B Corps. So also looking for who are those innovators that are doing some really amazing things with good values. And I think that’s why I find optimism is in the innovators. And there’s one I’d love to support.

    It’s called Virtue Lab. That’s mostly Cleantech. Not every company’s gonna make it from the get go, particularly when they’re. Inventing something that has to have prototypes. It takes a lot of money and research. Often it cannot prove out, so some companies never get off the ground. But the ones that do can do some amazing things, and maybe AI is helping them go faster.

    I think AI can help medical research be clearer and go faster. So there’s so many possibilities, but I’ve gotta admit, I can’t understand. That the two little letters that are bigger than me. Yeah. And then there’s the energy concerns as well that come up with that. But I’m glad you brought it up because this is real conversation in real time.

    It’s talking with you is the other thing that comes to mind is we work in a world where we’re working with businesses and each one of those businesses has a silo or a niche. Or something that they’re very, very focused on. And we get to see a global view of all that. But I love that you brought up really specifics that people are focusing on, like permaculture, regenerative, ag regenerative business, how to do things better for people, employees doing it with equity and not backing away from that.

    And I think one of the things I really appreciated right from the get go at Champions retreat was they put equity and current affairs on the table and said, we are here. To talk about it, to do the right things, not shy away from it and stand for our values. And that made me feel really optimistic because it’s the not shying away from it part, nobody tread lightly.

    But it wasn’t combative. It wasn’t anything that was anything. But like Michael said, this is about all people. What else would you like to share? What else is on your mind about the world you work in and what you’d like to do?

    Ryan Honeyman: I would be curious, maybe we could talk a little more about. What you’re sensing from your, we could talk about the conversations around B Corp, did you find folks, in your conversations, did you find people still feeling overwhelmed by the new standards or were you finding people get grasping it a little more?

    What? What did you see from your conversations at the Champion retreat? 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I think it’s twofold. One is people who haven’t looked at them yet still have trepidation. And the other discussions I’ve had with the organization that I’m in, in Oregon, the on purpose Oregon, which used to be local PDX.

    Also talking about how it almost seems like the companies that have recently recertified or certified and still have some time are postponing. So there’s that gap too. I, what I did is, as you did, worked with B Lab along the way. So the last two years have been aware enough. My company just recertified in November and I just jumped right into the new standards.

    But I’m plotting along and taking a bit at a time as I do other things in life as well. I’m a visual learner. I really, really like it. I think another thing that I’m seeing that. For me, and this is my world of view about it, is I wanna meet people where they are. And I love B Corps. I’ll always say that.

    Not every company wants to become a B Corps, so how can I help other innovations have come along? B Corps is definitely the, the stake in the ground 20 years plus. And yet there’s benefit Corporations for Good, which was created seven years ago, almost eight now, and it’s a lighter version. It’s also more accessible to companies at a lower price point.

    And then there’s the purchasing with purpose movement and people in planet first, and somewhere in there there’s something for almost everybody who’s mission driven. The other thing I never forget is Nielsen’s data from, one is from 2014. One’s from 2017, I think, and I’m always paraphrasing, but it’s that globally, 66%.

    Of consumers are willing to pay more for products and services when they know a company is sustainable and has good values. So there’s a lot of interpretation in there. The world sustainability can mean a hundred different things to a hundred different people. It’s kind of overused term, but knowing that people are looking.

    That gives me optimism. So how can they find us? And all these B cores, that’s to me is the missing link. And it comes with the marketing, the expression, all of that. And then the other study was about millennials. Same kind of questions, but they were in the 73%. And I also believe that as we’re growing and innovating and becoming more prolific as B Corps and mission driven companies, that the price point doesn’t always have to be higher.

    That maybe even if they’re willing to pay more. They can also know that they’re gonna pay the same to transition and find a company that has good values. So that’s what I’ve been operating with. And, but also being really realistic. For instance, there’s a couple of companies that really wanted to strive for B Corps.

    They’re also consumer products. They also import, and guess what happened? The tariffs went from 15% to 50, and the last thing this business owner can do is become a B Corps. And she’s just struggling to survive right now. So that’s the worldview. I really hope that through this year that more opportunities arise for people instead of fewer and that they find their way.

    But I do think the possibilities are endless, and I love seeing that there are people in agriculture. That are getting certifications, like regenerate certifications, and they really know what they’re doing in that realm. And that really gives me optimism too. And there’s people in different sectors who really know what they’re doing in these realms, whether it’s energy environment, but also with equity, with hiring, with treating people well things that they’re doing in community.

    So it’s out there. 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. But how do you see it? 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah. Yeah. I think other takeaways for me from the retreat were, it’s funny, one of my strategies. For B Corps retreats is I actually don’t go to that many formal sessions. I just more hang out in the hallways because I I tend to see a lot of people that I wanna talk to.

    And, usually at retreats it’s they’re quite heavily scheduled of you have 10 minute break and then you go into this 90 minute session, then there’s an eight minute break, and then you’re, but most of the. People, there are the people I wanna see. And yeah, I just tend to go to the hallways and also pace myself ’cause, it’s also hard to, and I’ll mention it to Karen for the feedback on the retreat, but a lot of the events also had really loud music. They’re like, and it was like hard to have communic to like communicate with folks. But yeah I think that that was a piece that, that stood out was just the sort of, the whole retreat strategy and like how do you get, go and meet the right folks and get the most out of it? For me, my retreat strategy is mostly to go to a couple sessions, but mostly hang out in the hallways just to communicate with folks.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s so smart. This is my first Champions retreat and I was all in, and I did find it exhausting at the end. I also noticed the noise level like you did. I met so many new people, but it was also great to see people that I’d been on Zoom with for years and never met in person. So things of that nature I thought were, it was so interesting.

    I also made an error. I, because I needed to come home, so I had to leave before the end sessions. I also missed all the. Banter and everything at the end that was coming up in LinkedIn. I’ve seen photos of, and I said, oh, I should have not done that. So lesson learned, but I also go to really specific conferences sometimes, like one was Go Green that I haven’t heard of anymore, but Clean Tech ones that are more focused on a specific type of industry, but still doing it with values and optimism and what I see as the.

    Connectivity and how much of that champions retreat like touched on, things like that they touched on. I went to one about water. It was really interesting. Even though it may not affect me directly, the indirect knowledge is still important. So it’s, the thing about general business is we can’t always be too general.

    It’s nice to know some really deep specifics and I think Champions Retreat did touch on that as well. Yeah, absolutely. The vendor marketplace was great. It was fun. Yeah, I came home with stuff. Yeah. 

    Ryan Honeyman: Awesome. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Is there anything else that you’d like to add? 

    Ryan Honeyman: I. Maybe we could I’m happy to jump on the, like the dinner with the three people or like the dinner one question or something.

    Or I dunno if you had other questions as well. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: One is, how can people reach you? And I do wanna make sure that people know that in the show notes is your books, that newsletter. Everything. So how would you refer people to reach you? Yeah, 

    Ryan Honeyman: yeah. Folks wanna reach out? I definitely would suggest folks check out the Next Economy mba.

    That’s at lyft economy.com/mba. The Lyft economy.com site has all of our. Sort of content. I’m probably, I’m most active if folks are on social, on LinkedIn. I’ve removed myself from Twitter whatever the platform is now. And I never made it to the other transition platforms like Mastodon or anything.

    And I also never really signed up for Instagram. So LinkedIn is is where folks can go if they want to connect. And. Yeah the other podcasts I mentioned, so Next Economy Now is it’s more of a broad podcast that we’ve been doing now for 10 years at Lyft. And we’ve had. I think 300 people on now.

    But it’s things like, climate activists racial and racial justice activists. Also like business leaders. Like we had the, a number of people from Patagonia on there’s one gonna be coming out. With Eric Rees on the, his new book that’s coming out soon. And so it, it ranges the gamut.

    And then our Beyond the Be podcast is more B Corp specific. We also like to get into the, so we talk about the new standards and things and developments, but there’s also the bigger juicy questions of one of the recent episodes we did was on the paradox at the heart of the B Court movement with todd Ling and Ante Kim, and if, have you heard of that? The h the Harvard Business Review article that they did? 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: No, I haven’t. I’d love to. 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah, so they did a an article called The Paradox of Growing as a Values LED Company and it was a Harvard Business Review article from 2024, and it was about the B Court movement and how the B Court movement has.

    Grown but not collapsed like a lot of other social movements. Famously, like there’s been a lot like Social Venture Network, which started and then is like not really as, as strong anymore. I think it’s trying to be revived, it’s a little unclear. There’s like the American Sustainable Business Network, which I think is still going, but also had merge with Social Venture Circle and the Investors Circle and so there’s been a lot of.

    Communities that have been shifting. And so their research was on B Corp and they’re trying to say, why has it lasted? And so their paradox was that B Lab has both relaxed the standards or relaxed the sort of. The requirements at times, like for example, to allow in Ben and Jerry’s in 2012, but at the same time it’s tightened the standards.

    So for example, if Ben and Jerry’s could get in 2012, but then they also required Ben and Jerry’s and other companies to have, fully transparent, like a hundred percent of their. Their B impact assessment answers are transparent and it, and you have to have a full audit of all of your answers on a much more strict frequency as opposed to the frequency for other B Corps.

    You have to have the governance, they have to examine the governance of the sort of subsidiary to make sure it’s truly independent and has their own sustainability management system, et cetera. And so there’s they’ve both relaxed and strengthened, and they called it the paradox.

    Another word they use is consistently inconsistent about some of the changes. But it I think it’s a really helpful article and like framework to think about why B Corps have grown and been successful, and at the same time why there’s. Tensions in the movements because, like they, they list organic as something that had a lot of early momentum and then they had a lot of, or some of the fair trade controversy, but then a lot of multinationals came in and took over and it felt like that got co some of those things got co-opted, whereas opposed to the.

    The true purity side. They mentioned like the craft beer movement where it’s like you literally cannot be a large brewery in it. So it’s, it only stays small. And they would, were saying that maybe limits the effectiveness of the B Corp movement, if it was like never allow any multinational, like we would probably never.

    Reach effectiveness threshold or like a public awareness of how we are. So it’s a really fascinating article and it’s we did an interview that’s coming out on that just came out on beyond the b but I also recommend folks check out the Harvard Business Review article as well.

    ’cause it. Nerds out on B Corp stuff. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I’ll do that. And it also makes me think about some of the large B Corps that have chosen not to recertify and what is the definition of social enterprise. Can a B Corp be a P corp and not a social enterprise? And there’s another podcast out there and I was listening to one about an alcohol company.

    Tequila is tequila social enterprise. Probably not. Is alcohol’s been around since the dawn of humans almost. And yet how they run the company is another example is a company that I love locally. That is, they do oil changes in auto mechanics. They don’t sell fossil fuel, but they work with cars that use fossil fuel.

    Oil is a fossil fuel, and yet they’re a B Corps. And. And he says I can’t stop people from driving, so I might as well help people take care of their car and do it in a way that the other oil change companies don’t. So what are you seeing in as far as that goes? What is a social enterprise?

    Can you be a B Corps and not be a social enterprise? And what about these ones that have been B Corp for a while and are choosing not to? Yeah. 

    Ryan Honeyman: It’s funny, I. That oil, that car mechanics company, do you know if it’s run by someone named Farhad? Farhad 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Kadi, yes. 

    Ryan Honeyman: Okay. So I went to college with him.

    Oh, at uc, Santa Cruz. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. That’s 

    Portland. 

    Ryan Honeyman: Yeah. Yeah. And now I know, I knew that he had opened up at B Corp auto mechanic. It’s so That’s great. Yeah, tell him hi, if you say, if you talk to him. But yeah I actually, the whole social enterprise thing is interesting to me because. It wasn’t until Aaron Sahan from Donate Economic, formerly of Donate Economics had made some, critical statements of B Corps allowing espresso in that I ever thought that the B Corp movement were not comprised of or composed of social enterprises. Like I thought everyone was just a social enterprise and I, and it was helpful to have some conversations on beyond the b and otherwise with a, to, to have him clarify well look, social enterprise is you’re doing this for the benefit.

    Of society and your, probably donating or you’re probably putting a majority of profits back to the mission as opposed to taking them out for shareholders. And so he is like not, not every B Corp you could say is doing it. For the for the benefit of society and the environment, you could argue that something like, I don’t know, maybe Allbirds or others was like more of a profit driven company that had some sustainability components.

    But is it a social enterprise? I think they would, Erin would’ve quibbled with it. So it was interesting conversation and I do, that’s one reason I like the people in Planet Firth first certification and Rebecca Dray’s work and Erin’s work as well because as but just for listeners who don’t.

    It’s only five requirements and one of them is you have to donate or you have to give a majority of profits or reinvest or give a majority of profits to your purpose. Like you can’t just say you’re a social enterprise and then take like 98% of the money out for shareholders, to enrich shareholders or something.

    And that I think is a really great, like litmus test for a lot of companies is what are they doing with the majority of profits that they make. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah, I agree with that. Thanks so much for that. I think it is important to talk about definitions and where definitions can be lacking, so they can mean different things to different people, and yet it can still all be good.

    You have words like sustainability, words like impact. They all mean different things to different people. So in conversation I think it helps to discuss it in some ways and say what does it really mean to us or to a person or to a company? And have that be defined? And for me, I find the frustration when I know a company is doing really good things.

    The frustration is the lack of expression not strong marketing, not. Making a claim and not having a way to back it up. All of these things. So that’s where I see a lot of work can be done is, and if companies aren’t, they don’t say so. That’s, I think that the verifications are really terrific for helping weed out what might be potential greenwashing and.

    Which we’ve been through before in, in recent and long histories. There’s long history of making false claims. So I do think there’s tremendous value in making claims and being able to prove it and have a third party verification. Yes, absolutely. Yeah. I’d love to talk to you about the future a little bit.

    What Sure. That comes with the optimism. And then let’s go to dinner with your four people. What is there anything in the future. That you wish for or think about might happen? 

    Ryan Honeyman: One thing that’s, that is weighing on me a little is you mentioned I’m writing the third edition of the B Corp handbook.

    And so that’s probably gonna come out in September, 2027. A little bit TBD, but I think. The, so the, you know what I’m hoping for the future is to write something that’s both, takes into account the things that have happened because I feel like in 2019 when the last edition was written, it’s like a whole new, it’s actually all the racial justice uprising, all COVID, all the anti woke.

    Everything has happened since then. So it’s actually interesting to write a new edition, but I think what I’m hopeful for is doing some writing something and. That can be a tool for expanding and growing the movement in a way that takes into account everything that’s happened, but also, helps I think, position the B Corp movement for the next 20 years.

    That like some of the founders of B Lab have said. ‘Cause I’ve spoken to a few for this book and they’re like, don’t look backwards in the last 20 years. Let’s look forwards the next, the next 20 years. And I’m like, yeah, that’s true.

    There’s a lot of exciting stuff. So I think it’s like balancing those things while staying sort of authentic. And I’m optimistic that B Corps can maybe adopt some more some of these potential like mission lock structures that Eric Rees talks about that we can create more systems change with the new the new B Corps standards being focused on systems change a little more than individual company performance and that.

    Fingers crossed, we don’t have any more big negative scandals in the B Corp community. Seems like we’ve gotten out of that pattern a little bit, but, honestly, with with 10,000 companies, Bart Houlahan at the Champions Retreat was saying this is the largest business for good movement in the world now.

    And I did ask AI to verify that it’s the UN like global compact for business is larger, but those aren’t verified third party. So I was like, okay, it’s the largest, maybe it’s the largest third party verified of business for good movement. And so yeah, I’m optimistic about what’s possible in the future.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Great. And I think the global B Corps is also growing. Yes, B Corps is around the world that’s faster than 

    Ryan Honeyman: us, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: and the purchasing with purpose movement is actually growing more quickly. The US is the slowest growth. It’s growing more quickly and in Africa, Latin America, Asia, Europe. So yes. Thank, thanks so much.

    I think we could geek out for a long time, but let’s wrap it up with the dinner question. If you could have dinner with up to three people living or deceased. For a table of four, who would they be and why? 

    Ryan Honeyman: Oh, wow. The one person that popped into my mind just, so alive is Yon Scho from Patagonia because he’s such a, he’s such a, a I would, I will say like weird or like eccentric or he’s just so out there that it’s like, who is this guy? And what, what really makes him tick? And I’ve only, I’ve seen some of his talks. I did many years ago in, I think 2014 or something, I did see him speak live and got to meet him at a 1% for the planet event.

    He’s not very, he’s not like a gregarious, he doesn’t like open up and just let loose. But I feel like in a dinner table context, he might just say more about, about himself. So that’s definitely one person that, that comes to mind immediately. Another person would probably be.

    I think Barack Obama would’ve a lot of interesting things to say about what he sees in the world and what it’s like being president and all the balances, all the things that he’s had to go through. And so that’s someone I’d probably want at the table. And then, yeah, maybe some. I think I’m like searching for more of a historical.

    Figure that’s been through some stuff that could maybe put all the, like global unrest, in context. ’cause that, someone who’d been through the civil rights movement, like the easy answer would be like Martin Luther King or something. But maybe it’s maybe or may not, it’s that, but just someone to be like, how are we doing?

    And is this, are we like way outside the norm of what we’ve been through in America or the world? Or is this like just. It’s a cycle and, these are the moves that like, keep doing this, keep pushing forward because things will change rapidly and then, suddenly what you’re doing could really break through.

    So I think I would be yearning for someone to have that like historical perspective, a little bit of like systems change. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, that’s so intriguing. Oh, I think having you at that table too would be pretty awesome because you have done a lot of systems change for a lot of people, and it’s been terrific. I really appreciate you being here.

    Ryan Honeyman: Thanks so much for having me, Kim.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you. Everyone, thank you for listening. This is Kim Allchurch Flick with the Mighty Measure Podcast. Signing off and wishing you a good day. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Ryan Honeyman

    Ryan Honeyman is smiling in an outdoor setting.

    Ryan Honeyman is a Partner and Worker-Owner at LIFT Economy and co-author of The B Corp Handbook and The Next Economy MBA, both published by Berrett-Koehler. For more than 15 years, Ryan has helped over 100 companies—including Patagonia, Allbirds, Ben & Jerry’s, and Thrive Market—become Certified B Corporations, recertify under evolving standards, and use certification as a catalyst for deeper organizational change.

    Ryan is the co-host of Beyond the B, a podcast exploring what is working and not working in the B Corp movement, and a co-host of Next Economy Now, a LIFT podcast highlighting leaders advancing regenerative and whole-systems approaches to business.

  • Tropical Salvage and Earth-Friendly Natural Burial Vessels with Tim O’Brien

    Tropical Salvage and Earth-Friendly Natural Burial Vessels with Tim O’Brien

    Tim O’Brien, Director of Operations at Tropical Salvage and founder of Natural Burial Vessels, joins Kim Allchurch Flick for conversation about his environmental values and design-driven social enterprise.

    O’Brien describes early awareness of human-caused ecological disruption, then explains how travel and work in Indonesia led him to salvage deconstructed old-growth timbers—often from centuries-old buildings—into distinctive, durable furniture, later shifting to river “sinker log” recovery as competition raised costs.

    He discusses efforts tied to Borneo’s Katingan conservation project, restoration work in Java and Mount Muria, and challenges such as local impacts from reforestation shade on rice paddies.

    O’Brien then outlines his move into fully biodegradable woven funeral products, critiques pollution from embalming and cremation, notes growing U.S. demand for green burial (from two to hundreds of sites), and shares how to find Natural Burial Vessels.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Welcome and Guest Intro

    02:04 Early Environmental Awakening

    07:07 Indonesia and Salvaged Wood

    13:11 Building Tropical Salvage

    20:14 Borneo Conservation Lessons

    26:34 Java Reforestation Efforts

    36:19 Shift to Burial Vessels

    44:45 Greener Funerals and Cremation

    49:18 Finding Natural Burial Vessels

    52:43 Dinner With Influences

    57:46 Closing Thanks and Wrap

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. This is Kim Allchurch Flick, and I am delighted to have a dear friend on this particular podcast, Tim O’Brien, who runs Natural Burial Vessels and also a company called Tropical Salvage Role as Director of Operations. Tim O’Brien is a serial entrepreneur who has worked in Indonesia for over 25 years.

    He has focused on working with artisan communities to apply natural renewable materials to craft distinctly beautiful, multifunctional and earth friendly furniture and homewares. This history of design and craft segued into his current work, designing and marketing completely earth-friendly funeral equipment, including burial vessels, carriers, shrouds and urns.

    Tim’s design instincts are influenced to some extent by George Nakashima’s work and strongly by the mesmerizing beautiful forms and textures offered by nature itself. He believes that environmentally circumspect and supportive product choices should be available in every marketplace. He also believes that people evolve to prefer natural materials in forms to characterize their living and workspaces.

    Tim leads the natural burial vessels design team, and he also offers an experienced hand in logistics and management. Today’s topic is a lasting last and lasting gesture of peace within nature. Welcome, and thank you so much for being here. 

    Tim O’Brien: Hey, Kim. Good to see you. Thank you for having me on your podcast.

    It’s flattering and I’m inspired. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I’ve been inspired for years because we met a couple of decades ago. 

    Tim O’Brien: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Because I found out about Tropical Salvage and I’d love the furniture and friendship has since blossomed and I’ve been following you into natural burial vessels. 

    Tim O’Brien: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: So I’m always inspired social enterprise at the very least, with environmental care.

    What inspired you in the beginning? What things did you see in life that helped you create tropical salvage and what are just, what are some of the values that led you along the way? 

    Tim O’Brien: I think in terms of my my determination. To work in capacities that are supportive of, environmental integrity.

    I think exposure to environmental tensions and dramas when I was a young kid that, predictably were man driven. One that I always found pretty interesting was just the I grew up along Lake Michigan in the suburbs of Chicago, the North suburbs of Chicago. And the Great Lake system has been artificially connected to the Atlantic Ocean, right through the St.

    Lawrence Seaway. And when I was a little kid, I liked to fish. And there was a period when a species called the Alewife, which is a kind of herring, that likes to. It’s sea going, and then it spawns and fresh water. It was just hordes of them were coming into Lake Michigan where they had never reached before because there was, there were too many, geographical obstacles along the way.

    There was just never there. But it was one of those things that occurred because we monkeyed with the ecosystem. And so when I was a kid, I remember these huge, really huge piles of this fish, that had died after spawning, piled on the beaches. And it was really awful. It looked very, it looked like a great disaster, which it was an ecological disaster.

    And in order to, and the reason that occurred, of course, is that. Another group of species has been, had been compromised by an also seagoing fish that had gotten into the Great Lakes because of that St. Lawrence Seaway. And that was the Lampre eel, and it was killing all of the big fish that ordinarily would eat the, but it’s a, it’s a very interesting series of ecological disasters that humans reacted to, to try to, fix.

    And so that, that was one of my early inspirations to understand how ecosystems work. Alright. And in school I’m certain I took some courses that focused on that my sort of inclination to, and readiness, to, to start tropical salvage. Was to some extent influenced by my mother, who always appreciated old wooden antiques and yeah.

    Oh yeah. She was a, wonderful sort of celebrant of old wood before it was a popular thing for, it was popularized, for example, by Martha Stewart or something like that. But in any case times were different. When we were young Kim, it was easier, this is pre-internet.

    It was easier, for example I think America had, though we have economic strength today, we had yet more strength in some of those earlier decades, late in the 20th century. My point being, I was able. As a young man who did not have debt from college to save enough money, you could afford your own apartment, you could save enough money to travel frugally in parts of the world that were extremely charismatic, not yet disturbed by the heavy hand of capitalism.

    And and I took advantage of that rather than seeking a, like a corporate job or something like that, as a lot of my friends did. And so during that time, traveling around Southeast Asia in particular, I became aware that there were all of one, you become acutely aware of biodiversity, right?

    Because it’s, especially back then, think of it. Between the time when I was about 10 years old and today the population of the world has approximately doubled, right? So there were many less, many fewer people back when I was adventuring, if you will. And you could do it so easily and affordably Back then, I many times I would stay in simple but clean, shared rooms, with several people for a buck or two a night, traveling in Laos or Thailand or Vietnam.

    But when I did finally make it to Indonesia in mid 1990s. I became aware that one, it’s one of the most biodiverse places on the planet then and continues to be today, though much has changed. And also within that scope of biodiversity, it had the most, most diverse number of tree species because of all the speciation that occurs on the world’s largest archipelago.

    It was a very foresty woody place. And yet it was, it’s wood resources were being recognized for such a narrow scope of species for the international market. And by that I mean they had vast teak plantations, they had mahogany plantations, they had rosewood plantations and then paper pulp, acacia tree plantations.

    They were not, they were creating all of these plantation scenarios for growing trees. And in order, ironically, a very common scenario in those days was they would cut down biodiverse old growth forest and then plant a plantation for the international market. And my feeling back then was, they’re wasting so much wood.

    And then at about the same time they had be, one of the expressions of modernization in Indonesia was they were deconstructing all of these old wooden structures and then replacing them with concrete and rebar. And so all of this deconstruction would be, I’d be traveling around one of the, beautiful islands there and discover that.

    Somebody had invested to expand or build new building, expand existing buildings, or build new ones. And they were deconstructing all of the old buildings, some of them three, four or 500 years old. And you just, you’d encounter these huge piles of beams and boards just sitting alongside of these dirt roads.

    And I just started asking questions because at the time I, I was thinking, I want to get into, I guess I already was doing import business. I was buying at the time silver jewelry in Thailand, in India, and then in Bali to send back to the United States. The, the profit margin was pretty good, but it’s something that didn’t really inspire me.

    It was just, I was chasing money around. It was reliable. It turns out that young people forever want to orate cement themselves with Bobs, right? So I’m selling lots of silver jewelry. But I started to see this as an opportunity that, I would encounter all of these wood opportunities, used wood, deconstructed wood.

    And there was not, the ethic of recycling had not really infected that culture yet the way it had in the United States. So I came with kind of what eyes open to a possibility like that because I mean it’s pretty, I think it’s plain why Indonesia didn’t start to practice recycling wood as quickly as the United States because there was so much wood there.

    And when people thought of. Acquiring wood for a project, they would just look at a teak plantation and gauge how many trees to cut, but in my opinion too, from my experience, my mother’s guidance of perspective when I was a kid about what is beautiful, right? I found old wood, particularly beautiful because of its history and its blemishes, its distress.

    And so a lot of these woods already had a quite distinguished history. My first project actually was salvaging I many mosques that they had deconstructed in order to build much bigger mosques. And I found that very poetically. Enchanting, the idea that this wood had been used in houses of worship for sometimes three and 400 years, absorbing all of that passion of belief, and suddenly it was just cast to the side of the road, right?

    And I just thought, wow, these beams were, they were like 15 inches square, five meters long. And they would sell ’em to me for a song. Sometimes they would be happy if I just would arrange to get them picked up. And I didn’t have any idea what I was gonna do with it, except that I knew that this wood was strikingly charismatic, strikingly unique.

    You couldn’t really see what the woods looked like. But because wood over time, it all there’s this uniform grayness that it all will acquire when it’s left in the weather. But my, the logic that occurred to me then was that, look, they’re not gonna, back in the day, 300 years ago, to build a special structure like a house of worship, they certainly would’ve chosen the best woods that were available at the time.

    And so I, not a big risk because just by lifting those beams, you knew that they were dip tarot carbs, which is a family of tree that grows in the Southeast Asian tropics. And and those are all really have always been sought after for their, integrity as wood. I just started acquiring all these piles of wood with no, of course I was already thinking we just have to make furniture out of this.

    I examined flooring as well, but. Whereas in furniture, I discovered people are much more willing to accept a variety of woods carpentered together as one form. Flooring is not the same. They want more uniformity. And so we could never really get the flooring thing going. And also because the woods were so distressed there, there were lots of blemishes that were acceptable and I would say even beautiful in a piece of furniture, but on a floor, people might see it as a flaw that, you might trip over or something, right?

    So anyway, we just started experimenting because again, it wasn’t expensive back in the day. This was pre-internet. This was, there were different sort of hierarchies of value in different parts of the world. Fine woods, which at the time were probably, fairly expensive in the United States, were regarded as just so many weeds.

    And, especially if they’re recycled or deconstructed or whatever in Indonesia. And so it was easy to, back then to experiment, to make mistakes. Mistakes were not so overwhelming, the cost of them was not so overwhelming. And so we just went about making different furniture designs making mistakes along the way.

    And eventually we started shipping containers to the United States. Of this, a hundred percent salvaged At the time it was deconstruction wood. I’ve been doing this for like 25 years. That deconstruction resource was cost-effectively available for about five years, and then many people recognized the resource.

    And so people with of greater, capacity, business capacity came in and started driving the prices up. And I realized that for what my sort of price structure was, I could no longer afford to buy that. So we alone in Indonesia, I believe, started seeking other salvage wood opportunities in, we, first thing we did was go to some of the water resources, the rivers and the lakes in the area.

    They were all full. Sinker logs absolutely full. In fact, I would say clogged in some places because nobody had ever salvage them, ever because there was no perceived need for it. But I was doing it to relieve stress, relieve impacts from existing forests, right? So I figured the more that people will buy these salvaged wood products, the less, impact there would be on forests.

    And I’m sure that that has worked its way into the, that calculus in some ways. But, I became pretty quickly aware that look, each human has just such limited capacity. And you pick your pursuits, you pick your battles. And this is something that I could do, I could turn what was just the other day perceived as garbage into value.

    Bring it to the United States, prove that value. Now, that didn’t come easy because I believe even in Portland, Oregon, which is progressive and has very woody aesthetics and everything, it was not an easy sell in the beginning to communicate to people, prospective consumers, buyers, that this is value, these, these distress, the history, the biodiversity of the wood itself, the different boards that are used, that, that has added value.

    Most people. They were used to in the marketplace encountering wood furniture with uniform grain, straight grain, uniform color. If there wasn’t the precise uniformity of color that the company, you know, that the consumer wanted, the company would just throw some artificial dye on it to darken it or lighten it or whatever.

    And my feeling was really the less we do to these beautiful representations of, these artifacts, of these ecological artifacts, these pieces of wood, the more beautiful they are. And that’s always been my perspective. It’s not shared by everybody, but I think we did turn the minds of many, many people, because tropical salvage today continues to have strong demand by a small.

    Sort of sector of the furniture buying economy.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. 

    Tim O’Brien: And I’ve noticed too many companies imitated us over the years. They, they started to bring distressed and story wood, this was from a burn barn in Iowa. This was from, and I feel like if I had some, effect on growing that perception, then that too is a positive outcome, right?

    I think we were very, certainly in the Pacific Northwest influential in, fortifying that value perspective, that these old woods are actually added value rather than, not as good as these traditional perspectives on how wood furniture should look so 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: well.

    And as a consumer, I can attest to that because I know I own some pieces that are unique, that even though the style may be the same, each one is unique. Oh. And when people see it the compliments, but also the longevity. 

    Tim O’Brien: Yes. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: These will last for years. 

    Tim O’Brien: Absolutely.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And I was wondering if you could also tell us what I’ve learned about your heart and your values over the years is also how the people who are doing the craftsmanship.

    Are treated and supported by you and also your desire to help save some of the forest in Borneo in other places. And how has that translated 

    Tim O’Brien: Java and Borneo? So we did, to clarify the, my connection to Borneo, we were part of a group that was developing one of the world’s largest forest conservation sites.

    It’s called the Katingan Project. And it’s in Borneo central Borneo, I believe. It’s an amazing thing. I know the principles in that project. I worked with them in the beginning and our contribution was I was working there before they were even, maybe they were envisioning it, but I had discovered, my group had discovered that in.

    South Central Borneo, the river salvage opportunities were like off the charts, amazing, huge sinker logs, and we did salvage many of them. And the reason they existed, of course, is because of the rapaciousness that people practiced in harvesting, the trees from those forests 40 or 50 years ago.

    Again, Southeast Asia has some of the most it, it’s densest or richest biodiversity. And then also the range of tree species that are phenomenal. Within the Dip. Tarro carp family have always been sought after. Chinese concerns have always recognized the great value in those, but.

    No one ever stopped to, these logging expeditions had occurred for throughout the 20th century, I’m sure. And nobody ever like dove into the rivers to assess what might have become cast off by those projects. I, so we started doing that discovered there again, so much wood salvage opportunity.

    We brought that to the attention of the project and the people who were envisioning the Kagan project and they, for a time included us as a a facet of the broader project. And so we were salvaging and we had, the point to a lot of this is to create jobs. That are, that are environmentally reasonable, right?

    So work on salvage wood was one of those things. What we did not anticipate was a cultural impediment. And this is, the world was so different back then, but Borneo to some extent was just in the parts where we were working. It was really only in a sleepy way beginning to participate in international capitalism, right?

    Many of the people, they lived these, they were no, they were diac people who no, no longer were nomadic obviously, but they still lived with a certain kind of. Ease and comfort in the simplicity and purity of the natural place they lived in. If they needed food, it was easy to go catch fish, or it was easy to walk into the forest and, capture a wild boar or many of the other mammals that lived there, then the weather was, is beautiful year round.

    And so you really just needed a shelter. The food, everything was there for you. And, as populations grew as business practices started to capture some of the natural resources, that ability to easily live life simply, diminished, right? So they began to participate in the the market economy.

    And we engaged crafters from in this area to, to work on making furniture parts. And then we would compile all these parts and send them to our central production in Java, and then assemble all those parts and refine them. That was the business model and it would’ve worked, except what we didn’t anticipate is the cultural tendency to, when you’re, when they’ve decided they’ve worked enough, like they’d work a week, maybe two weeks, and then decide they want to take a week off.

    And that was, that was a surprise to us. That was a cultural norm, because when you think of it of course people wanna do that, right? If you’ve never, if you’ve lived in a culture where life was, natural bounty surrounded you, what’s the point of working every day to scratch out a living, right?

    For, as they over time integrated with the global economy and global cultures, of course, they would form these ambitions and aspirations. Okay I hope X child will go to school here or whatever. But at the time it was very simple in this place and so we could not really make that work even as the Kagan project.

    Has continued to be a re like a world leader in forest conservation projects. And I think they can, they have modified the model, but I think they do have woodworkers on site now who are in a lesser, to respond to a lesser vision. I think they sell salvage wood objects at the site.

    So if there are visitors who go there, they might be able to buy something or whatever. But I saw, I envisioned something little larger at the time. So that was my involvement in Borneo. We’ve acquired most of our land in Java and that has been fascinating because again, it was inspired more by.

    Anecdotal observation over the years of working in Southeast Asia, intuition rather than deep and complex scientific calculation. So my view was, and the view of my associates was that nature is so driven to exist, to express itself in the tropics, with biodiversity and competition.

    And there’s just species, back in the day you’d go into some of these hinterlands in Indonesia where there had been few people ever and there were still, primordial forests. There were trees that were just one after another. Huge diverse. I just thought that was Indonesia, my naivete.

    I didn’t realize that this was the last gasp of this representation of nature right on the planet. Because I was visiting these places before the oil palm industry had yet really captured land. And but my experiences encountering biodiversity, in the mid nineties in the out, the far parts of Indonesia made it clear to me that if you just leave land alone, give it the time to make its, ecological decisions in a place that is.

    More suited to, to growth to life than any place on the planet really. Because in Indonesia, especially in places like Java, you have tro a tropical climate, and then you have a sort of, soil fertility aspect that’s provided by the 21 active volcanoes on the island of Java. And by that I mean they are always, one or two of them is always spewing.

    And we always, every year we read in the news here about a volcano that has erupted in Java, sometimes Sumatra, sometimes h Lui, but most of them are clustered in Java. There’s constant. Volcanic ash falling on Java. And that is some of the richest material for plant growth. So that plant growth begins and it attracts everything else, the insects, the, the birds, the reptiles, the small mammals.

    And so intuitively we understood, okay, this is the most, the richest, most dynamic growth, natural growth that occurs on the planet. And so we were like, okay, so if we set aside, our first purchase was I think two hectares. What is that? Five or six acres or something? I’m not sure.

    But a beautiful bit of land that previously had been a rice field, but had little sort of patches of forest still around it. And then there were other rice fields too, down to this beautiful and rare in Java, undisturbed small river. ’cause usually they’re, what happens to rivers in Java, which I think is the most densely populated place on the planet, is what happens to them in the United States.

    They get polluted. But so it was just an idyllic little spot. And so we purchased this land with the idea of the only work we would do on it would be to plant a set of these dip carbs and just let it grow. And occasionally, it had some fruit trees on it. So we’d go and harvest the jackfruit.

    The it had a mangus tree. It had a durian tree, but we bought it. Production was about two miles away. So we bought it in this like rural little enclave, very simple community and planted these trees. The, our local neighbors were pretty excited about an idea of somebody doing something different with the land that wasn’t agricultural, wasn’t usually growing rice, excuse me.

    And sure enough, within five years, the trees were growing incredibly quickly and sure enough, all of these species found the little spot, partly prob, I think because, the biodiversity was generated so. Rapidly there probably, because so many places were displacing species at the, just like I said, when I was a kid, the planet was, the population of humans in the world was half as much as it is today, and Java is a very densely populated place.

    But yeah, on six acres within five years, there were all these, insect species, reptiles. Within 10 years, we got C cats, we had squirrels, we had, small mammals and I believe, and within 20 years, the trees were really getting pretty big. Those that existed were huge and the local community took full advantage of the fruit that was grown on the property.

    And, we said go ahead and harvest it, but then an issue occurred. We didn’t anticipate this. So often we just don’t. People who were growing rice around our little forest restoration project said the shade that was now cast onto their patties was making them less productive.

    So the, as the trees grew bigger, the shade was making the rice patties less productive. And they had a local meeting, we weren’t violating any laws, but they basically at a local meeting and said, you have to cut down all the trees. It was really stunning and sad, but at the same time, just, this is what comes of.

    Lots of people in one place, and so we compromised with them and cut down the trees that were casting, the shade that was the most onerous to them. But, it’s the site still exist, exists today, as does another much larger site. We worked with the Indonesian government on Mount Moria to create a 60 hectare restoration product project, and those trees continue to grow today, which is, but unless really you have culture wide agreement to the importance of.

    Integrating our business pursuits with environmental rationality, right? We’re going to keep distressing the natural environment. And so what I do, what I’ve done with Tropical Salvage is just, a tiny example, a tiny demonstration of a person with an idea to do business without dis, with as few distresses, meet it out to the, natural environment as possible.

    And in many ways, benefiting the natural environment with, thoughtful restoration work like yourself, your 10 acres in battleground. That’s huge. That because you’re approaching it. Thoughtfully sensitively, you’re informed, but you have discovered what hard work is. It’s really challenging to try to do 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: it 

    Tim O’Brien: right.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And so wonderful to have help and to have the resources. And I think about your story in Indonesian, how really beautiful and wonderful it is to create a company that supports you and your family and others and gives back. And yet it’s not a complete panacea in terms of Oh, the rice and I think the other thing I’ve seen is small is mighty.

    And there are pockets of areas like Costa Rica for instance, re forested over 30 years from 25% only forest that was left to now 50. And a lot of it’s based on very small biodiverse. Farms not industrial and they’re connected together and it’s really made a difference. So like I have some hope there.

    And I al I’m also so intrigued by your story with Tropical Salvage, which still exists, is still amazing. And you’re also going into a new industry. Yeah. 

    Tim O’Brien: So this, so we have, as you mentioned, segued into weaving, using quickly renewable plant species to weave burial vessels and other funeral products.

    And I’ll tell you how we got into that. But I, it’s an exciting sort of offshoot of tropical salvage. We continue to use naturally occurring materials. So a part of Tropical Salvage has always been creating handwoven accessories for the furniture. Handwoven from natural naturally occurring species like sea, grass and water, hyacinth and pana and raton and so forth. And we’re known in our little space in Indonesia as a company who does that, as well as making the salvage, which would furniture.

    And a guy who I was acquainted with, who does his work in Europe, he asked us if this is now three or four years ago, he asked us if we could weave him. Some caskets and I was a little taken aback. I had never thought of that as a use of what we did. But after some practice we were able to do that to his satisfaction and it led me to consider something us of us who are living and life centric.

    Rarely consider what goes on in the funeral industry. We don’t really become acquainted with that until somebody close to us passes. And it is either our responsibility or partly our responsibility to answer the needs of that milestone. And, but because of business, I started thinking about, wow, he was really happy with these woven caskets, what’s going on in the United States with woven caskets. So I started to do a little research and discovered that not enough was being done in the United States with respect to earth friendly funeral practices in general, including what handwoven caskets.

    And while there was some established concerns, businesses, none of them had the craft ability or the range of material options that we were aware of and had used over many years in Indonesia and much of what was offered in the market for natural burial options or whatever. Were very simple and in my opinion, almost frumpy.

    They were entirely concerned with the earth friendliness, which is greatly admirable that that was happening. But there was not, in my opinion, enough attention paid to the aesthetics, which we had become very good at least envisioning and practicing within a range. Like I’ve told you what my aesthetics are.

    Not everybody loves ’em, but there, they’re rustic. They’re, but with an emphasis on fine craft, right? And using beautiful materials. And we envisioned those three years ago that we can. Bring our products to the United States and very, very cost competitively offer much better products. What I didn’t understand then, because in my mind it was just absolutely rational.

    If we can practice something in our culture that is much more earth friendly than how we’ve been doing it, and it’s not causing any kind of sort of market distress, of course people wanna do that, but I didn’t anticipate, as with in Borneo not anticipating some cul cultural elements of the people who we employed, I didn’t anticipate cultural elements of my own culture, which is just how.

    Committed to traditions. For example, one thing is committed to traditions. People are, even if they’re not particularly environmentally sensible and you gotta give people a lot of latitude when they’re interpreting what they want for the milestone of death, right? So whatever people want, we pretty much give them, but I figured if we get it into the, out, into the consumer awareness that, look, you can have beauty and earth friendliness if you choose to, bury your loved one, for example.

    This is something you can choose and it’s very affordable too. So I figured just offering better elements. Would appeal to people. And it definitely has caught people’s attention. I didn’t realize how few people, many progressive people I know, were not even aware that these options exist, like woven caskets that are, entirely handwoven. And I should add, this is a bit of a non-sequitur, well, not a non-sequitur, but it’s a bit of a departure from what I’m talking about right now. What really excites me about this industry as well is that the weaver weaving community we work with, I’ve watched it absolutely collapse in 25 years.

    There’s still little families who work here and there to make the furniture accessories that we produce. Storage vessels and floor mats and table settings, things like that. We still sell that stuff and they still make them, but there’s just not wide demand when you’re, when you have competition from, say China, where they have great government supported, machinery to do the weaving in any case the market.

    But with the caskets that we now weave and the carriers and other woven products there’s such a demand that occurs in the world now, and it’s just growing, just beginning to grow in the United States that I’ve watched these little groups of family, cottage industry weavers. Begin to work with bigger weaving groups and get paid more money because they really do have a very clear, a lot of them have a very clear skill that is in demand.

    Because when it comes to end of life, many people like myself, we were, and you Kim, we were raised on being, trying to be sensitive to the environment whenever possible, right? Even in a world where we’re jerked around to do many things that we know aren’t really the best thing for the forest around us or whatever.

    But we have that sensitivity. It’s ingrained, we were raised in the 1970s, the eighties, and my feeling is that a lot of people, if they’re, oh, I was talking about that. So the demand is rising because more people are buying into it. It’s that simple, right? 

    Yeah. 

    They don’t want their last gesture on earth to be contamination of the soil and water.

    And frankly, I know this is really it’s troubling to say it perhaps, but cremations are not really a great thing. Okay. The they’re 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: actually really bad. 

    Tim O’Brien: They’re really bad, right? But you don’t wanna be the one to get out. I’m not gonna get out on a street corner and start saying, cremations are bad and waving my finger because they are the most economical and maybe they’re not environmentally economical in the long term, but in, in the short term.

    With respect to people’s, financial profiles. People don’t have a lot of money to spend on a, a burial plot and what other accoutrements, right? And so I think a lot of the choice of a cremation for people often is almost purely economical. But I am here to say that many people can’t afford alternatives that aren’t so expensive, but certainly are more expensive than a cremation.

    And if they really, if the person who has passed really cared about environmental issues and the providing the kind of, ceremony that is appropriate to that person’s perspective during life is not too economically onerous for a family. They really should consider alternatives to a cremation Yes.

    And but at the same time, somebody, some people are going to have to get out there to report that the system of cremations is not really good for us. All of these, particular matter is that occurs from cremation. It goes into the atmosphere. There are not, strong filtering systems that are applied 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. To 

    Tim O’Brien: these 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: criminal and I’ll add to the show notes, a blog that I wrote when my mother passed away, because it’s often, we don’t think about burial until something happens. And I have empathy for anyone who’s surprised by a death and they have to make a decision.

    But when we know someone’s aging and there’s time to plan what my sister and I found out is that there weren’t many options until we asked and we started asking I knew that cremation is very heavy carbon load and it’s not environmentally friendly at all. So we asked for aquamation and it took I think eight different mortuaries to find one that would actually do it because the competition is so heavy to keep the old industrial.

    Burial paradigms going, there’s a lot of money there. And the other thing was, where are your green offerings as we walk past all these multi-thousand dollar caskets that, that never biodegrade and that and lots. I also researched, I’ve and found out that when people are embalmed, a lot of times that pollutes soil in the end as things over time start to leak, horrible things to think about.

    But the thing that gives me optimism as as we wrap up this story, because what you’re doing is so innovative, even though it’s ancient and the thought that. Given the knowledge, people can make decisions even in the short term. And the optimism I find is in what you’re doing completely biodegradable, yet beautiful ceremonial ways of bearing people.

    Also finding that there are cemeteries popping up that only are green. That’s all they will take. And then the other thing is the advent of many states approving and legalizing soil transformation, also known as human cremation. And that all these things are coming at the same time. And part of it is asking the questions.

    And I’m hoping that in the future it doesn’t take somebody like my sister and I going to somebody and saying, where are your green offerings? And finding out that they’re tucked in the back corner somewhere, but they’ll be more in the forefront. This is what I believe you are doing with natural burial vessels and also the other two companies that are doing the the soil transformation are gaining traction.

    Absolutely. So you’ve got a, a wave to ride. So I was wondering as we wrap up, if you can tell us what makes you optimistic and how can people find you and find out about these things? 

    Tim O’Brien: They can find us. Just, you can go, our email is info@naturalburialvessels.com. Our website is natural burial vessels.com.

    We are, so we’ve restricted our work to the Pacific Northwest thus far because there’s a lot of demand here. And as you just noted the, the numbers of dedicated natural burial cemeteries or sites have really, really grown dramatically in only like 16 or 17 years. I think 16, 17 years ago, there were two dedicated natural burial cemeteries in the United States today, I think it’s in the six hundreds and rapidly multiplying because consumers want this.

    And another thing that I encountered that I didn’t anticipate is just these sort of resistance within the established industry to yeah, to paradigms that are not in accordance with what’s been established now for about 150 years. And. They, I think many of them thought they could just ignore it, just avoid it.

    And it was a trend that would go away. But in fact, this is a deeply held feeling of many, of an increasing number of people. And I think because baby boomers are beginning to pass, right? And they really believe that we, when we can we should be an ally to the natural environment and not a, an impediment to it, smoothly occurring.

    And

    Kim Allchurch Flick: oh, what beautifully said, what a beautiful quote, be an ally to the natural envi environment, not an impediment. 

    Tim O’Brien: Yeah, an impediment is a euphemism, right? We’re we have caused such contamination. And I know it was not intentional when a lot of these practices were formed and became habituated.

    I don’t think we were even thinking about the repercussions within the natural environment. We were just thinking about ways that we wanted to celebrate these people who we love. I think many families, if they understood that these established ways of celebrating people who we love was not really in keeping with the perspective of this person who we love, who has passed, they might want to adjust some of the practices.

    And I indeed, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I’m 

    Tim O’Brien: absolutely sure that that’s true. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: What a beautiful way to, to wrap up this segment, be an ally to the natural environment, not an impediment. Then we both have optimism that people are catching on and also people don’t always live to be able to visit the loved one’s sites. So some of these other ways make memories and shrine’s different.

    Tim O’Brien: Yeah. There’s so many things. I mean, it’s exciting time.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I concur. That 

    Tim O’Brien: was at the end. Okay. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Let’s, I have a final question for you that I always find so intriguing and did I lose you? You are so amazing at doing such incredible things with two businesses to make the world better. But the last question is, if you could have dinner with anyone living in 

    Tim O’Brien: deceased, I’ve lost you.

    It happened to our.

    Of course I think many people could think of many different people. Off the top of my head, I think this is a good time for satire in order to really needle what’s going on in our culture in the United States in particular. I think I’d really like to have dinner with Jonathan Swift.

    One of the most what pointed satirists of what 18th century, I think wrote Gu Gulliver’s Travel and several other notable. I’m not sure they were books, but they were treatises on just some of the problematic ways that England was, behaving back in the day. And that I think of another English guy I’d like to meet, who his name is William Dampier, also from, I think 18th century, early 18th century.

    He’s known as a a naturalist pirate. And the reason I’d like to meet him is ’cause he was able to witness much of Southeast Asia and Australia as well, those 300 years ago or whatever. And. What a wonderland at most. It’s a wonderland today, those places. But what a wonderland it must have once been.

    And he was very, very in inspiring, because he decided to train himself, let his curiosity lead him. He was extremely resourceful and he was an, acutely interested naturalist botanist, entomologist who, who wrote some, and there’s been some great stuff written about William Dampier.

    I forget the name of one particular historical novel, but definitely check him out. William Dampier. I would love to have met him. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, wonderful. 

    Tim O’Brien: I think too I’d have to. Mentioned my grandfather on my father’s side, who I knew until I was about 13, but I just never had the wherewithal to asked, ask many of the questions I would ask him today because he was a very colorful and shrewd man.

    He, as a young man, an 18-year-old, he was flying a, one of those double winged aircraft in World War I even did some bombing runs when they were basically throwing bricks with hand grenades tied to them. He also was tasked to take aerial photos. Of the battle lands of World War I, all of the trench warfare.

    So he would be flying over it and taking these photos of the atrocities the destruction, that caused by war. Yeah. And later, oh my goodness, a story where as a tra traveling salesman for US Steel, he pulled up to a gas, gas stations were another thing back in the day. They’d always have a restaurant with them.

    There would be in the in, and this was during prohibition, and he was asked to, when he was filling or having his car filled with fuel, they asked if he wanted to have a drink. And he unfortunately was a, quite a drinker for too long. But, at the time, he was a young man, a young traveling salesman.

    His the gas station attended, asked him during prohibition if he wanted to have a drink, goes in back of the gas station where there’s a Betty, a gambling hall, and was able to meet Al Capone who was there too, having a drink. But anyway, there’s a lot of colorful stories of the life he led.

    And he was an extremely wide and deep reader. So my, that grandfather, I’d like to have a chance to talk to him again, and I, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: wow. 

    Tim O’Brien: There’s 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: a book in 

    Tim O’Brien: there somewhere. I think I’d really like to talk, I’d love to talk to John Muir. The wit the guy who witnessed California when it was still undisturbed,

    Kim Allchurch Flick: yeah, your table’s getting even bigger. I think there’s a book in there somewhere about your grandfather and Tim, I really appreciate your time here and I want everybody to know about TropicalSalvage.com because the furniture is beautiful and Natural Burial Vessels for a whole new look at how we can be kind to the planet while we loved on our deceased loved ones as well.

    Thank you. Thank you. This is Kim Allchurch Flick

    I am always so encouraged to be around people like you, Tim, who are doing great things for the world.

    This Episode’s Guest: Tim O’Brien

    Tim O'Brien is sitting with another person, outside and smiling.

    Tim O’Brien is a serial entrepreneur who has worked in Indonesia for over twenty-five years. He has focussed on working with artisan communities to apply natural, renewable materials to craft distinctly beautiful, multi-functional, and earth-friendly furniture and homewares. This history of design and craft segued into his current work designing and marketing completely earth-friendly funeral equipment – including burial vessels, carriers, shrouds and urns. Tim’s design instincts are influenced to some extent by George Nakashima’s work and strongly by the mesmerizing beautiful forms and textures offered by nature itself. He believes that environmentally circumspect and supportive product choices should be available in every marketplace. He also believes that people evolved to prefer natural materials and forms to characterize their living and work spaces. Tim leads the Natural Burial Vessels design team and he also offers an experienced hand in logistics management.

  • Building a Business for Good: Community Business Law, Benefit Corporations, and Strengthening Small Businesses and Nonprofits with Michael Jonas

    Building a Business for Good: Community Business Law, Benefit Corporations, and Strengthening Small Businesses and Nonprofits with Michael Jonas

    Michael Jonas, a JD/MBA licensed attorney and community advocate, joins Kim Allchurch Flick to discuss building values-aligned businesses for good. Michael shares his path to law, including financial hardship, losing housing twice, struggling to find employment after graduating law school in 2009, and taking nine bar exams before becoming an attorney in 2017. He explains why he created a values-based practice and the meaning behind his former firm Rational Unicorn Legal Services and his current firm Narwhal Law and Business Strategy, emphasizing accessible, practical legal help, flat-fee transparency, and business formation as economic justice and community building.

    Michael discusses challenges facing small businesses and nonprofits in Oregon, including confusion about navigating the business ecosystem, limited resource coordination, staffing issues, tariffs, low profit margins compounded by pandemic-era SBA loans and commercial lease debt, and high small business taxes. For nonprofits, he highlights risks from shrinking government funding for contracted social services, the need for hard decisions about narrowing focus, consolidating, or closing, and the lack of a nonprofit equivalent to the Small Business Administration, leaving nonprofits without sufficient technical assistance. He describes common nonprofit needs such as managing restricted vs. unrestricted funds, creating partnership agreements, scaling responsibly, clarifying board vs. staff authority, resolving governance conflict, and updating outdated, non-operational bylaws.

    They explore how Oregon’s economy depends on small businesses and a large nonprofit sector, and Michael argues for shifting emphasis from “startup and exit” toward sustainability, incubation, and helping local businesses grow into long-term anchors. He suggests encouraging shared use of commercial spaces to reduce lease burdens and address empty downtown buildings, improving triage support for organizations at immediate risk of closing, and modernizing public systems to reflect contractor, remote-work, and e-commerce realities learned during the pandemic (including unemployment coverage gaps, digital access, and childcare).

    Michael explains why he pursues Benefit Company certification, focusing on the triple bottom line of profit, people, and planet, and how Narwhal supports community through pro bono/low bono work and extensive education and presentations. He notes Narwhal operates in Oregon and Washington for business and nonprofit services, and can serve clients nationwide for federal matters like intellectual property and certain nonprofit work. They discuss how policy shifts affect clients, including DEI-related funding pressures, guidance for farmers markets on responding to ICE presence, the instability of changing or unenforced rules, and concern about Medicaid cuts affecting health organizations.

    Asked what makes him optimistic, Michael points to everyday community support and mutual aid, and he encourages people to ask “why,” check on neighbors—especially those who feel unsafe, including trans people, immigrants, and others—and lean into empathy as resistance. He shares ways to reach him via NarwhalStrategy.com, Instagram (Narwhal Law and Biz Strategy), LinkedIn, and mentions a new podcast, “All American Why,” plus an upcoming values-based directory project, Narwhal Pods (narwhalpod.com), supported by a Portland State University MBA capstone team. Kim closes by inviting listeners to explore Narwhal’s educational offerings and resources.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Welcome + Meet Community Business Lawyer Michael Jonas

    01:41 Michael’s Journey: Financial Struggles, 9 Bar Exams, and Finding His Path

    04:32 Starting a Values-Aligned Law Firm (Rational Unicorn → Narwhal Law)

    04:46 Why “Rational Unicorn”: Making Law Accessible, Human, and Creative

    08:21 Business Ecosystem Pain Points: Overwhelm, Resource Gaps, and “The Math Doesn’t Math”

    11:11 Nonprofit Reality Check: Funding Pipelines, Consolidation vs. Closure, and Missing Support

    13:22 What Nonprofits Need Most: Scalability, Restricted Funds, and Board/Staff Clarity

    17:34 Strengthening Oregon’s Small-Biz Economy: Sustainability, Shared Spaces, and Urgent Triage

    23:34 Post-COVID Business Shifts: Remote Work & New Economic Realities

    25:00 Pandemic Lessons We’re Forgetting: Unemployment, Tech Deserts & Childcare

    26:03 Values-Driven Entrepreneurship: Social Enterprise & Doing Work That Matters

    26:52 Why Become a Benefit Corporation: Triple Bottom Line in a Law Firm

    28:33 How Narwhal Puts Values Into Practice: Pro Bono, Education & Community Impact

    30:29 Where Narwhal Operates: Oregon/Washington + Federal IP & Nonprofit Work

    31:02 Policy Whiplash for Businesses: DEI Orders, ICE Guidance, Tariffs & Medicaid Cuts

    35:09 What Keeps Me Optimistic: Community Care, Protest, and Rebuilding the Social Contract

    37:29 Small Acts of Activism: Empathy, Checking on Neighbors, and Supporting Local Business

    42:51 How to Reach Narwhal + Narwhal Pods: Building a Values-Based Provider Network

    44:12 Dinner Table of Four: RBG, Harvey Milk, MLK + Closing Thoughts

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. This is Kim Allchurch Flick, and I am so excited to be here today with Michael Jonas. Michael Jonas is a JD MBA licensed attorney community advocate. Champion for equitable economic and social systems. Throughout his career, he has focused on strengthening small businesses, nonprofits, and mission-driven organizations through accessible legal services, legal education, strategic guidance and values aligned support.

    Michael continues this work by empowering community organizations through direct legal representation, consulting, training, and legal adjacent education, rooted in clarity, practicality, and community care. Today we’re gonna talk about building a business for good. So Michael, welcome. It’s so good to see you.

    Michael Jonas: Yeah, it’s always good to see you. Thank you so much for having me. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: You are so welcome. We have known each other for. Quite a while, and I believe it was through the beginnings of Benefit Corporations for good. You’re a new attorney starting in very young practice. A lot has happened since we met before COVID, which has happened through that.

    So thank you for being here and also a super good friend. So tell us about the journey. That brought you here and to this place and how your values played a role. 

    Michael Jonas: Again, thank you for having me and I have loved getting to know you and Greg and I think I’ve known you for. Nine years, 10 years, something like that.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s very close. 

    Michael Jonas: Yeah, so I do what I call community business law. I I’ll tell you a little bit about how I got here, but I know we don’t have all day. The most interesting thing was, growing up my dad and mom always said, you should own a business or you should do something where you have freedom.

    My parents had a lot of issues with jobs that either were draining, somewhat abusive, or didn’t really give ’em true ownership. We struggled really financially. And then as a child, we lost our house when I was 12. And then, I went to law school and lost my apartment and my car and had a, another cycle of that after getting educated.

    And then I had a hard time getting employed and had to take nine bar exams to become an attorney. That’s the shortened version. And I graduated law school in 2009. I didn’t become an attorney until 2017. In the interim of that, in addition to bar exams, I did all kinds of jobs. I did real estate marketing, mediation.

    I did restaurant work. And so after failing five California bars, I decided to move to Portland sight unseen, which is nuts, but I had. I decided I wanted to move to either Denver, Austin, Portland, or Seattle. And I went with Portland. And then, yeah, I moved here thinking, okay, I’m gonna take one Oregon Bar exam and pass.

    I ended up taking four here. And so passed my ninth bar exam. And when I passed my ninth bar exam, I was working at BPA Bonneville Power Administration doing. Some contract work there working in the real estate department, real estate record department. And soon after starting that, I checked and got the results.

    I thought that maybe this is a list of people who didn’t pass or there’s some sort of mistake. And I remember going outside on the patio and kind of crying hysterically and calling my husband. We weren’t married at the time or yet, but 

    He had been with me for four of my nine bar exams in Oregon and basically saying, I passed and how would that affect me and what would I be doing?

    And so the first thing I did was let it sink in. I think that because. There were so many years in between. And because I wasn’t sure if I was ever gonna be a lawyer, even though I wanted to and kept taking the bar I had to let that all sink in. A part of me wanted to say, screw you all.

    I’m done. I passed the bar. I’m a lawyer now. But I knew that in past circumstances I had to stay at that job. And yeah I thought about all my choices and I decided that the best choice for me was to create my own law firm that matched my values. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. And how did you come about the name of that law firm?

    Michael Jonas: Yeah, so currently my law firm is Narwhal Law and Business Strategy. The law firm that I started in 2017 is Rational Unicorn Legal Services. I don’t really like how sometimes the legal profession is either inaccessible or arrogant or contentious or immediately adversarial. And I knew that I wanted something to be fine.

    And the idea of a rational unicorn is that you are a dreamer and a realist at the same time. And essentially, essentially that’s what I am. And working with small business owners and nonprofits, the idea was for everyone to be a rational unicorn as well. To be someone who dreams big dreams, but also does your your homework and getting the paperwork done, being realistic about resources, but also continuing to dream.

    So a rational unicorn was or is a. Person who dreams while doing a reflective analysis of who they’re and where they’re trying to go. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love that. And you have some of the creative, most creative logos I’ve ever seen. I think people really need to take a look at that, the websites in the show notes, but such a creative way to look at loss.

    Something refreshing and full disclosure, I am have been a client of yours. And I think what attracted me part of it was that as a small business owner, somebody who’s trying to do the right thing, but do it with creativity and, but I can joy and to do things a little bit differently, but still have some guardrails so we don’t get into trouble.

    And you’ve done a great job of that. 

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. Thank you. I’ve definitely enjoyed it. I think the legal profession and a lot of other service professionals in general they’re taught to take on a sort of persona or character. And I really wanted to be myself as a lawyer. I didn’t want to have two personas.

    I didn’t want to, put on a suit every day and wear a tie every day. There’s times where I do wear a suit and put on a tie. If it’s appropriate, but this sort of idea of creating someone outside of yourself because the profession is asking you to do that, I didn’t really wanna do that.

    I also, I see business law and business formation as a form of economic justice, and

    When I help people with forming or creating businesses or nonprofits, we’re doing community building. And so it’s essentially it’s business law, but it’s public interest law. I think having fun logos or slogans and having a business model that works, that the community can trust. For example, in the legal field, most people, what they know is, give me a $5,000 retainer and I’m gonna bill you every 15 minute call or email or your time is up. You owe more money. And I tried and still try to cut through that to treat clients as humans and to be aware of what they’re going through, and also to not have surprises with billing.

    So it’s very much pay as you go, here’s your flat fee project and how can I help you? And that extends to not just business formation or contract reviewing, but what are your goals as a business owner? And do you want me to help you create a social enterprise? Let’s actually talk about that.

    So that, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: yes, we’re 

    Michael Jonas: talking about how the structure relates to their values as well. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. And what do you see as the problems to be solved as you work with for-profit businesses, nonprofits, organizations. What have you seen? What’s been changing? Positive and negative in your Yeah.

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. So that’s a good question. So generally, one of the things I see is that the business landscape the ecosystem, whether it’s we have a lot of really great ecosystem partners, but how, business Oregon links to prosper links to, small business office and. Innovation hub and we we have a lot of things going on now, and I think it’s really difficult for people to figure out where to go for help or what that organization does. It’s also a lot to figure out what the Secretary of State does or BOLI (Bureau of Labor and Industries) or the Department of Employment.

    The biggest thing I see and saw then, but also still see is this it’s like a, an overwhelm of not knowing how all the pieces fit together.

    And I would like to see for one, for that to be more systematized and make it so that people can, whether they’re already here or whether they’re moving to Oregon, it’s very clear how all the pieces fit together. So I would love to see that. I’d also love to see more resource sharing. I. We have the most amazing people here doing the most amazing work.

    But we’re all trying to do too much or don’t know what the other party’s doing. And that’s abundance mentality of really we need to collectively figure out what we have and what we need and how we can help. In terms of specifics, like during this time for small businesses one of the issues I see right now is.

    Staffing and an issue of tariffs, but one of them is that, the profit margin for small businesses has always been really tough. And then when you add in SBA loans from the pandemic or other loans that they’re paying, and then some of ’em also have. Commercial leases that even though we had the commercial lease moratorium, that’s still money owed to the landlord.

    So they either have a balloon payment at the end of the lease, or they’re paying more per month. So when you take the really low profit margin of a business and then you add on top of that an SBA loan and or payments to the landlord, in addition to what the monthly rent. Or was as planned. It makes it really hard. The math doesn’t math. For small business ownership. We also have some of the highest small business taxes in the nation. So anyways, so that this sort of putting it together resource wise and then also putting it together financially, those are really difficult.

    From the nonprofit world. A couple things. One of ’em is that cities and counties who no longer do those social services that are, that have contracted with nonprofits for 15, 20, 30 years. Those are services that are primarily federally funded. Or federal money then comes to state money, then goes to city or county.

    We have a really hard, a really difficult problem or reality we’re facing where if these nonprofits doing social services that are crucial, can’t survive the city and county no longer have the funds or the infrastructure to do those services. And so we really have three choices and we need to have these serious conversations with nonprofits of.

    Are you narrowing your focus? Or what is your focus or purpose? Are you consolidating or are you closing? And making a decision on which of those you’re doing and doing that in a respective manner. And then one more thing, I know I talk a lot. One more thing is 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: it’s good 

    Michael Jonas: the business ecosystem is set up for, for-profit organizations, right?

    So we have. The Small Business Administration Act that created the small business administration and then we get score and SBDC and things like that. There is no federal nonprofit administration or organization. And so a lot of the ecosystem partners that we have, they don’t help nonprofit organizations.

    And it actually should be the other way around because we’re expecting people who are doing services. Through a nonprofit to somehow have experience with business and then all, and then not have access to those resources. But then also to know nonprofit DOJ or IRS compliance rules. And so we’re not being good stewards of public funds because we’re not giving nonprofits what they need to succeed.

    And I’m terribly worried about that because it was bad before. And then now as we get into sort of a lack of funding we really need to figure out how to fund technical assistance for nonprofits. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That makes sense. And we’re speaking in January of 2026 and nonprofits themselves can be an all volunteer, no one paid organization to.

    Large, like the Gates Foundation or something is also a nonprofit. And how do you work with those clients and what are some of the greatest needs that they have out outside of the funding, but also what do you see as the greatest needs that they didn’t understand and that you as an attorney are helping them?

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. And sometimes lately I’m doing law and strategy. In the sense of somebody will call me and say, we lost our funding. How do we continue to do this program? And then advising them on restricted versus unrestricted funds or 

    How to do this program with a community, another community organization.

    And so having a community partnership agreement. In terms of, what I see or what I’ve been helping with, I think besides these funding issues, one of them is scalability. And so we often see an organization that has done a really great thing and it should be plotted. It’s you did a shelter or you did a really great program to, to feed elderly or whatnot.

    When we give them more money because they’ve met their value proposition, we don’t necessarily know if they have the ability to hire or scale in the way that a business would and a nonprofit is a corporation, just like any other corporation. Granted it’s not about shareholders and dividends, but we’re assuming that the scalability is there.

    And one of the things that I can help with is. How do you upsize or downsize and how do you do so legally? And that could be advising on hiring employees versus contractors. That could be on having the right contracts or looking at what the funds that they have are and what the rules are about funding.

    Can we hire someone for this amount of hours? Is that. These restricted funds. And so we have to go back and review and see if that’s the case. The other thing is staff and board dynamics. A lot of nonprofits, they don’t realize that the power always starts with the board. Like you were saying.

    Some nonprofits have volunteers only. The board is the steward of the funds for that particular public purpose. And so the board has to then vote to hire a program manager or executive director, and then in doing so, they have to tell the executive director what authority they have, whether that’s hiring or firing or authority to sign contracts.

    There’s a lot of confusion in organizations. Who is in charge and how do the board and staff work together? And what happens is all of that infighting sometimes is needed or it just is. But if it’s getting in the way of actually doing the purpose or doing the good, then we have a problem. So I see a lot of infighting and I think if we just clarify roles and responsibilities and power structures.

    Then the processes will play out a lot better. So that’s one. Another one is organizations have bylaws from 10, 15 years ago, and the bylaws, at the time were approved by the DOJ or whomever, but they’re not operational. They don’t give people an idea of. What kinds of committees do we have and or they don’t incorporate other documents, which they can incorporate, community guidelines or how do we do board recruitment? So basically a lot of nonprofits, they have documents that, like my attorney wrote, or I got this from someone 15 years ago, and it doesn’t actually, have applications to their everyday life. And I think that that’s a big mistake because we now more than ever need to capture what our collective rules are for how we’re doing that particular service or public purpose item. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And I think also a lot of us don’t know what we don’t know and bring it back to Oregon and I believe a lot of states with big cities and big corporations.

    Also have this as well, where it’s the collective number of small companies that are actually the economic engine of the state, and it’s that collectivity that matters. The total dollar amount that comes from small is, is a lot. And keeping those businesses healthy individually feeds into part of that.

    It also makes communities strong. I find it interesting though that. Each of us has our own perception of what a small business is, or a small nonprofit. But the SBA says 5,000,050 employees, no more than that is small. And yet there’s so many that have maybe five people or less solopreneurs, and there’s so many of them.

    So that term small is defined differently according. To who with whom you’re speaking and what the SBA says, but that also guides funding in some ways or at least it used to. And I was just wondering if you could speak to that a little bit and how you see the world being small with nonprofits and for-profits and what makes a community strong and when it’s weak, how can we help what can these community members do?

    Michael Jonas: Yeah you raise a good point and those are good questions. And both Portland and Oregon as a whole we’re small business economies. We also have a very big nonprofit sector. I think it’s like 12 to 15% of. The economy is somehow nonprofit related. And I don’t know the specific statistic on that, but 

    One of the things that we can do is we focus a lot on startups and I love startups and I’m involved in startups, but. It’s not always about startups and exiting, it’s about starting up and then working on sustainability and scalability. So we’re often chasing, what’s this tech company? What’s this expensive tech company that can come here and then pay taxes?

    Or we need another Nike, we need another whale, and that’s great. Or we need other Dutch brothers or Tillamook or salt and straw. But what if instead the focus was. As we’re giving you this ecosystem help, we’re gonna identify who wants to franchise or who wants to grow in that nature. And then we’re incubating businesses.

    And this sort of incubation or focus on that would help us create businesses here that wanna stay because they receive the incubation, but also the support that they’ve received in growing would be value proposition oriented or proof in the pudding of this is where I grew and this is where I had the support to grow.

    So I think that businesses leave or they don’t start, or this sort of idea of churn and burn startup. I think we need to reevaluate that. I think that we often try to piece together. Small mom and pop store or mother and daughter store with venture capital and exiting, and there’s more to it.

    There’s the story and there’s their survival, and there is. How to get them and maybe they wanna just have one location and that’s fine, but we want them to be able to stay in their commercial lease which in itself is a difficult thing. Or maybe we find out that they want have locations all over America, instead of us focusing so much on startup and exit and on that big whale, I would love it if the city started thinking, who are the people that we want to help become the big whale. And that’s one thing we can start doing. Another thing nonprofit related is technical assistance for nonprofits.

    Another thing is encouraging shared use of commercial spaces. We often talk about downtown and downtown’s empty. And the reality is that some of these commercial spaces are.

    Someone cannot have money to run their business, pay their staff pay for inventory. Even if they’re doing really well, that idea that they’re gonna make it work. I know full-time business owners who also have another job because they don’t have enough money made from their business to pay all their bills.

    So the idea or the concept would be encouraging commercial landlords. To have two or three tenants in a building and they would end up reaching the amount of money that’s owed for that lease. And then Portland would love it. So we would go into a place and it would be, a coffee shop and a plant shop and a record store, and they would have less of a burden.

    For having the commercial speed lease. They’d have a commercial space. If they do really well, they can leave that space and go onto another space instead of having empty buildings everywhere. I think that the city should do a better job at encouraging shared use of spaces. So that’s something I think another one is we have a lot of education and a lot of resources, but as I said.

    If they don’t all piece together, I would love to know what people do and what they don’t do. I’d love to have more clarity on the ecosystem and have someone systematize it. Some of that also means we need urgency there’s not a lot of triage available for, for-profits or nonprofits.

    For example, if I tell someone who’s about to close, you should look into this leadership program, that’s great. And maybe the leadership program’s good, but they don’t have, they don’t have six, six weeks. Six months. They literally, right now they’re about to close the restaurant, or literally right now they’re a lot, they’re about to close their nonprofits.

    So we need to have real adult conversations about businesses. Nonprofits where we create an environment of vulnerability and we create an environment of community partnerships and resourcing. And I don’t think that we’ve done that. We are here to help and we do have a wishful thinking attitude, but that does not match the time that we’re in at all.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, indeed. He’s spoken about some real things and the shifts from COVID as well. There were often those commercial places were full of people doing service type of work, and discovered that remote work is also very viable and except perhaps consumer goods and places where you have to be on site, manufacturing, restaurants, retail sales, that remote work.

    It can actually be healthy for a company. It keeps people, they can expand their reach about where the talent is. So there’s a lot of shifts that have happened that aren’t only political, but came just from having a pandemic as well. Yeah. And we’ve learned from that good and bad, but we’ve learned from that a little bit and what the possibilities are.

    Michael Jonas: Some of what we learned, we unfortunately forgot right away. Yes. And that’s the sad nature of America sometimes. But one of the things we learned, for example, is that a lot of business owners they’re not their own employee. They’re taking owner distributions or 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. 

    Michael Jonas: Their work is contractor based, and so none of them were paying into an unemployment fund.

    And so during the pandemic, the state of Oregon had to create a pandemic unemployment fund. The government has not caught up with e-commerce or a freelance economy or contractor economy. They’ve not caught up with remote work. And so we have to modernize all those systems to actually match what the economy looks like.

    So I think that that’s really important. We also learned, about digital tech deserts. Do people have computers or internet if they’re gonna be working from home. We learned about daycare I also think we collectively are not remembering people in the pandemic and we’re not also.

    It things are a little bit too quick to go back to normal. I think that we should take a moment and be reflective on what we learned. I did see a lot of people learn about themselves and who they are and, I don’t wanna do this shitty job anymore. I wanna do my own business and I wanna lean into my own values.

    And that’s really exciting to have both then and now clients who are like. I want to take my business and make it into a social enterprise, or I’ve been doing this thing that I really don’t care about. I really, my heart is in this I’ve had a lot of clients who have expressed that and that’s really exciting that they learned that their way of life is important and that their values are important.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That can be really healthy. It’s not always easy to make a living, but they can get started that way. And that’s what you did as well. You created something that was important because of your values. And I was wondering also, what does it mean to you to be a benefit corporation for good certified company as a benefit corporation in Oregon?

    Michael Jonas: Yeah my previous law firm that I sold was a benefit company and then my current law firm law and business strategy is also certified benefit company. I take it really seriously, and I don’t mean seriously, as in stern, I mean as in if I’m gonna do it, I’m gonna do it. And with the triple bottom line, profit planet and people.

    I think a lot of times with law firms or with professional services, profit is always assumed or is the most important and I don’t really work well that way. And so being a benefit company helps with my values. I am very much into, if I’m not a lawyer. Helping people or solving problems and what am I doing?

    And yeah, I have bills to pay. I have student loan debt, I have a mortgage, I have a mom assisted living. I have a lot of, expenses. But I really feel that anybody can anybody can and should care about people and the planet. And I think someone might be like, well, oh, your law firm, how do you do that?

    Because they’re thinking of. If you’re a food company, you could recycle or, you could do things related to that. But I do this for me so that we are accountable. But also I do this so that my clients have an example so that they themselves can think about how they wanna be a benefit company or uphold these standards.

    And so I always ask people whether they’re benefit company certified or gonna do that or not. What’s your community piece? What’s your social enterprise piece? Is there a bigger why? And so some of the stuff we do is not just in our pricing model and me being on probably too many nonprofit boards.

    But in how we deliver services, we’re asking questions about. Who are we helping and why, and how does it affect community? We’re doing a lot of pro bono and low bono work. And we also are really focused on education. In addition to our seminar series, I give presentations all the time for last week I had three.

    I gave a presentation for the organ, coastal Community College, SBDC in Lincoln City. And then I gave Fantastic at that same night, I gave a presentation to queer health service providers. And then the following day for NAMC for National Association of Minority Contractors.

    I talked about, I love 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: that, 

    Michael Jonas: how to go from residential contracting to commercial and what the risks were, and we’re constantly thinking about the work we do. And how does the education piece play into community? And so when we’re helping clients not only are we reflective upon our values, but and if people don’t have those values and they don’t wanna work with us, that’s fine.

    There’s. There’s a law firm for them. There’s a law firm for people who want this sort of legal work. But I think that it’s easier to build community when you’re collectively all agreeing to do your best in terms of how to affect community. So when we work or partner with other organizations, when we all have shared goals, which are at a further community it’s easier to work with ’em and build something special.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love that. And what states does Narwhal operate in? 

    Michael Jonas: Yeah, so we currently operate in Washington and Oregon for business services, for nonprofit services, for existing nonprofits or for intellectual property trademarking or copywriting. Those are federal. So we have clients for IP and nonprofit work across the country.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s fantastic. So I want everyone listening to know that because we have listeners who might be from out of state as well. I think Michael, you are more in tune to what it takes to understand legislation policy making things than the average person by a long shot. And I was wondering if you could speak to that a little bit, because you’ve spoken about federal funding and how funding rolls down to the state, but also.

    People in states and federal are making decisions that affect businesses. So there’s policy and legislation. Yeah. I was wondering if you could speak to that a bit and if you want to about your propinquity to politics. 

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. So one of the things is that folks know is these executive orders about DEI related.

    Communications. This administration is saying that sometimes First Amendment rights are considered domestic terrorism, which is completely upside down and wild. But I have clients that either do DEI work or had to completely scrub their website or change all of their services in order to not get in trouble or to continue getting funding.

    So there’s that piece where, the work that both I do. And so that relates to this I am not an immigration attorney, but I prepared a kind of a guide for the Oregon Farmer’s Market Association for, oh their member markets, so that if ICE shows up to your market. Here’s what you should know about public and private areas.

    Here’s what you should know about administrative versus judicial warrants. Here, here’s some advice from a team perspective of how to organize your team. That’s definitely new. I mentioned tariffs earlier. I tried learning tariffs. I tried learning about tariffs for several weeks and then I just gave up because they kept changing.

    One of the main things I’ve been telling clients lately is kind of sad but true. I say I’m gonna give you the rules, but they could change tomorrow. And then I also say I’m gonna give you the rules, but they may not be followed. So in no time in my career have I had to give those two disclaimers of these rules could change or not be followed.

    In terms of the economy, so the one big beautiful bill or HR one or one big ugly bill, whatever people wanna call it there’s a lot of cuts to things, but the Medicaid cuts are somewhat scary because there are whole health organizations or hospitals that rely on Medicaid funding.

    And what that does is it causes unnecessary strain on already resources that were few and far between. And so helping clients have that real conversation of, okay, we know that you’re not gonna get this money. Do you have a development plan? Or you, I know you need to lay people off. How can we do that in the most efficient way?

    And. I think a lot of what I’m doing is resource building making organizational organizations stronger making sure that if they’re audited or if they’re questioned that they have their ducks in a row so that there’s not a pretext being used to close ’em. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah, indeed. And I also find that you are so good at explaining and through my life I’ve had attorneys for a variety of things.

    Sometimes properties, sometimes. Drawing up wills, things of that nature. And sometimes the legalese is just something I can’t grasp and I start to need pictures and visuals and every time I’ve spoken with you or gone to one of your classes or a webinar or heard you speak, it is down to earth. This is why it’s important.

    This is what you need to know, and it you do it in such a way that it’s not speaking down to people at all. Speaking in a way that is comprehensive and understandable, and that’s something in the legal field that I think is somewhat rare, and I really, really appreciate that. I’m gonna switch gears on you a little bit and ask you what makes you optimistic.

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. One of the things that makes me optimistic is seeing the community come together. Whether it’s a march, whether it’s a community fundraiser. Fee. I like the stuff when they’re cutting SNAP benefits. I saw all kinds of people in the community coming together. I’ve seen I’ve, I am seeing and see neighbors who are asking their neighbors, what can I do for you?

    Do you eat food? Do you need a ride? So I think the optimism I get is not necessarily always from large governmental things. Everyday people standing up and doing things for others. I get optimism when I see not the shootings happening in Minnesota and how ice is ice asking, acting, excuse me.

    But when I see Minnesotans, coming out and below freezing temperatures to. Not only alert if ICE is there, but to see how their neighbors are doing and then to protest in the streets. So I’m optimistic for that. I’m also optimistic in the sense of we’ve been through times in America that have been horrible and catastrophic.

    And I’m not saying that we’re not. A time of fascism because we are. And we, it’s arrived. It’s no longer uncertain times this is the time. But I am optimistic when I read about what could be, or I think about what if we rebuilt America in 2028 and we, we untethered corporate greed for moral imperatives and we had legislation or an amendment.

    Get rid of what happened with Citizens United and calling corporations people. So I still believe in not only the American dream in terms of equity and the social contract that as America. I also believe that there could be a time in a couple years where we come to our senses and just decide everyone needs universal healthcare and everyone needs a clean environment. And these, yes, these are political and there’s ways to do them, but really these are human decency related things. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And what can people do, even if it’s something small to be activists like that, but also to support themselves if they’re a business owner and to support local.

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. I’ll do a shameless plug of my new podcast called All American. Why? And you can listen to that and the goal with that is I’m asking questions that America is either afraid to ask or has gone in circles with for years. So I think the reason why I bring that up is people can continue to ask why and demand more.

    I think that is, i’m not saying it’s our fault because it’s not, but I think we need to flip the script. I think we’ve enabled power structures to act as they want. In terms of how can you get involved ask your neighbor how they’re doing. It is literally these small acts I think are most important now.

    And also identify people in your community that may feel as if they can’t leave their house. They like my trans friends, they’re worried about people not thinking that they should exist. I think, we’re taught right now or they’re trying to teach us that empathy is bad, which is bullshit.

    And they’re sort of hating people and then telling us that they’re good Christians and that they’re patriotic. What I’m gonna tell you is that the opposite is true. Having leaning into love and leaning into empathy is what we need to do is we need to look at people in our community and ask them what they need and how we can help.

    And we need to remind them that we love them and that we are here for them and we see them as they are and that and whether that’s someone who is queer or an immigrant, or. Someone who just feels all alone and is having a mental health crisis. We need to remind people that, that on the opposite of hate is love.

    And that if we all prescribe to this social contract of America, you don’t have to be the same as someone else, but 

    You should. You should see them and love them and make them feel like they have the safety that they need. And so I struggle with this because we’re being told right now that hate is just a difference of opinion or that it’s negotiable.

    And I know that sometimes it’s hard to talk to someone who doesn’t believe in truth or fact or creates their own truth. My thing is, yes, we have those people, but I also want you to focus on people who might feel like they are alone or in danger every day. And all it takes is for you to check in on them and see if they’re okay and ask them what they need.

    To me, that is the most tangible thing that people can do right now. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you. Thank you so much. And another podcaster once said that. Running a business and supporting a business is a form of resistance. And I think listening to you that empathy is also a form of resistance, and empathy builds capacity.

    And I know from living a lot in the outdoors and being in open spaces that the most important strength to keep a forest healthy or an environment healthy is biodiversity. And diversity in our communities is the same. It’s a form of resistance, a form of strength, a form of, and empathy. Empathy is a, it binds, it really helps people.

    Michael Jonas: And whether you believe in, in, God or Mother Earth or creation, story, science, whatever you believe in, right? Big Bang Theory. We are all in it together. We are all related, we are, we’re all on earth. We’re all using the same resources. I’m not an expert on religion, but really to me, environmentalism is one of the most godly things.

    The other thing that is extremely godly is being yourself. And we’re now having people who are fighting against. People who were created and there’s a beauty in diversity that the people who are spewing such hate are missing out on and are not realizing that the beauty or sanctity of diversity is actually like what you said makes us stronger and makes us better.

    And so that’s really unfortunate, and I think that the thing you said about business and business being a form of economic justice and resistance, a lot of times people who start businesses, they can’t be themselves at a job place or they feel like they don’t have a voice or they can’t create what they want, or they’re in an abusive job relationship.

    And the act of business formation allows you to be you doing the thing that you care about, and there is great power in that. And also the public now, as you probably know, not only do they support sustainable businesses, we really like businesses that come from people who have authentic stories.

    And we see the person in the business that they’re forming and growing. Yeah, for anyone listening if people are telling you not to be yourself and they’re giving you hate, I’m gonna tell you be exactly who you are and that there are people who love you and see you.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. Thank you so much. And before the last question, how can people reach you? 

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. I am on Instagram in a variety of ways, but Narwhal Law and Biz BIZ strategy, you can find us on Instagram. You can go to NarwhalStrategy.com. So Instagram, website. I’m on LinkedIn, and all the things. Feel free to reach out.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And everyone, also remember that the law services are available if your issue is federal, no matter where you are in the US.

    Michael Jonas: We’re also in the process of building out something called Narwhal Pod. Narwhal Pods. And the idea with that is to present holistic service providers as they are, and then like an integrative health approach.

    You can find your people. Based on their values. So check out narwhal pod.com. We were very blessed to receive a Portland State University MBA team of four that are doing their capstone project to help us with the narwhal pods. I’m excited about that. And yeah, just trying to grow community in all the ways possible, and that’s what’s needed right now.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love that. And for the record, Mighty Epiphyte Counsulting – soon to be renamed – is a member of the Narwhal Pod, as are some other amazing people that we know. The final question is, if you could have dinner up to a table of four, so you could have three guests, one, two, or three guests, your choice, living or dead, who would they be and why?

    Michael Jonas: That’s really hard. It’s 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: hard. I know. 

    Michael Jonas: I think right now in the moment that we’re in, I think I wrote down three people because I knew you were gonna ask this question. I think one of them would be Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Another one would be Harvey Milk, and then another one would be Mar Martin Luther King, Jr.

    But yeah, that’s 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: probably put a table, 

    Michael Jonas: that’s a difficult question. But I think in the time that we’re in, those are the three people that I would love to have dinner with and would love to see them communicate with each other.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I’m trying to imagine how profound that would be. And they crossed over, not generationally, but they were all alive at the same time for a little bit.

    In different areas doing different things, and yet strong values driven to peacefully make change. 

    That’s a beautiful thing. 

    Michael Jonas: Yeah. Thank you. It’s, I could think of a long list, so it’s hard to narrow down, but, I would love to see like Greta Thunberg interact with MLK, like interesting conversations of that nature. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Wouldn’t it be amazing? I know this is a hard question and it’s why I like it. We could answer it different ways in a different day as well. There’s all sorts of reasons to wanna reach back in history, but also connect with now. Yeah. So Michael, thank you so much everyone.

    The the links verbalized are also in the show notes. We really would love for you to interact with Narwhal and one of those educational offerings, which are often online so you can access them anywhere, the podcast. And look at the Narwhal pod. I’m Kim Allchurch Flick. I love helping businesses do more for good, whether it’s certifying or just really think about your impacts and being able to measure them, express them, and share them with the world.

    Thank you all signing off, and I hope you have a great week. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Michael Jonas

    Michael Jonas sits on a park bench, smiling at the camera.

    Michael Jonas, JD, MBA is a licensed attorney, community advocate, and champion for equitable economic and social systems. Throughout his career, he has focused on strengthening small businesses, nonprofits, and mission-driven organizations through accessible legal services, legal education, strategic guidance, and values-aligned support. Michael continues this work by empowering community organizations through direct legal representation, consulting, training, and legal-adjacent education rooted in clarity, practicality, and community care.

  • Building the Infrastructure for an Equitable Economy with Paul Lovejoy, founder of Stakeholder Enterprise

    Building the Infrastructure for an Equitable Economy with Paul Lovejoy, founder of Stakeholder Enterprise

    Paul Lovejoy, founder of Stakeholder Enterprise and a member of the Social Enterprise Alliance committee, joins Kim Allchurch Flick to talk about his journey toward creating a more ethical and sustainable financial system.

    Paul shares his transformative experiences during the 2008 financial crisis, the importance of building an economy based on nature’s principles, and his innovative ideas for standardizing reporting in investment crowdfunding.

    The discussion also explores the need for universal access to capital, the role of regenerative investments, and the potential for using digital currency to create equitable economic infrastructures.

    The episode closes with reflections on the importance of collaboration, self-sufficiency, and visionary leadership.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome

    01:17 Paul Lovejoy’s Journey to Equitable Economy

    02:28 Understanding Economies Through Nature

    05:13 Challenges in Funding Social Enterprises

    06:04 Investment Crowdfunding and Crypto

    09:08 Standardized Reporting for Productive Investment

    13:30 Building Infrastructure for Equitable Investment

    21:53 Vision for a Regenerative Economy

    27:12 Global Economies and Local Impact

    28:46 Challenges of Small Investments

    29:49 Making Ethical Investments Accessible

    31:56 Innovations in Eco-Friendly Products

    33:44 The Role of Capital in Clean Tech

    36:09 Economic Injustice and Compassion

    38:17 Universal Access to Capital

    44:30 Hope for a Sustainable Future

    46:31 The Importance of Marketing for Ethical Choices

    48:19 Final Thoughts and Contact Information

    49:05 Dinner with Gandhi and Satoshi Nakamoto

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. I’m delighted to be here with Paul Lovejoy, a friend and someone who I share a committee membership with on the Social Enterprise Alliance. Paul Lovejoy is the founder of Stakeholder Enterprise, the nation’s first community investment advisory firm.

    After navigating the 2008 financial crisis and facing deep personal and professional challenges, Paul began a powerful journey of reflection in renewal. That experience shaped his commitment to building a more ethical and sustainable financial system that truly serves people and planet. So our topic today is building the infrastructure for an equitable economy.

    Welcome Paul. It’s so good to see you. 

    Paul Lovejoy: It’s great to be here, Kim. Thank you for the invitation and I love talking about equitable economies, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: and that’s an important. Aspect. We are recording this in January of 2026, where daily money is a big topic and a variety of perspectives, and I really appreciate you being here with the topic of e equitable economy.

    And describe to us what your journey has been and what arriving to the idea of equitable economy means to you. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah, let’s take a step back and really ask ourselves what an economy is. And that’s where my journey started in this specific how do we build infrastructure for that?

    So it was the lockdowns, COVID lockdowns just happened and the guy on the TV said The economy we’re shut, the economy is shutting down. And my older son, who was eight at the time, he looked at me and he said, dad. What’s an economy And so I gave him the standard answer. Oh, it’s buyers and sellers markets, resources.

    And he seemed content with the answer, it felt so much more at the time, with it just felt, and I wasn’t satisfied with that answer. I went down a Google Rabbit hole and started looking up definitions of economy. And the history of an economy. And what I’ve found was really shift my paradigm on how I looked at economies.

    Humanity’s very first economy was called a foraging economy. And when I read that I was like, whoa. Okay. I am a human being and I’m forging for what? Mushrooms that don’t kill me, using a primitive weapons to hunt. I’m, and in this forging economy I’m probably starving at some time, and it made me think that I was like, oh my gosh.

    I’m an animal in nature, in a foraging economy. And so that’s when it hit me. I was like, oh, our economy is a natural system. And that reframed everything how I approached and view an economy. Essentially the, when I kept going down this road, I saw that an economy is essentially resource distribution.

    And then I asked, well, how does nature. Handle resource distribution, and that’s when a whole, answers started to reveal themselves. Nature works in layers. They don’t try and do everything at once like human economies do. They’re universal infrastructure.

    Happens before competition. And when you look at nature, you see that every seed gets soil before competing for sunlight. Every organism gets water before competing for other resources. And so it’s allowed me to see that. Oh, okay. So there is a bigger system here and the way human beings are doing it is going against nature’s principles.

    Which is the reason why we’re having all this concentration of wealth, exploitation and all these. So I came up with these five different layers. But here’s the crazy thing. The first layer wasn’t the bottom one that I, that I. Discovered and in fact, I didn’t even really understand the layers.

    The, how I came into this space was I saw I thought businesses were the root problem. These corporations, they’re extractive, they’re for-profit. They have a terrible purpose. And so I went into social enterprise. I joined the Social Enterprise Alliance where, you know, you and I, Kim, we were on a committee.

    And I thought, okay, if we can get companies with a different purpose, instead of the purpose being maximizing shareholder value, what if the purpose was to solve social or environmental problems? I was like, okay, this is a solution. Regenerative businesses, this is what we do.

    Social enterprise. Okay, so I am all in on social enterprises, and then I see that, oh, they’re not getting funded. Oh, this is a problem. We need to fund these social enterprises. So this is when I started to get more into the investment space. And this was 2017 or so when I started getting in the investment space and 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And 

    Paul Lovejoy: really understanding oh, okay. How do we fund social enterprises? And the really only way to fund social enterprises was through investment crowdfunding, because you can’t invest in a social enterprise on the stock market. It doesn’t exist. So I was like how do we fund these social enterprises?

    Okay. Investment crowdfunding, it’s the only way the public can actually fund a business. That creates value. So it’s so then I was like, okay, this is great. I found a way to fund social enterprises, but then as a financial planner, I’m seeing in my inbox all of these notifications about crypto currency planning for your financial your financial advisory practice.

    And I was like, crypto planning. And I started looking into crypto and I saw that Bitcoin gets better returns, just speculating. So essentially you’re putting your investment dollars in Bitcoin. And it just stays there. There’s no value that’s being created but your money is appreciating 25% a year in Bitcoin versus a productive investment in a social enterprise where you can generate 10.

    15, 20% returns, you can probably not more like 10%, which is something I’m doing regularly. You can’t compete 10% with a 25% at Bitcoin. And so I was like, oh. See what you mean? 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. 

    Paul Lovejoy: So there’s a different problem. It’s not just investment into social enterprises because people aren’t going to invest in social enterprises when they can.

    They can just put their money in speculation. And then that’s when I really realized that’s not even the deepest problem. Our entire public market is based on investment market, is based on speculation. So consider this Kim. There is $43 trillion in retirement accounts right now. That’s all capital that is.

    Speculating, it’s not being used for productive investment. Instead, when you in have invest in the stock market, you’re trading ownership papers. You’re saying, I own this company and I wanna buy this other company because I think it’ll be more valuable in the future. You’re not taking your investment dollar and saying.

    Okay. Hire, 10 more people for your social enterprise so you can serve your community better. It’s not saying, okay, I’m gonna fund this community kitchen that’s going to do classes and provide all kind of value to the community. That’s a productive investment that’s not happening with 43.

    Trillion dollars, and here’s the crazy thing. We’re in our poli political system, we’re arguing over how we can allocate our tax dollars. Meanwhile, the capital that we actually do have control over, we just let Wall Street decide whatever we want to do with it. That $43 trillion.

    We have control over our retirement accounts, but we don’t know that we can use it for productive investment. So I was trying to bring in people into this productive investment and I realized that’s never gonna work. That’s never gonna work. What I need to do is bring the productive investment to the retirement capital.

    So that’s when I, realize that there needs to be standardized reporting within investment crowdfunding. So I’m getting a little bit ahead of myself here, but essentially everything I just said in the story describes a different layer in nature. And I have for the listening audience, a complete breakdown of the framework I just talked about.

    So it, it provides a visual to see what Layer does and how it affects in our economy and what’s broken about it right now. So I’ll give you, I’ll give you an example. At the very bottom layer is I call store of value. Okay, so in nature, this is the soil, water, air, sunlight, the foundational substrate.

    This is universal access for all organisms and resources cycle back through decomposition, supply adapts to ecosystem needs. Now in our current system, we use US dollar or gold as the store of value. Now, US dollar violates conservation principles because we can print it infinitely.

    There’s there’s no there’s no conservation print. It’s infinite. And that doesn’t. In nature that doesn’t exist. And the other store of value that humans have used is gold. But this violates lifecycle boundaries because of perpetual accumulation. It, you never can ha someone who has gold as the very first base layer they’re gonna get that it’s only gonna accumulate over time and create dynasties.

    And so that’s the problem with the store of value. Our layer, first layer. Now in a, that seems to mean 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: wow. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah. In a regenerative model, we’re talk, we need to have universal capital substrate. So a store of value with lifecycle boundaries fixed apply with dynamic adaptability.

    In other words think of an island. Let’s say water is is that store of value, okay. Water. Now, on some in through earth there, there’s the same amount of water that there’s always been on planet Earth, but it changes through climate. So when it’s very cold, the water levels will decrease because it all freezes and the island all of a sudden gets more land.

    Now, when the, when it changes, then and the planet heats up the water rises. And so now there is less land, but it’s still a fixed supply that’s dynamically adaptable. So I know that. It’s probably a little bit complicated, trying to say this. But essentially we need to have a store of value that mimics.

    Our natural systems and we don’t have that now. I have on my own put out a proposal for a universal collateral token with 125 year lifecycle, a population responsive supply where everyone receives one token at the age of 18. So anyways that’s the infrastructure part that, that we would need.

    So I know I’ve been talking for a long time here. You probably have some questions, so I’ll stop now. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I’m enthralled and I, my knowledge of economics is minuscule what I hear in the news, listening to economists speak. But what comes to mind is. The thing that I’ve heard most is if you get 10 economists in a room, you’ll get 10 different opinions and that makes it difficult to understand economics and what you’ve done is for the first time really bring some clarity to the origins.

    Also what that can mean for our future if we think of economics as, dare I say it, but perhaps a force for good and. And how to think of it in those terms. So what does that look like moving forward as you’re creating this? What kind of are you, what kind of response are you getting? How far has it gone?

    What, yeah, what does the journey look like? 

    Paul Lovejoy: So I’ll tell you a little bit about this year. So at March of this year or the last day of February of 2025. I finished a experiment where I made one micro productive investment every day. For 366 days straight. All right. It was a this challenge, this experiment I did, and the average investment amount was about $30 a day $12,000 total.

    And I wanted to show, demonstrate that productive investment can beat Wall Street, and by the end of the, year I had hundreds of investments with loans that had different terms and each platform had different ways of reporting the, these returns and terms of service. So it was impossible for me to.

    Track all of these loans without manually going into a spreadsheet and adding every single payment. I went on a webinar the Crowdfunding Professional Association. They had me on a webinar to talk about this challenge. And I mentioned this and I got a email from someone who watched the webinar saying I’m having the same problem.

    I have hundreds of investments. And I don’t know what to do. So we got together and we started talking about it, and over the summer we came up with an idea of what if all of these investment, these crowdfunding investment platforms, all had the same export where you can download a spreadsheet.

    With all your investments, but it had the same format, the same columns, so the columns were all the same. And the payment schedule, it was all the same. How it would, and that way we could actually calculate our return and we could track our portfolio across dozens of platforms and we’re like, oh, this is a great idea.

    And then at the end of the summer I met with an institutional wealth manager manages 2 billion in impact capital. And the conversation was how come, how come, institutional capital really, in this retirement capital, how come it can’t get into productive investment?

    And his answer was immediate. He was like, oh, it’s standardized reporting. We can’t put money into this if we don’t know what kind of returns we’re getting and there’s no way to report it. And then I didn’t really put the pieces together. But all of a sudden that this standardized CSV down download spreadsheet was looking a lot bigger.

    All of a sudden we’re like, oh. And then a few months later I met with a colleague of mine who we’re we’re judges on a live pitch show together, and he has a fund in regulation crowdfunding in but he invests just in the equity deals, meaning there’s, it’s not loans, so there’s no need to really track consistently.

    And I was asking about his fund structure because I was considering starting a fund and but one with income and he said, well, it’s all about our, the standardized reporting of Form C, which all regulation crowdfunding companies need to provide data on their business, basic revenue and debt kind of stuff.

    And so that was the ba and that, that’s when it clicked for me. I was like, oh, so he bases this fund on the standardized reporting of regulation crowdfunding. If I. Had a fund that standardized reporting for the the loans and the, these other investments. Then I would be able to take it to retirement capital.

    So it kind, I lit. So what I did was. All of a sudden I can create a fund that retirement accounts can invest in by building rails, allowing retirement capital into productive investment markets. So I took this standard, I brought it to our professional industry a trade association, the crowdfunding Professional Association to get official backing.

    They love the idea. We’re in the process of doing official backing right now. I reached out to the top four. Crowdfunding, investment crowdfunding platforms that do these types of loan type investments. 

    About the, they all replied, they all answered, genuinely interested in doing this. So that’s where I’m at right now.

    Building actual infrastructure to bring in retirement capital into productive markets where social enterprises can get the funding they need.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: This is so exciting and it sounds like a first and a necessity for a brighter future for support of mission driven companies who are making strides in the world. So what do you see as the timeline, or what is your timeline for accessibility to this? 

    Paul Lovejoy: That’s a great question. It’s building infrastructure takes time.

    And I’m currently looking for partners to help me build infrastructure, my own advisory practice. I help inheritors who are struggling with or who have gone through, who have done the work. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Who 

    Paul Lovejoy: want to take the inheritance that they may feel has been gained by extractive means and use it regeneratively.

    And so that’s, those are the people who I am partnering with currently, to take on as advisory clients to help build some of this infrastructure. The timeline, it’s gonna take some years, but I would expect that. The standard, the CSV downloads standard can be adopted by the top four investment crowdfunding platforms.

    At the end of the year official adoption and the crowdfunding platforms. Now, this is me just speculating at this point, but this is what I see. This is what I envision. And then the following year I would build up the fund based on this tracker of and the data that I get from having this, these new, spreadsheets and, so we’re looking at about, I would say, wouldn’t it be a huge stretch that in five years I could build a fund where let’s say Vanguard or State Street or BlackRock can actually be able to invest in, and those are the ones that are managing retirement accounts. They’re already doing crypto kind of stuff. I don’t see why not productive investment in social enterprises. Why not have an ETF for that, and why not be the ones that build it? I’m not gonna be able to build this alone. That’s why I’m asking for partners.

    And makes sense. If anybody wants to download the asset that I’m offering, you could see maybe. You see a partnership opportunities in one of the layers. 

    And I, I would love to collaborate to get this thing built. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: It sounds timely as well. We’ve heard of green funds and things of that nature.

    One question I have for you also is donor advised funds, because you mentioned people who are inheriting. And I don’t understand fully how those work. But I’m curious and it seems like the potential is so great, but also the other point, which you brought up in the beginning is the need that often like small to middle sized social enterprise companies and particularly, and I’m gonna reflect on what I’ve seen in the Oregon area is those who are run by women.

    Minority groups, L-G-B-T-Q are often even more underfunded than other social enterprises. That’s, and how can we make it ethical and equitable? 

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah. That is the ultimate question from my point of view. It’s not about fixing a broken system. It’s about building alternative infrastructures based on nature’s principles.

    I love it. And that way, it can be done legally, ethically, and without confrontation. We don’t need to fight for it. We just need to build it. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. And have the tracking mechanisms and the reporting 

    Paul Lovejoy: we, yeah, that’s right. And those donors advise fund, they need standardized reporting too.

    All of the institutional capital needs standardized reporting. And so this is, it is a big deal. The thing is that there’s no money in this. To actually build the standardized reporting. I see a future for me to build it, not just because it’s going to build rails for production, but it’ll allow me to have a fund and that’s how I can make money.

    And there’s, there’s lots of layers within the layers. It’s good that we’re talking Kim, because it is hard to articulate. Something so big as an economy and so big as nature. It’s good that we’re having this conversation and, allowing, how to give this message, how do you, how do you do that?

    How do you, say this message where people will get it and wanna help build. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. And being visionary can be difficult to articulate, and I think you’re doing a really interesting and good job of it with that, those layers. But it also brings me to, Robin Wa Kim’s work and her books where she talks about extraction as being bad, but reciprocity as being good and how those economies of the First Nations peoples were.

    Really equitable and good. And she has a story in her book that talks about how and when white people came in and we’re looking at how how the First Nations people did things and they say, where do you store your food? And the people said, well, we’re Hunter, we’re gatherer. I even hear this in these times in I’ve heard some some chiefs speak about.

    How they’ve lived on the reservations and when they had more of, their natural land. They said, we didn’t think about storing things. He said, I if I kill an elk and my brother is picking carrots, we store it in the belly of our brother because it’s reciprocal and also about not being extractive, which really resonated with me.

    A lot that there is a huge difference between reciprocity. We can take and yet be reciprocal and do things that give back to, and help make the land and other people and other species healthier with some balance. But to not store something as much as to share it because everybody thrives and it’s like storing something in the belly of your brother.

    And I think what you’re talking about is. Storing money in the belly of social mission driven companies. 

    Paul Lovejoy: That’s right. Yeah. You’re absolutely right, Kim. I think that’s a great way to say it. And a great framing for it. And reciprocity is cyclical, that’s nature. Yes. And indigenous tribes, first people.

    That’s how their economies operated. It worked with natural principles. I think with the technology that we have today with the internet, it allows unique distribution that couldn’t possibly exist before this technology. And that’s what. An economy ultimately is, is resource distribution and having an internet that can distribute so easily.

    And not just that it’s also the governance aspect of it. Those First Nations tribes, they didn’t, you said, they didn’t say, okay, we need to kill this many Elks, or like a chief said that to ha no. If one brother he needed food, they would kill. They, it was done by, living within the ecosystem, you feel the demand pulling from the ecosystem.

    So you did it, it wasn’t a chief saying, okay, we need to kill three Elks this year. That’s also something that the internet is allowing, it’s allowing for decentralized cooperation where, we can put. Our money and essentially, voting with your dollars. We could vote with our dollars through these investments into social enterprises to shape how the future wants to be, and we don’t have those votes right now.

    What we do is we let Wall Street dictate where all this money goes. And what does Wall Street do? They put all that money in extractive corporations. No wonder our life is like this. That’s the way, wherever we want to have our future, that’s where we need to move the money. ‘Cause when we control where the money flows, we control what gets funded, what gets built, and what thrives.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That is such a good quote. How you want to have your future is where to put the money. I’m writing that down. What? I think about the world of social enterprise and B Corps and B Lab, and a lot of focus is on local, which is super important. And yet we live in global economies, and you and I are speaking from different time zones and different states, and yet there’s a commonality here.

    So in a way, local in some ways has become larger and. It’s still super personal and important. And as you see this in the future how do you see two things. One is there, there will still be people who have 4 0 1 Ks that have historically been mutual funds. If they can self-select, what could that be?

    But also a lot of small to medium businesses where. It’s very local, very grassroots. People are earning, but it’s not as structured or they don’t have the 401k avenue for building wealth. And we also know that there are people who have no generational wealth. So they are looking for opportunities to begin that for their future and their family’s future.

    And you mentioned also investing $30 a day. What if it was $30 a week or even $30 a month as a start, how do you see small being able to start to go down the road that you’re suggesting that’s good for their pockets, but also good for the planet and mission driven businesses. 

    Paul Lovejoy: From what I’ve discovered from my own work, it’s really difficult to try and get anybody to commit to any type of investment routine.

    Even a small one. It’s incredibly challenging and it’s not something that I’m gonna be focusing a lot of time on is trying to get. People to commit to investment habits. Yes, it’s so accessible. It’s never been this accessible to build wealth ethically. It’s never been with very little you $10 minimums.

    I can invest $10 a week, $10 a month. And something that, like in a community solar project, in a small if you want to contribute $10 to a $30,000 small business loan for a new oven, you could do that. The loan will be 11%. Paid monthly. That’s a good, that’s a good loan to have a good it’s mutual benefit and it’s incredibly easy.

    What’s difficult is doing that consistently, every week doing that. And so what’s lacking? Are auto investing mechanisms, and it’s just it requires so much effort for even a smaller person to come up with their financial plan and then to hire a financial planner that’s also expensive.

    If you are a do it yourselfer, you could, you can absolutely build wealth ethically and invest in. Things that actually create value and see it. You could see I was a part of that, it’s pretty beautiful to, to see that. But it’s not easy. So that’s the real, that’s the real challenge, and that’s why I think it’s so important just to if someone’s looking at their 401k option, like, oh, you know what?

    I wanna be in this. A fund that does productive investment in social enterprise, just like a box to check. That’s the only way things are gonna change. I, that’s the way I see it. Trying to change behavior. The, that’s why I was talking about, it’s not about fighting a system. It’s about building infrastructure that makes the ethical choice not only the obvious choice, but the easy one.

    I love that. Yeah. It’s like, I’m not gonna try and convince you that you need to stop using plastic. Instead, I’m gonna make an investment in a company that does plant-based plastic, and they do it so good, it’s gonna be much cheaper than petroleum plastic. And then as a consumer’s like, well, I’m not gonna buy this expensive plastic.

    I want the cheap plant plastic. I’m not, I didn’t have to convince that person to stop using plastic. I invested in the alternative that made it the easy choice. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, I love that. I love that. And I think we’re both seeing industries that are, and this is where I put a lot of my hope in the innovators that are doing that.

    And there are options that are we have now that we didn’t have even five years ago. And there are options coming that we don’t even know about. And to that point I’ll tell you a brief story about, I decided after Costco’s my husband’s happy place, but the laundry soap for two people, five gallons or whatever it was.

    But I decided I really wanna look for eco-friendly plastic free cleaning supplies and laundry. And I did an experiment where I found three companies at the time. Now there’s five or six even. That met that search requirement and I ran an experiment where every load of laundry and the trick is unscented, otherwise people will know there’s something changing.

    And all right, each load was with a different brand, including the Costco one, as I was trying to empty that five gallon plastic bottle and nobody noticed ’cause it was a secret, but I was running it through for quality control. And in the end I said, okay, I’ve emptied this five gallon plastic jug, and meanwhile there’s these disks that are plant-based and the packaging has zero plastic and I can keep it in a glass jar.

    Or the tin that they can provide takes up like a 10th of the space. The laundry’s just as clean because nobody said, Hey, this doesn’t look clean in six months of trial. Now I have zero plastic in cleaning and laundry because of innovators. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And then, wow, if we could invest, which companies would we wanna invest in?

    And he still goes to Costco, but there’s one, there’s a few items that don’t go in the cart, cleaning and laundry. So I think we can all do things like that, but I also think bringing it back to you and money is. I also see, like with incubators, and there’s a couple in the Northwest that are like incubators for clean tech that are coming up with some amazing things.

    But these companies aren’t gonna get off the ground without capital. So when we look to the future and some of these people are. Great problem solvers. They’re doing things like making plant-based, no plastic cleaning supplies, but taking it to other products or services or industries. And how do you envision the future where your money and how do we make that connection where the money you’re talking about and the thing, ways people can work with your system to support innovation as well as existing.

    Good companies so more and more of us can make a switch. ’cause the other thing I noticed was the cost differential. It’s about the same. I didn’t spend a whole bunch more, maybe a little bit, but not a lot more to transition to get the same result. 

    Paul Lovejoy: It sounded like that company needs to get more funding for marketing so they can get bigger, we’re talking about the same price, same everything.

    Consumers will pay a little bit more for an ethical choice. But it’s only it. You’re not gonna get widespread adoption unless you have really good marketing. And indeed, you need investment. To get marketing and and I see that all the time in these small business capital markets I’m in.

    The ones that get the most funding actually have the the most marketing behind them as well. Whether it’s a direct outreach marketing, but it’s, it takes marketing to get funding. So that’s, that is one thing that’s gonna need to happen is a simple, well, you’re right. It, it comes down to capital getting that.

    And from what I see, it’s a, the retirement capital 43 trillion. I mean, a 1 trillion is a thousand billion, and a billion is so much, it’s so crazy how much money that is. If you really think about it, if we only had 1 trillion outta that 43 trillion. What kind of land, how different would our landscape be?

    Investment landscape would be, businesses getting funded. It would be a night and day difference. And. And for me, I, I know I do want to a address and I you kind of brought it up a little bit. The suffering that people are going through, there’s real suffering that’s happening right now because of the economic injustice that’s playing out.

    Sure. And I have compassion for the people that weren’t born into a situation where they can, they have the same opportunities for economic growth. And I have compassion for the people that lived in the past that was even worse than what it was today. Imagine being living in a futile system, and you’re a surf working the land.

    I mean, that was awful. And I have compassion for the people in the future that will suffer because. It’s not gonna change quickly. This is gonna take time. It’s gonna take building, it’s gonna take yes, intentionality to really make it. And it’s gonna take a collaboration of people that don’t necessarily agree with each other.

    And I think that’s also gonna take some forgiveness and looking at a big picture of of modeling successful stories. I think, and that’s why I think it’s important that we work with the Social Enterprise Alliance because these are organizations that do exactly that.

    It collaborates it, it may not be the quick fix that everybody wants, but it’s how we. Come together and use our collective intelligence to solve problems. So we alleviate suffering. So there’ll be just continuing this arc of less suffering. I think we can accelerate it greatly by switching simply from speculative investing into productive investing.

    Just because all that money is literally doing nothing, it’s not. Helping our economy at all. If it is, it’s only helping an elite part of it. And, they say we’ll trickle it down, but that never happens, that’s a myth. It’s more about being a grassroots ground up and creating the conditions for change to happen.

    I think if we want to have. Economic equality and equitable. It starts with that first layer. It starts where everyone has a universal access to capital. Some sort of digital token that we all can use as collateral to start a business, to to buy a first home. We need to have that ’cause that’s how nature works.

    We all need to have that starting point. Not, I’m not arguing for equal outcomes, equal starting points. And I think that first step to getting that is this digital currency, it’s not a currency. It’s a digital store of value where we can build fair distribution currencies on top of it. I know I’m kind of getting lost into a different thing, but I think we need to start where at the very beginning, yes.

    We all need to have access to capital. Why not make it universal? That’s what nature does. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And why not make it purposeful? Like purposeful? Yes. And what a beautiful thing to think about. As you talk, I think of some things I’m optimistic about and that is like moves by for instance, the state of New Mexico to give universal childcare to everyone in the state at no cost and new.

    Newborns get a certain amount of money. Wouldn’t it be great if some of those things were nationalized, that it gives a place for money to sit and grow and people to think about future use of that, future impact of that money, how to, and hopefully along the way. And I’d really like to see this is more economic and like really grassroots down to earth.

    Savings education, starting with kids. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And play with it. Gamify it. But there are so many people who don’t understand the value of saving. Not because it’s their fault, but because the seed’s not been planted and they’re not able to see that. And, and lucky people that even though I was in corporate life and I.

    It burnt me out and there were goods and bads. Having a 401k is a really remarkable thing, and 

    Paul Lovejoy: yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And there, but now I’m looking back at it and saying, but it was all mutual funds and I tried to choose wisely for the planet, but there weren’t that many options. If I could go back and do that now and have a 401k, I would be like right down the road with you and say, okay, how can I put my money into something that’s gonna be productive and do some good for the innovators and the social enterprise companies at the same time?

    And a lot of people do good work and have no vehicle like that for savings, so they have to be more independent. So I think what I’m optimistic about is as you build this, that hopefully it will create a vehicle and a structure for people to think about it that way. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And but also for those businesses to receive.

    Paul Lovejoy: Yeah. To 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: give, but also receive. And I do believe that’s the genius of what you’re bringing up. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Oh, thanks Kim. I appreciate that. I love doing this. I, it’s something that makes me feel good. I am excited to wake up in the day to work on these types of projects and. I think what would help a lot of people is to give yourself some compassion when it comes to just, whatever you’re doing.

    If you like Kim, you know you had mutual funds and you maybe feel a little guilty. You didn’t create the system, this is what you were told, that this is responsible financial practice to have a 401k. Nobody told you that. That’s, that, that’s gonna be in speculation. It’s not gonna be in productive investment.

    And just nobody ever taught these the people about financial literacy, as you were, you’re saying it’s the same thing. So we need to have compassion for that. And if we look and we compare it back to the first people, indigenous folks, well, saving up or, financial literacy, that’s like hunting and gathering skills for modern people.

    And in the indigenous, you had the community. They all taught the next generation how to do that. No one’s teaching this generation because this is all brand new. All of this is all new. An economy, and I mean if you look at it historically and how long humans have survived, it’s a historical aberration, this mainstream kind of finance concept.

    Working with nature that is. That’s normal if you look in a historical context. And yeah, we’ve, we stepped away from that nature. But I think there, you’re right, Kim, there is a there is a real sense of change that’s happening and awakening of like, oh my gosh, we are living against. Na nature’s principles and the pollution and climate change and people get it.

    And so that’s brings me hope that yes, there is this change. And I have compassion. The, the world still does, being from the United States, oh, you’re an American, you’re responsible for this. I give my comp, I give myself compassion when someone says that to me. I’m not responsible for that.

    Okay. I’m doing the best I can. I vote, I do what I can. But I don’t have to feel bad for what America does and because that’s just gonna take up my mental bandwidth when I could be thinking about building infrastructure instead. We don’t want to get sucked into these vortexes of despair or get, oh, what did Trump say?

    That takes away precious mental bandwidth that I would, I don’t think is helpful or healthy for anyone to be going down those rabbit holes. Trying to hold someone accountable. Here’s how you hold someone accountable and validate their legacy by being the change you wish to see in the world.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh my goodness. Yes. Thank you for that. And with that also, what makes you optimistic? 

    Paul Lovejoy: Well, just seeing Kim, I am being in these small business and startup productive markets. I am literally. Looking at the hopes and visions of dreams of other human beings every day, what, how they envision the future and when people are in that kind of creative mindset.

    It’s so hopeful. I see a world where there is no more fossil fuels because of this technology. And it’s very hopeful to be a part of and it makes me also realize how many. Good people are working on this and there isn’t really one person saying, Hey, we need to fix the world.

    It’s everyone contributing, doing their own part. You’re doing your part with this podcast. It’s so cool to see, like when you see like everyone independently deciding. We’re gonna build this. And it’s these moments of clarity that we have where we’re no longer stuck into this kind of conflict and blame and like, oh my gosh, we need to hold these people accountable.

    When we have these moment of clarity where we’re like building, that’s when we come up with these ideas to, to be helpful to create the next product that’s going to replace plastic or what, whatever you ha

    Something that will eventually happen. Eventually there’s gonna be a free energy.

    I don’t think that’s, and if it’s only when, if you see what they’re doing with cold fusion, what I’m seeing, in these investment markets, it’s my I don’t see it as a big shock that we’re, the planet could have free energy 50 years from now. The landscape of reality I don’t think.

    I think we’re so in this moment where it’s so much transition and change happening that it’s really weighing down on people. And I think it’s important for you and I to say there is hope. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I agree. And I’m gonna bring it also back to a statistic that you brought up in the beginning. And for me it, one of ’em comes from Nielsen is.

    It was around 2014 even that they said that two thirds of consumers globally are willing to pay more for products and services when they know a company has good values and sometimes we don’t even need to pay more. Yeah. And with millennials it was 73% and then you brought up marketing and that’s always been the dilemma that I wanna work in and help companies is.

    As a company, your customers are in that two thirds, whether you’re B2B or B2C, they’re out there. How do you make that straight line between two points and it’s marketing and it’s benefit reports and it’s being authentic to your claims and being clear about that? It really helps, and certifications and verifications help as a directory.

    As another search part, but even without that, we’ve gotta get the messages out. So I love what you said about that, and this whole thing is so future forward that it gives me optimism. And I do see places where people really are working toward the end that you’re talking about. There’s the innovators, there’s.

    More and more investors. And the other thing is the nod to the Social Enterprise Alliance, which we are a part of. And what is also exciting about them is the education that SEA puts out. It’s social enterprise alliance.org, but there are coffee chats and webinars and blogs, but also the membership that grows a community that is talking about these things.

    So we also start to create a more circular communication system, hopefully. And if people, they say people need to hear things seven or eight times to really remember and take action now. Let’s keep talking. 

    Paul Lovejoy: Let’s keep talking. I agree. Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I think this is delightful. Is there anything else you’d like to add in addition to please tell people your website.

    And how you Yeah, you 

    Paul Lovejoy: can learn more@stakeholderenterprise.com. Feel free to reach out to me on LinkedIn where I’m very active. Yes, you are. It’s LinkedIn act slash Paul Lovejoy. And those are probably the two best places to. Interact or get to know me better. You can also just email me.

    I’m open. It’s Paul dot lovejoy@stakeholderenterprise.com. You want to, you collaborate on one of these infrastructure projects. Let’s do it. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. And for listeners, everything is also in the show notes and the download. And now we come to our final question, and this is the random question about if you could have dinner with anyone living or deceased up to a table of four.

    It could be one person, two people, or three people. Who would that person or they be and why? 

    Paul Lovejoy: Like the person who I model myself after this may seem odd is Gandhi. Because here you have this slight, tiny little fellow in some robes and he has the ability to get entire empires to listen to him 

    and 

    he was able to do that.

    Not with protesting. He didn’t, he wasn’t a protestor. He was an economic systems thinker. When he saw what was happening with India, he just said, Hey, let’s not buy clothes from the Empire. Let’s make our own clothes. Let’s be self-sufficient. This is the ultimate way of resistance is self-sufficiency.

    And what I, this is why I would love to talk to Gandhi about his self-sufficiency, because that’s what I’m modeling. What I’m trying to do is build an alternative. This is self-sufficiency. So we don’t, right now, we’re dependent on the extractive system for our survival. We’re dependent on that.

    And if we need, we want to escape, we need to be self-sufficient on regenerative economy. So I would love to talk to Gandhi about like, Hey, how can we do some of this also? But at the same time I would wanna know. More about digital currency and and crypto. So I would love to be able to talk to Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous person who wrote the Bitcoin white paper.

    Nobody knows who he is. But I would love to like, who is this guy? Because when you read his white paper, it is very different than what. Bitcoin actually became, so it’s very, oh yeah, it’s very different. So I would love to, to really get to know more Satoshi Nakamoto or whatever his real name, and I’m sure there are others, but I think those are the two people who I would wanna talk to where philosophy meets technology.

    ‘Cause that’s where I feel like I’m, I really love the to be is where philosophy intersects with technology and finance. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I love that and I think that’s very future forward, but yet resonates with the past, and that’s, there’s some wisdom in that. I appreciate this so much. Thank you Paul Lovejoy for being here.

    Everyone. Thanks for listening. Signing off and wishing you well. Thank you. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Paul Lovejoy

    Headshot of Paul Lovejoy.

    Paul Lovejoy is the founder of Stakeholder Enterprise, the nation’s first community investment advisory firm. After navigating the 2008 financial crisis and facing deep personal and professional challenges, Paul began a powerful journey of reflection and renewal. That experience shaped his commitment to building a more ethical and sustainable financial system that truly serves people and planet.

  • Human-First Operations in Business with Maxine Markovitz, MBA Candidate and B Impact Project Lead

    Human-First Operations in Business with Maxine Markovitz, MBA Candidate and B Impact Project Lead

    Maxine Markovitz, an MBA student at Portland State University with extensive experience in operations, change enablement, and project management – joins Kim Allchurch Flick.

    Maxine, who is currently a project lead for a B impact program, shares their journey from labor planning at Amazon to managing projects at A to Z Wineworks, the first B Corps winery in the country.

    They discuss the concept of being ‘human-first’ in business operations, the evolving B Corps certification standards, and the importance of community and innovation in creating a positive social impact.

    Maxine also reflects on the value of inclusive work environments and the role of education in shaping future leaders in social enterprise.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome

    02:00 Maxine’s Journey: From Amazon to B Corps

    04:25 Experiences at Amazon and A to Z Wine Works

    06:15 PSU Program and Net Impact Involvement

    09:50 New B Lab Standards and Fair Wage Discussion

    14:12 The Importance of Community and Innovation

    30:03 Diversity, Inclusion, and Generational Perspectives

    35:40 Optimism and Historical Perspectives

    38:15 Final Thoughts and Farewell

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Welcome everyone. I’m Kim Allchurch Flick. Here today with Maxine Markovitz, an MBA student in Portland State University with a background in operations, change enablement and project management. They’re a project lead for B impact program that helps businesses in the Portland area work toward B Corps certification.

    Maxine’s experience spans industries from labor planning at Amazon to project management at A to Z wine works. That, by the way, is, I believe, the first B Corps winery in the country. They care about human first values, forward approaches, and translate into practical business decisions. So we’re here to talk about what it means to be human first in operations.

    Welcome, Maxine. So happy to have you here. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Thanks Kim. I’m happy to be here. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: So what we have in common, we discovered at the 2025 B Local PDX build conference is that I was in the same program that you are currently in. I was in the PSU certificate program called the Business of Social Enterprise in 2013, and also did a B Corps certification with a winery, and we just had.

    Found that a, it’s so great that even though the program has evolved quite a bit, that it continues. So kudos to PSU and I’m happy to have you here. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, happy to be here. And 2025 now going into 2026, PSUs social impact is still going strong. It’s nice to see, especially in the Portland community.

    That long term community building through PSU for, social impact. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Isn’t that wonderful? Tell us about your journey and particularly the spanning of industry from labor planning at Amazon to what you’re doing now. That’s broad. And what is labor planning and what has been your journey to also looking at life through a social impact lens.

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, so I’m gonna start back March of 2020, which a lot of us remember very fondly. That’s when I moved out to Portland actually. So moved out here at the start of the pandemic and was, looking for work. And at the start of the pandemic, I ended up. Working at a startup company trying to deliver directly from farmers to people in in their homes.

    Farm to table kind of style. And so yeah, just started develop. It was an essential industry at the time. The goal was 70% to the farmer versus, six or 7% at the grocery store. It’s like, okay, I like this operations thing. After that went to UPS and operations again. Then to a to Z wine Works where I was a project specialist.

    It’s the first B Corp that I worked at, and it was just, really cool to see the mission alignment running through, every part. Of the business and just the connection to land there. And then last two years I was at Amazon. So doing labor planning, which, there’s a huge number of humans that are working at those Amazon sites.

    The shift I was on had up to 700 people. So being, human centric, especially at a company like Amazon I realized pretty quickly nothing gets done if you don’t, treat people well and understand. How do you build relationships, with people. So, finished my undergraduate degree in 2023.

    Also at PSU. And now doubling down. I’m a MBA candidate at PSU again and working with net impact at PSU to help get local companies in the Portland area B Corps certified. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s fantastic. And could you dial back a little bit about it? It almost seems polar opposite to be with A to Z, which is fairly large.

    Yeah. It’s a large winery, but not nearly as big as Amazon. And what how did you feel about that dichotomy and how did you observe both and what were some of the good, the bad, and the ugly of those experiences? 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yes, and the beautiful. So two completely very different industry models.

    We’ll start there. Wine is connected to land. It’s connected to people and there’s a lot of art, art and pride in the wine industry. It’s a little bit on the slower moving side compared to say, a company like Amazon where. Rollout changes, every two days. I learned from both and, at Amazon it was challenging to stay, people focused and really feel connected to the work that I was doing with the community.

    But at the same time. The ability to have influence over so many people’s lives. Doing planning for 700 people, even if the role that I play in their lives is just so small, maybe all I do is I wave and I say hi or just smile at them or help them with what they’re going through.

    That was really meaningful for me. I think long term, I liked the fast moving, learning part of it, but I want to be a little bit more connected to, community and making long-term change in a positive way. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, that’s so fantastic. And what has been your experience so far with, currently with the PSU program and net impact?

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. So I have a. I’ve probably told you this, I have a soft spot in my heart for PSU. Yeah. Just since I started classes back in 2020 to finish my undergraduate degree yeah. My experience with PSU, I really like that the school encourages non-traditional students. So just, the academics are very good and the, like the community.

    I’ve gotten to meet people I never would have met before. Working in nonprofits, working in government, working in, dental technology, manufacturing a friend of mine will, and just getting to meet all of these people in the Portland community has been so, like, through PSU has really helped me understand, how important that community is for.

    Not only just your career, but also like your, your value forming as a person. At for net impact. It’s cool for me to see a lot of these, ’cause even at A to Z. It’s a big company, comparatively for a B Corps, right? Cam one of the bigger B Corps. I believe it is.

    Yeah. And so to see these, companies with, 1, 5, 10 employees who want to make, this positive change and to see that process has been really cool for me. Just to see all of the people. Who, you know through what, the business school students can, provide a lot of that the technical work and organization for that.

    But to see that a lot of people in the community have those values, that are so important to like, making our future better. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, that’s so impressive. And it’s so much fun and you’re in the cutting edge because it’s crossing academia with. Being out in the community. And so far, how many B Corps certifications have you done and what has been your impression so far?

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah I joined this year and we’re actually just starting out okay. For 2026. We have three companies we’re working with and our goal in the summer. Finding and networking with folks to find companies to work with. And now January with the start of the winter term kickoff and begin that certification process by by the spring. Yeah. I’ve just been very impressed with people’s commitment to doing the right thing, it’s. It’s been very heartening for me to see, just the, people in the community that want to drive like positive, impact and willingness to work with, pSU been very cool 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: in Indeed. And what I remember telling you when I met you earlier at Build was that I loved the program so much in 2013. I created my company Mighty Appify Consulting because I enjoyed that work so much and have continued doing it, and it’s so great to see students still doing it and seeing you still doing that and you’re on a cutting edge that is going to affect everyone in the B Corps community.

    And that is the transition from version six of the B Lab assessment to the new standards. Which are quite different. And I wanna also reflect back on the Amazon a bit and thinking across the country there’s the pillars are similar but different and deeper in the new standards. And one of, one of the things that they will focus on is fair wage.

    And I was wondering what, how do you view things like that? Have you had any previews of the new standards? And when you think about Amazon and Wage and then working with B Corps and wages and equity and things of that nature what strikes you about moving forward in 2026 and beyond? 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. So first of all, Kim, if you’re okay with it, I, you just recently completed the new E Corp assessment.

    Yes. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: No, I re-certified in version six because it was still in 2025. So I recertified in November actually started it in the beginning of 2025 and it’s been a long process for. A while it is becoming shortened for a variety of reasons. And so my next recertification will be version six.

    But in, in my work, because I am a B certified consultant, I and many people across the country were part of feedback sessions when B Lab was. In the initial phases of building those new standards. So they give us draft versions, we give feedback. So I’ve been aware of it for over two and a half years, and I’d still go to a lot of classes through B Lab to continue cycling through and classes on portions of it, like the equity portion environment portion, things of that nature.

    So I’m aware of it, but have not yet done that for myself. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Gotcha. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: But it’s coming up it for everyone. It’ll be 2026 is the year that if anyone’s doing a certification or recertification in 2026, after I believe January, February, it will probably be the new standards. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. Yeah. Thanks for that background.

    Yeah, so your original question was about the new standards and a living wage. Correct. I so there are, hundreds of millions of people, in this country. And I think just, I know this is, a bit systemic, broadly, I don’t think we’re doing a very good job of looking after those people to provide that living wage and provide people with, the stability they need to.

    Find kind of that comfort and community in their life once you have those kind of basic needs met. Some of the good of Amazon before I talk about, some of the challenges, the good is, to find an employer that gives you good benefits gives you time time off and the ability to pay for school, but.

    On the other hand, we’re working without these, roles that are really anchoring our, people to community and providing like long-term ability to develop, like skills in the workforce that, help people grow and provide for their families, I think 

    From that standpoint.

    It’s really important if you want to be an equitable, company forget AI and forget, all this technology. You’re responsible for the people who you know, work with you and work for you or are in your community. And, by providing that wage. And it’s not just the wage, it’s the ability to grow, right.

    People want skills. And if you can provide them with skills and the future and the way to, take care of their families and, their education and their bodies, that’s, something I think we need to be much more focused on as like a community. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s beautifully stated. And how are you seeing that play out as you’re out and about in the community?

    Maxine Markovitz: You know, I see, a lot of people are calling this a khap economy. 

    And, I see people on the extreme end of, very high income doing really well, and I see people falling below that part of the k kind of getting squeezed in a way that it’s it’s hard to see where a lot of folks doing, necessary jobs or trade jobs.

    We don’t have a lot of the things like, union representation that we need to protect, workers and that mobility of just, people to get a good job in their community, stay in their community and grow. I don’t really see that being prioritized because people are prioritizing, technology and advancement without understanding that.

    If you don’t focus on the people in the community, the technology may sustain us for a while, but it doesn’t look after like the actual responsibility of being a person in a position of power who should look after, the people, the responsible for. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That’s profound and I think important. And looking forward, how do you also view.

    As a, an MBA candidate and academia. The Portland State, granted, I think has very mission-driven instructors as well and professors, but MBAs often focus on what makes business strong, profitable pivots, exits, things of that nature. And more. And yet the social enterprise portion that you’re also in with net impact.

    And do you see, where do you see those aligning and where do you see them doing? What you said before is that split where profit is the most important and the purpose and planet part may not be as strong if they’re at all. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. That’s a good question. And. We’re living in a system where the rules favor the accumulation of wealth, right?

    So the adage, no money, no mission, right? In the B Corp space, which is you have to make a profit and build resiliency to keep your business, stable and protect the people that you work for. Then on the other extreme is, this is not my responsibility. Somebody else will take care of this problem.

    My responsibility is to my shareholders. And I try to see a lot of the nuance in that where, you, unfortunately, the system is set up in a way where businesses have to run a certain way to make. Money and be survive, no matter how mission aligned, if you can’t fund the business, it won’t operate.

    But somewhere in there is that room to realize I’m responsible for my impact in the business environment. And my impact in the community. And that kind of critical thinking to realize that, the decisions we make. Impact what happens, especially for people, right?

    There’s an enormous amount of privilege to go to an MBA program, right? That’s a master’s degree. It’s a very highly skilled, set of knowledge that’s organized, primarily to, to run due strategy and, processes for businesses. How do you take that? One of the things I think about is how do I take that and say, I also need to be able to provide for myself, and I’m responsible for, the privilege that I have to get this education, and what I can do with the cap, the social capital that I get from my, knowledge and my working experience, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: what to do with the social capital.

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: How do you feel about that looking at your future? 

    Maxine Markovitz: It is honestly a hard question. So it’s a newer question. I’m grappling with, in the last few years I didn’t have a college degree until I turned 26. So I finished college one class at a time, working, full-time.

    And so this is now a newer. Problem. I wouldn’t say a problem, maybe. Maybe an opportunity to be, positive a newer opportunity for me to think, okay, I’m in this position now where I’m very soon going to have this, degree where I can make a lot of change. And it’s something honestly I’m still thinking about as I decide what role I want next for.

    Working, where I want to contribute in my community. So I don’t think I have a good answer as much as it’s something that, I’m thinking about now that I know is important and it’s, it takes a lot of time to really understand your place in that. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. Do you think through time with your experience now with Net impact and your experience with Amazon, that you have an intuitive sense of what a company’s values are?

    Mission and whether you would want to be with a company or create your own? 

    Maxine Markovitz: I think I’d like to be with a company. Working for a company. Just from a personal standpoint, the stability is really helpful, at least for right now, while, building my, life and really trying to figure out my place in that.

    And I think every, role that I’ve had has, taught me a little bit more about where I want to be. So I don’t think I’ve ever gotten it. Right. But I think I learned a little bit from, each one and my, my question now is how do I take the things that I like and that I’m, good at?

    I’m a strong, analytical thinker. I like to solve, big problems and how do I find companies that, you know. Because I, I don’t know if there’s any way to perfectly, exist with the way our world is set up, but find a company. I can say, look, I can sleep well at night knowing what I’m doing.

    I feel like the thing that we’re producing or what we’re doing or how we’re treating people is meaningful and, go from there. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. I think what always drives me and is stuck with me for a few years since I read it, is Nielsen reports, and a couple of statistics stand out.

    One, I believe it’s from 2014, was basically that two thirds of consumers globally are willing to pay more for products and services when they know a company has good values. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And then another study with millennials said that same question was about 73%. So the consumer base B2B and B2C. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Large part is looking, and my question has always been, okay, companies, how are they going to find you and what are the ways?

    And so it seems as though there’s this broad spectrum of things that can be true and opposing and connected all at once. And there are some companies that. Say things, make claims, but aren’t doing good things for the world. There’s some that are trying to get by and do the very best they can, but there are obstacles and sometimes it’s just impossibly hard to pay a lot of people more than the living wage if the revenue isn’t great.

    Yeah, and there’s some things like tariffs that are coming in that have been reality bites in 2025. For companies, even though their mission and values are very strong. And then on the other end of that spectrum, there are groups of innovators that are innovating for making the world a better place.

    And it can be through medicine, manufacturing, agriculture. There’s movements for land healing and regeneration. There’s movements for. Better technology for energy. I read a book called, here Comes The Sun by Bill McKibbon, talking about how China is leapfrogging everyone in terms of solar. And even though yes, they’re polluted and they have a history and they have a coal history, they’re rapid acceleration forward thinking, it’s solar, that they wanna put solar panels everywhere and make them so accessible that people will be able to.

    Put solar panels on a railing of a deck and it’ll help make coffee. The innovation part is, seems like it’s on the other side, and granted there can be nefarious innovations as well, but people doing innovations as a way to solve a problem and heal the world seems, gives optimism. Me at least. And I’m wondering what are you seeing, because you’re still in this cross hairs of good cross hairs of academia and the world, and you’ve also been in your past around policy makers.

    How does it look for you with those things in mind? 

    Maxine Markovitz: That’s a good question and I appreciate you bringing up that people will pay more. It’s helpful as a reminder, people want. A way to, make positive change or know what they’re doing, is bringing positive change.

    And no I’m pausing for a second, but I’m trying to, it’s, I see we’re on this, on the edge of a lot of changes in our 

    Yeah. 

    In, in the US right. And globally like the acceleration of. Climate change, but also the acceleration of a lot of you know what? Energy is the cheapest energy now it’s solar, wind is cheaper.

    Now we have all of these, on the innovation side, it’s finding, that mission or the focus of, maybe you take just a little bit less on the profit side just a little bit less, maybe that’s not the only thing we focus on, and we broaden that scope out to make sure that, what we’re doing has the positive impact for, people and communities. There’s a, give you an example. There’s a community solar project in the Cully neighborhood. Shout out to Verde. They’re a great company. I have a friend who works there. And they’re making solar accessible to everybody in the community. You all pool in so you don’t have to lower income community.

    Everybody gets access to solar and that’s. Innovation and how are we, getting resources to people. But I think, we have the innovation side figured out. 

    Clearly that’s, the US has been on the forefront of innovation for a long time, but I think one of the ways that this, the country is really lacking is the long-term planning for, human.

    Impact. 

    And I do see innovation happening in a positive way, but not in the kind of cohesive, connected way that I think, we have the potential to really do. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, I hope listeners are really pondering that statement, because therein lies something that’s truly important. And I do think there are innovators who are trying on that piece as well.

    And I’ll reference Rebecca Dre, who I think is just a genius visionary who created a nonprofit called Purchasing With Purpose to create a network and of networks, a web of mission-driven companies that can seek and work with each other, including things that we often don’t think about in the B Corps world, but should be players as well as logistics.

    Shipping companies, where are we gonna get our packaging? All of these areas. And in each of those, it is intriguing to see innovations popping up and it gives me some optimism. Like one of our local companies, chocolates spelled with a dash e has found packaging that is zero plastic. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, exactly.

    Where did they find 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: it? They’re working with innovators and. 10, 15 years ago, some of those didn’t exist. So we, people had to work with what they had and as the innovations pop up and it gives us more choice, that’s more to be supported. So I really, really appreciate the innovations to come that aren’t here yet, but also those that are and embracing them, and sometimes it becomes a cost barrier.

    Sometimes, but sometimes perhaps not. And I love your way of framing everything because it’s so pragmatic. You also mentioned that you would like to work with an established company, and you strike me as somebody who’s also very caring and innovative. And a friend of mine wrote a book, Louis Gump wrote the Insight Innovator.

    And it’s a beautiful way of thinking about entrepreneurship, how to be within a company, but also be mission-driven social enterprise within what do you think about that? 

    Maxine Markovitz: I think everywhere that we go, we make change everywhere. So every company we’re in, every role we’re in, we’re making change with just with the people that we, you know.

    Talk, talk to, and what we do in our work, I am a very, you’re absolutely right, I’m a very by nature very practical, pragmatic person. And I try to say, okay, even if I’m only, interacting with, two coworkers in this organization, how do we make this a little bit more equitable from this, level?

    And it’s, a lot of these like big, systematic changes for organizations can start with just little, little changes with, how people relate to each other and how seriously they take, their responsibility in their, in either, if you’re in one little part of an org, you can kind of spread out or almost trickle out that.

    Positivity or that community focus. So I’m gonna, I’m gonna take you read that book. I’ll let you know. I’m very excited on that. Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And what also do you think about and this is dabbling on a hot topic from 2025. Yeah. And three, three little letters that have been pretty much banished, but in, in terms of really creating.

    Community within workplaces that is open to everyone. And that in across spectrums that words inclusion might be one of them. And I’m purposely dancing across the words because the people that do the work are also saying it. It was never about three letters. It’s about what is the humanity. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah.

    Of 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: being in a workplace and making a living and providing, and contributing. So I was wondering what are you seeing, what discussions are in academia and what are you seeing out in the world around people being able to bring their whole selves to a workplace and be able to contribute in the workplace also being accepting?

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, that’s a good question. If everybody were like me, the world would be a bad place. If everybody were the same, the world would be a bad place. I think, having a lot of different kinds of people in the world with different kinds of, ways of looking at things. I mean, that’s a tremend. Even if you just wanna look at it from like a business standpoint, ignoring the fact that, these people are your neighbors and people, just you have a human right to care about, as another sentient being on this planet.

    But even from a business perspective, diversity makes things so much better. You get different types of ideas, you get new ways of thinking, you get new ways of. Problem solving. And if we come to viewing, prosperity or community as something that’s fixed, I think that’s where you start to lose.

    It’s not, a fixed pie. When somebody, when my neighbor does better, I do better. Right. When I bring somebody else into an organization who comes from a different background, I have a better. I have a better time. I get to learn and, it’s just so crazy to me how, terrified we’ve become of people who are, different in the, one of the things I really like about the Portland State community particularly in the MBA program is you get a lot of people who are coming from different. Backgrounds. And that for me makes the program so much more rich and so much more interesting than just, you lose a lot of the Yeah.

    Texture of life when everybody just is the same. And I know there’s a huge engine we could go off on, on a lot of, what’s going on. Politically right now, but just to keep it, try to I try as hard as I can to be positive. You’re not losing anything by, supporting somebody else.

    Your life doesn’t get any worse if somebody else’s gets better, just we can just, we can all be nice. It helps. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Absolutely. Oh, and I remember when I took the certificate in 2013, I was also in what doesn’t exist anymore, but it was Portland State’s Masters of International Management. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And that was created to be more than 50% students from overseas.

    And it was incredible. But the other dynamic that was there was because I’d had a corporate career and had been laid off and decided I’d like to carve out something new. The other thing is I was an outlier because there was only maybe three of us who were over like 35. And yeah, so it, so there’s also this thing about diversity of thought, generational diversity and inclusion across all these different spectrums and with these people from different countries.

    And it, to me, that was a highlight as well, being in a room. Such an array of backgrounds. It’s just incredible. And then to add the social enterprise certificate on top of that, I really am grateful to PSU for and I’m like a lot of people that have been in corporate careers and have been laid off.

    It’s like, what do you do next? A lot of people start to create their own. Company, they still have something to give them and wanna work with. And I found PSU was really supportive of that. 

    And I also wanna give you the appreciation that one of the things I noticed when we met is you gave me a lot of grace as well about generational diversity and a feeling that.

    My ideas are welcome. Your ideas are welcome. And that also is something I feel that we can really learn from ancestry, from experience, from innovators, from new thoughts, from a variety of things that swirl into this pool of how can we communicate together and create community and do better and do good things 

    Maxine Markovitz: well, that’s, and you 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: that.

    Maxine Markovitz: Thank you, Kim. I appreciate that and I feel the same to you. I appreciate you, talking to me and, listening to my perspective. Humans are meant to be in community, right? Yes. We’re meant to live multi-generationally. We’re meant to think, generations past to generations future, and, no.

    One of us is, an island. Don’t blame the person before you, talk to them. Don’t blame the person after you, talk to them. And I think it’s, it’s great a to be one of those voices, like you were saying when you were in the program, of one of the older students to, you, we all have different perspectives and things that make us, valuable.

    To realize that and to find people that are, interested in, exploring that with us is, is beautiful. Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you. Thank you so much. So what gives you optimism? 

    Maxine Markovitz: What gives me optimism? I think what gives me optimism is knowing that. What people are capable of when we really come together to make things better.

    In my undergrad, I was a history major, so we’re, I’m looking all the way, all the way back, right? 

    And 

    you see these periods where things get bad, and then things get good, and then things get bad. And then they get good and, we come together and we fall apart, and we come together and we fall apart.

    But realizing when, you know what? We’re capable of in, community. I look back at, for example, like post world Wari when income inequality was at its lowest in the country and people were, buying houses and the economy was growing and, there’s a lot of problems Right.

    In that time. But just looking at that kind of arc of history. And, seeing what we can do, and how even in a decade, we can say, oh, well that was pretty crazy. I’m not sure. I’m not sure why we did all this. And 

    Really make like positive change come together, realize that we’re all part of this, human equation and that.

    The people, we have everything we need. We just need to come together. There’s enough good people trying to do the right thing, and sooner or later, I’m hoping we’ll get it back on track. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh I appreciate that and I am thinking we need a second podcast with you to talk about the importance of history because Yeah I find.

    I’ve kind of always been this way, but more recently because there’s more authors writing incredible books that are like novels, but they’re true history and how the importance of history because it helps us anticipate what might be happening. And I see that resonating now. So we’ll have to come back and talk about that because that’s a big topic, but Absolutely.

    You know, reading a book about what happened in Teddy Roosevelt’s time and they’re using the same words that are being used now. It’s like this is a mirrored 130 years later. We need to know to anticipate, to be able to respond. So let’s bookmark that for a future one, because sounds like do history sounds like a plan.

    Think history matters. Indeed. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, absolutely. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: How can people get ahold of you? And this will also be in the show notes, but we want people to know you’re out there, business owners, and so that you can find, help, find your way in the future. Yeah. How can we get ahold of you if you’d like? 

    Maxine Markovitz: Thanks, Kim. I appreciate that.

    Yeah. You can connect with me on uh, LinkedIn. My name is Maxine Markovitz.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Fantastic. Is there anything else you’d like to add before the final question? 

    Maxine Markovitz: I just wanna say, thanks Kim. I appreciate you taking the time to do this.

    I think now now more than ever, we need, people like you doing this kind of work. Appreciate you taking the time and having a good time, and thank you. Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Thank you as a voice of the future as well, because you’re on the cutting edge of the education part and you have some deep experience, so I think the future is bright.

    The next question, final one, is if you could have dinner with anyone living or dead up to a table of four that includes you, who would they be? 

    Maxine Markovitz: I think number one I would pick Octavia Butler. Octavia Butler is one of, Kim. Do you know Octavia Butler? 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I do, yes. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, so Octavia Butler is my number one.

    Not personally, but I know. But for the audience, if you don’t know please, I highly recommend read Octavia Butler’s work, Afro futurism. And her work as one of these seminal black sci-fi authors talking not just about our connection to the past, but our relationship to the future, across continents, across cultures.

    Just such a beautiful and very interesting mind. My second choice is Judith Butler. One of the philosophers behind post-structural feminism created a lot of the discourse that we have now on identity formation and gender differences. As a non-binary person really was one of the people that helped form a lot of my thinking.

    On my identity number three is a little bit of a wild card. It’s gonna be, I’d say David Bowie, just such, just so cool. I don’t know if I have, a deep seated reason for that one, but just, oh my gosh, the, the music such a beautiful, human and I would just love to hear.

    What he has to say. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, what a beautiful ending. I’m gonna ponder that. I wrote them down, 

    Maxine Markovitz: but 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: yes. David Bowie, someone whose artistry lives on. 

    Maxine Markovitz: Yeah, well 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: said. 

    Maxine, thank you so much. I’m so appreciative. 

    Maxine Markovitz: thank you, Kim. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Maxine Markovitz

    Maxine Markovitz is sitting in a chair and smiling. They wear a peach suit coat, blue bow tie, and wide framed black glasses.

    Maxine Markovitz is an MBA student at Portland State University with a background in operations, change enablement, and project management. They are a project lead for a B Impact program that helps businesses in the Portland area work toward B Corp certification. Maxine’s experience spans industries from labor planning at Amazon to project management at A to Z Wineworks. They care about how human-first, values-forward approaches translate into practical business decisions.

  • Inspiring Social Change through Video Production with Erik Croswell of Bridge City Media

    Inspiring Social Change through Video Production with Erik Croswell of Bridge City Media

    Erik Croswell, a video producer and content strategist from Bridge City Media, joins Kim Allchurch Flick on the ‘Mighty Measure’ podcast.

    This episode dives into Erik’s journey of founding Bridge City Media, his passion for working with social enterprises, and the significant shift towards value-driven work.

    Erik shares insights about the importance of balancing business acumen with social impact, emphasizing community, and the role of AI in the industry.

    The discussion also touches on memorable projects and the unique qualities of Portland’s business culture.

    Listen Now

    Time Stamps

    00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome

    00:45 Erik’s Journey with Bridge City Media

    02:46 Focus on Social Enterprises

    04:43 Impact of Certifications and Values

    09:01 Balancing Profit and Purpose

    14:30 Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategies

    23:53 Challenges and Opportunities in Different Markets

    25:33 Comparing Portland to Other Cities

    26:38 B2B vs B2C in Video Production

    27:44 The Role of AI in Business

    33:04 Challenges in Video Production

    37:54 Optimism and Community Support

    40:11 Dream Projects and Final Thoughts

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Hello everyone. Happy January and happy 2026. This is Kim Allchurch flick. And here with me today is Erik Croswell of Bridge City Media. Erik is a video producer and content strategist that runs Bridge City Media. A decade into his small business. His company has worked with hundreds of companies on creating promotional and informative videos with a specialized focus on social enterprises.

    As a B Corps, he wishes to use the company to inspire positive change in the world. Erik, welcome. How are you? 

    Erik Croswell: Doing well. Glad to be here, Kim. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Fantastic. It’s great to have you here. So what is, what has led you. So this place in time and Bridge City Media, what’s your story? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. I started Bridge City Media in 2016 with a friend of mine.

    At the time we just didn’t quite know what we were doing. It was just a side hustle. We were both working at the same company and we’ve realized that we had complimenting, skill sets for video as well as marketing. And so we’re like, Hey, let’s start a little business on the side. And in that process we did a lot of wedding videos and music videos and web design and like all, all over the place, just anything that we would come our way, we’d just say yes to.

    But over time we found that it was great to have more of a niche in working with businesses. For producing video content and when he chose not to move forward with coming into the business full time. And I did that’s what I continued to focus on. Since then we’ve produced hundreds of. Projects with different businesses.

    Probably a few thousand videos at this point. And it’s ranged from explainer content, social media, videos, commercials documentaries a pretty wide array of things. And it’s been a really rewarding experience. It’s been amazing to connect with the city of Portland in this way as well as be able to travel around the US to other places to create video content as well.

    And it’s been a nice blend of some of my own upbringing in working in marketing and that was my central focus in school as well as combining it with just being a passionate filmmaker. And growing up making short films with friends. So it feels like a good professional blend of flexing those creative muscles.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That sounds fantastic. And what is it about the social enterprise piece? 

    Erik Croswell: How is that 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: expressed? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, actually I think that you introduced me to that world a very long time ago. We were looking for opportunities for some case studies and we wanted to help some businesses out with, like running an ad campaign.

    And so that’s how you and I originally met through a Facebook group. I would say maybe around seven or eight years ago at this point, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: yes. 

    Erik Croswell: And. Yeah, we got connected with Benefit Corporations for Good. I had already been a bit a part of Conscious Capitalism. I just happened to read that book by John Mackey from whole Foods and got connected with a local chapter of that here.

    And then meeting you, you connected me with Benefit Corporations for Good and then got introduced to the B Corp movement. I think it was just. Those values were already there, and it was awesome to get linked up to a few different groups that were trying to practice that. I didn’t really want to run a business just to make a lot of money.

    I wanted to run a business to do what I wanted to try and live. And support myself by being an artist. And so money was never necessarily the draw for me, and I’ve always had a deep care for the planet, environmentalism social justice for other people, and plants and animals as well. And it’s been really cool to know that there’s a really thriving community of businesses in the Portland area that try to focus their central point of enacting certain types of social change as opposed to just pursuing consistent profit.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah it’s interesting and I remember first meeting you and being so impressed and you are have a company that is also certified in both Benefit Corporations for Good and B Corp. And maybe can tell us a little bit more about, but I’m also interested in, as you’ve been in B Corp, benefit Corporations Benefit Company community.

    How do you see clients and what they do in the world and has your lens about the general community at large shifted at all? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. I think that it goes both ways in the sense of like, when I meet companies that have been certified and when they meet us, there’s this. There’s this extra recognition of, oh, you’re taking your company seriously.

    If we work together, maybe you’ll take my company seriously. And so I think that that’s nice from just generally a marketing lens for people who are considering going through these types of certification processes. But I know for myself, when I meet a company that has taken those steps to be certified, it tells me that, they’re more connected with what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. They’re having. Consistent challenging conversations. They’re trying to continue to get better. And I think because of all of those steps, they’re just naturally also just gonna be more function like high functioning, effective companies in the business that they do because they’re not necessarily running on autopilot.

    They’re really paying attention to the work that they’re doing and the impact that they’re making. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And do you find that they’re, as they’re themselves getting deeper into a B Corps community, or even if not B Corps, social enterprise values, thinking, does their storytelling change 

    Erik Croswell: and what they 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: ask you to do for them?

    ’cause they have product or service, they’re B2B or B2C, but in telling the story. Do they want to resonate their values as well? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, I definitely find that companies that are in the nonprofit space or B Corp social enterprise type space they, we more frequently get asks for producing content that showcases their company culture.

    They really like to show that off and they’ll typically use that as a means for recruiting. And that’s something that I pretty rarely ever see outside of those spaces. I we work with all types of companies. We have a little bit more of a focus in working with social enterprise, but but yeah, we pretty much never get asked to say Hey can you highlight our team culture if they’re not within that realm?

    So they really want to use that to push. Like recruitment efforts. But on top of that, you can tell they’re just really proud of it and they know that it helps them stand out from their competition and they really want to flaunt it and show it off because it’s something they worked really hard on.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And as a creative, how does that make you feel when you’re asked to create content with them and for them that expresses that? 

    Erik Croswell: Oh, great. I love working with, I love working with any company that genuinely enjoys what they’re doing and they care about what they’re doing and they believe that the impact that their company has is a good one.

    And I especially love working with companies where you can tell that everyone works there genuinely likes their jobs. There’s a lot of really large companies that we’ve worked for. That I’ve been surprised that meet people all across like different levels within the company and like everyone is just super happy.

    And then really small companies of course, so you’ll find that as well. So I think there’s something really cool about culture that isn’t inherently something that is diminished as a company grows. I think that. Companies of any size can take appropriate steps to ensure that everyone on their team feels connected and valued, and that people are able to live good lives by spending their time working at a company.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: That sounds so awesome. And your company’s growing. 

    How is it working in your recruiting to, to be Yeah. B Corps and Vision, vision and mission driven? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, definitely. I think it, helps build a lot of trust. I think that when you run a small company, you have to essentially ask people to compromise and say, Hey we’re small.

    But if we all wear like a few different hats. For a while, then we’re going to be able to achieve this. And when we achieve this, we’re all gonna be able to get paid more. And then we will add these benefits. And, and you have to ask people to be a little bit patient as you build that process along.

    And it requires a lot of transparency. And I think that being. Certified showcases that were a little bit more serious in that level of transparency. And the promise that we’re making isn’t just to this small group of people that are internal employees, but also to the greater community to say Hey, like everyone, pay attention to us.

    We’re we’re trying to do. The right thing here, and we welcome you to audit us and showing that you’re taking those steps to your employees means that like they’re gonna be so much more likely to trust that you actually do have their best intentions in mind. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And the other thing I know about you and full disclosures to the listeners Erik is on my company’s advisory board, and that you have this very strong north about good business acumen as well for business health.

    Like running a business so it is profitable knowing where the expenses are going. Yeah. Knowing how to read the p and l knowing. When to make a pivot or not. And you shared a lot of words of wisdom about that. And social enterprise and business fundamentals kinda need to go hand in hand because there’s people, planet, and purpose.

    But profit being healthy is a good thing to do for society and also for companies that do have employees. They wanna keep those employees and keep them happy. That’s fundamental. Yeah. And you’re a good voice for that. I was wondering as you look at the community, you’re working in, the community in general and the community of clients, how are you seeing that balance, like how can companies be fiscally healthy and also live those values, express them, and and be able to still grow and move forward?

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, I think that it’s so vital that those two things go hand in hand. I think I see a lot in the, especially the small business communities like very small business, they go into social enterprise spaces with a lot of big ideas of wanting to create great change in the world, but they lead a little too forward with that, and they don’t actually consider profit in a thoughtful way, and then they end up burning out.

    And not really being able to survive past a year or two, and then they don’t actually are able to achieve the change that they wanted to see. So the profit aspect of it is vital in the sense of it gives you the consistent energy to continue to show up for your community and continue to create the change that you want.

    Because without that it’s pretty much just wishful and it’s branding that doesn’t actually lead to impact. So I think it’s very important that people continue to tie those two things together. And then on the flip side, if you’re just pursuing profit it’s really difficult to even pull off, frankly, because unless you’re really skilled liar and you are the boss of a company, like people are going to catch wind that you don’t actually have any care.

    For their wellbeing or the community’s wellbeing and they’re not really gonna want to get behind you and support you unless it’s built up as a nefarious type of company that is designed to make a lot of money over a couple of years and then end, which there are pretty plenty of those. But yeah, I think any business that wants to stick around for a while, you really need to find that balance between.

    Consistent profit consistent growth, as well as continuing to ask yourself like, why are you doing any of this? And who are you helping? And like, why do you feel good about this? And how can you feel better about this? How can you help more? How can you make more money? How can you help more?

    How can you make more money? And then just going on that back and forth is. The businesses that we work with that I see are really successful are just constantly auditing that and constantly asking those questions. Yeah. And changing them year to year. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And that’s where some of the rigor comes with the certifications, right?

    That they’re they’re rigorous on a either annual or every three year basis, but writing a benefit report once a year, all those things that can be, yeah. Difficult for some, just to have the time to be able to monitor all of that, to encapsulate it in a report, but also gratifying and that it’s a look back, it’s a look forward and it’s a proof point and it’s documenting progress with the receipts.

    Yeah. That can be pretty amazing. And I think one of the things that pops into my mind talking to you is a statistic that. I loosely quote frequently, but it comes from Nielsen, and I think it was around 2014 when they published that two thirds of consumers globally are willing to pay more for products and services when they know a company has good values.

    And then they studied millennials only and it was 73%. So my question has always been they’re looking, how are they finding, and that’s where a company like yours comes in. Helping a company really express their values as well as their product and service the marketing to feed into a plan that either helps their SEO or helps their expression somehow.

    And that’s one of the things I think is the big tension, frustration between truly values driven companies and their people are in those two thirds and that 73%. How, where’s the connection? How do you get that line between two points? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And have you seen that and have you seen, what, when you do the videos and the marketing with a company that wants to express that years since, have you seen that it’s made a difference?

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, it’s it depends on where a video like that lands in the decision making process of the consumer. Sure. So sure. I think there’s rosy thinking that people are going to make a big change in how they’re going to buy something based purely on some sort of value, but the likelihood is not, most of the time they’re usually looking for a specific service that can meet a specific demand and within a specific price point.

    Those are the primary reasons that people are gonna make a decision on something. But depending on, especially for like larger purchase decisions and. Whether it’s like a larger type of product or especially in the B2B service world you’re gonna take a lot more steps for considering how you want to move forward with something.

    And so I think that the type of content when you’re really pushing showcasing like what you’re doing as a company for the planet or your community or like how you’re treating your workers, I think those are the types of pieces of content that really tip the scale, but it’s gonna be a little bit later into the consumer’s decision making process.

    Like people aren’t gonna go out and buy a car because a local car dealership one a, how like I, an award on how they treat their employees. They’re gonna go buy a car ’cause they need a car and they want to make sure that they can buy something within their budget range. But then if they’re looking at like four different companies and everyone looks like they’re gonna meet their demand, it’s gonna be within their budget, then they’re probably gonna make decisions.

    Additionally, on top of that. On some values that they might see themselves in and they might align with. And everyone loves people and they want to make sure that they’re supporting something that treats people well. And yeah. And then some people have like different like niches of how they.

    End up promoting some of that. You’ll have like companies, they’ll say that oh, we have some sort of specialized employment work with veterans or some sort of like specialized employment work of making sure we have equitable opportunities for bipoc employees within our company.

    And I think that those are the types of things that tip the scale of someone moving forward with one versus another. And it’s really important to be careful about where you place that content. Because I think that if you place it a little too on in the process as like a first introduction to a company, it feels disingenuous and it can actually sometimes have the opposite effect of what people think it will.

    It’ll make people. A little turned off in the sense of, okay, this company is like using this as some sort of like cheap marketing ploy as opposed to maybe it’s on a secondary page in a website, or maybe it is something that was shared in an email follow up after, like an initial meeting with someone.

    We try to be really careful with the strategy with companies in that way. As well. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And I think that’s a very valuable statement, and I’m glad you brought it up. And for listeners knowing that as well as businesses, we also have to be true to our product and service. And it’s not about us, it’s about who the client is, who the stakeholders are, who the potential partners are, and trying to reach that balance.

    And every once in a while a customer, Marie, like I said, just. Feels disingenuous and they have choices. And on the flip side, sometimes a company has a choice to fire a client or not hire a client in the first place. So in between all of that is do a good job, present well, do a good job, have a good product or service that they need, meet all that along the way.

    And isn’t it wonderful that the company treats their employees well? Donates. Some here and there and how to express that. I always find that there’s no hard and set rules about that because every sector is different. Like consumer goods are way different than service providers in a lot of ways how the journey of the customer is very different, but somewhere along the way it helps to know, because Nielsen says two thirds of consumers, and I don’t even know if they’re willing to pay more, is the most important thing, but they’re looking.

    For the good values. And maybe to your point, it’s not first all the time, it’s they’re looking for a product and if they have two choices and one of those companies has good values, that’s the way they’ll lean. And that hopefully creates a ripple effect so that more and more the companies that are getting their supplies are also looking at values-based companies.

    And the companies that are using logistics are doing that. And we’re in this whole purchasing with purpose movement now, which is. Making me really optimistic that people are starting to recognize that as a decision point among all the others that can help frame how they make decisions. How and how do you see that?

    Have you heard of the purchasing with Purpose and people in Planet First? 

    Erik Croswell: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Oh, 

    Are the, are those, are you talking about like organizations? Or just the people And Planet First is a verification and Purchasing 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: with purpose is the organization. So Purchasing with Purpose was created.

    It’s it, this is all fairly recent. If you consider that B Corps is 20 years old, BCFG benefit Corporations for Good is seven going on. Eight people in Planet First and purchasing with Purpose are in the like two to three 

    Years. So these are new things. And Purchasing with Purpose is a nonprofit that wants to gather members to see how literally purchasing is more than one step.

    Looking all the way to who’s the supplier, who’s the packager, who’s the, what’s the logistics? And if it’s service providing, there’s still, it’s a network and creating a network of purpose driven. Communities and those along the way verify with the people in planet first. That creates more recognition.

    And also make sure that there is that third party standard that says, yes, we’re trying to make sure that nobody’s greenwashing, that their claims are true, that they’ve proven that they’re documenting. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Which helps people make decisions. So it’s encouraging. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. Yeah, definitely.

    I think, I think that, I think there’s a lot of consumer fatigue in the sense of not trusting what certain certifications might mean. I know that like when I talk to people who are in the small and the medium business space that live in Portland, Oregon, and you ask them what a B Corp is, they’re gonna be like, oh yeah.

    Like maybe they can give you a destination, or at the very least, they’re gonna. Say they’ve heard of it. Most people who are outside of that just don’t seem to know still even after 20 years. And I think that like it’s. When you go to the store and you see the organic and the free range and the cage free and the, like all these like different stamps. I think that now people have gotten this idea that a lot of those stamps are just marketing and not necessarily some sort of genuine showcase of what something, like if it’s going to match the values that they’re hoping that it’s aligned with.

    So I think that there’s an important aspect of education that’s still needed from the community to make sure people like, understand what a B Corp stand means, what what A-B-C-F-G certification is along with consumers taking the steps to make those decisions 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: indeed. 

    Erik Croswell: Make 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: and indeed.

    And you are here in Portland, but you also mentioned you travel for work elsewhere. And I do think Portland is in somewhat of a bubble when it comes to social enterprise and discussions, and yet there’s still a lot of people that I meet run into who say, what’s a B Corps and it’s an opportunity it’s a chance to have a chat with them about that.

    But when you’re working outside of Portland what differences do you see and. Yeah. What kind of companies are you working with? 

    Erik Croswell: Oh, yeah, no significant difference. I really think that the Portland market is so different than other parts of the us. We really value small business in such a cool way and we really value people working locally.

    You’ll see that in a lot of like big cities here, but like the energy is so. Defined in Portland in a pretty significant way. I think a great example is that we kicked out our target and our Walmart. Like it’s very rare that like businesses like that have such a hard time existing in a larger metropolitan area.

    But when we’ve worked outside of Portland, if we mentioned B Corp, people have not heard of it. You can tell that they really don’t care about avoiding making purchases from a larger chain. That they don’t really take as much of a time to consider aspects of their supply chain other than efficiency and cost.

    I think that’s something that is really, really cool about Portland is like our culture here promotes. So much more of wanting to be consistently acting within these values and exploring that. And yeah, I mean you can say that for a few cities in like California and Seattle too. I don’t see Portland’s like severely different than those.

    But when we work outside of the area, it would. Typically be for some sort of con company that’s connected to Oregon in some way, but they have some sort of factory that’s like out in Texas or out in like Idaho or Wyoming, something like that. And so like we might travel to a space to get some, like additional B roll or do interviews with certain executives that are spread out.

    As we work on a larger project. But yeah I think that there’s this idea that all cities are the same. Everyone has their craft beer and their nice coffee and like some cool skyscraper that you can go to the top of and look at the city. But Portland really is culturally quite different and I think that.

    You, I’ve noticed a significant difference in the B2B space. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Interesting. And do you work more with B2B or do you work with B2C as well? 

    Erik Croswell: Typically B2B. It’s pretty rare. Usually B2C is gonna be a little bit. Staggered in the sense that we might be working with a larger agency that is hiring us as a video production solution for a larger product.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Okay. 

    Erik Croswell: So we’re not typically like just producing content that is. Is like directly gonna be shown to consumers. It’s more so like video that is part of some greater ad campaign. That is like working with a much larger full service digital marketing agency. But for B2B, it’s like a law firm or a, like a local healthcare system they’re gonna be great to just reach out to us directly and say, oh, we, we want to create a series of videos to talk about, like the services that we offer or our team culture or like a simple ad that we’re gonna be putting on a few different mediums, things like that.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I, I hesitated to mention those two letters that go together a lot. Ai. But I think I’ll ask, because we are in, things change constantly. Things are evolving constantly. Yeah. And how do you see the inclusion of ai if a company wishes to go there? 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, totally. I think that there’s I am. I feel kind of neutral in AI in the same way that I feel about social media.

    I think that like social media has opened up so many opportunities for so many folks and has brought things together and also created just this massive slew of problems that no one knows how to do, what to do with it. And AI is very much rapidly doing the same thing. I don’t think it’s, I wouldn’t advise companies to take a strong moral stance of never touching ai.

    Because I think that’s kind of impossible because if they’re not directly coordinating with it, then they’re working with someone who’s directly coordinating with it. And the tools are integrated into every major software now. So Google is ai, all social medias use ai Adobe slack, like everything uses some sort of AI component at this point, just because it is made.

    Like tools of certain software are just so much more powerful. And so I think that when you trust AI to make larger strategic decisions. You can definitely get into danger in a variety of ways. In the sense of it’s going to potentially give you a strategy that a lot of your competition is gonna be doing simultaneously.

    And so it’s not necessarily gonna help you stand out. But then you’re also going to take away the morale from your. Company kind of actually for yourself as a decision maker, you can you’ll get soft in the sense of not really even thinking about what you’re doing anymore. And you’re just entrusting this system to make decisions for you. And then that, I think that really. Destroys your energy as a business owner or a decision maker in a company, and then also that can have that same effect within your team. People don’t feel like their decision is, or their work is really even valuable if everything’s being outsourced.

    But I think AI is a phenomenal tool for rote tasks, for repetitive things that don’t necessarily take a lot of creative input or thinking and you’re like, I’m gonna use this to. Do this process. Like we, we use an AI systems, for instance, to take footage from three different camera angles and two different audio sources, and then just sync them all up immediately.

    Okay. So like when we started the business 10 years ago, like that’s a process. That were, sync clips on a timeline. There is nothing creative about that at all. Like it is a tedious process and you’re just dragging things onto a timeline and you’re making sure that you’re not getting an echo and stuff.

    And having the capability of using a tool to do a process that would sometimes take 30 minutes to an hour in a matter of seconds is. Like, awesome. And it opens up an opportunity for us to do things faster, which means that sometimes that means we can have a higher profit margin, but then a certain project and we can pay our employees more and or it allows us to just sell things for a lower cost, which helps us.

    Build more opportunities for developing deeper relationships with our clients and being able to just give them more with the same investment. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Wow. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, I think that, yeah I think the world is gonna continue to change so, so fast and it’s important to pay attention to that. And, continue to use tools as they develop that, don’t take away your greater strategic thinking.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Indeed. And what I was also hearing is you got an hour back and that could be for your own creative process that’s an hour. For something for you or your employees, your teammates, 

    Erik Croswell: yeah. To 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: get back versus the, yeah. Really tedious, non-creative things. I can see where that would be of great value.

    And yet it’s not making the video. Yeah, it’s not creating the content for the video and I think that therein lies a huge difference because we’re now starting to see things that are a hundred percent AI generated or partially, and it’s nice to see you really thinking about a balance of what’s still authentic and human and creative.

    And yet in the process of creating it, the AI can make things so much better in the actual process of the creation of it. Yeah. But not the content. And that’s good to know. I think people wanna hang on to that and know where things are coming from and know who is the maker and what was the thought process behind it.

    Yeah. It helps us. And what out. In your world and in community, do you see currently as like the downsides of things or obstacles that are in the way? 

    Erik Croswell: I think just the constants of change. I know that there’s a lot of people in the video production space that feel sad about shifting the culture away from.

    Doing a full day shoot with a team of eight people and like a big cinema camera and like really defined roles and multiple takes and things like that. I think there’s this, there’s a lot of this culture around that process and there’s a lot of like specialized roles that people who spent decades really refining and becoming experts in.

    And I think that because of this. Because the barrier to entry to create content is so low now. Like you can get a really nice camera for very cheap, or you can use your phone, you can know, you can use audio tools online to get really amazing audio. Like mostly because of AI innovations. There’s so much less obstacles to enter that the demand for that type of content has just gone way, way down because.

    Essentially you’re having to ask businesses to say do you want something that looks like amazing for like this much, or do you want something that looks like. Super amazing for 10 times that much, you know? And a lot of the time it just, it’s just the natural progression of people can’t justify going from amazing to ultra amazing.

    They’re gonna settle for amazing because they need to make decisions that is best for the health of their companies as well. And so I try to be empathetic to that. While also honoring that there’s the right way to do things, there’s the right way to produce content. Of course you can always like take more and more shortcuts, but finding that balance of process efficiency combined with just genuinely creating an empathetic, thoughtful story that.

    Understands business and tells a narrative that is connecting. I think it’s really important to find that middle ground. And I think that a lot of the hurt that I see within our industry is it’s both a combination of this rapid change in demand because of disruptive technology, but.

    Also it is a big culture of people who are very defiant of it changing as well. Yeah, I think in any industry, like things are going to continue to change and it’s always worthwhile to stay critical of things while also not being, not being blind to a reality that, things are gonna continue to shift much and there’s, that’s gonna be outside of our control.

    But just because things shift doesn’t mean that we have to forego our values. We can stay too true to our values and then just adapt the tools with how we use them. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Well, that’s beautifully said. And it’s also, the word content reminds me of a couple of other words that are, have become so ubiquitous that what does that mean?

    Because there’s content everywhere. Any time of day we could get thousands of either reels or any type of content, whether we want them or not. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: and it sounds like you certainly see the value of really rising above noise. And still being able to. Cut out a portion of time for people to see a genuine, true, good story that is good for both sides.

    It’s good for the company that is hiring you to create that and for those consumers to really understand and make that connection. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And that takes time, that that’s not done on a TikTok video very, very often. And, but it’s, it still, I think, brings it down to people in the end. I think do appreciate content that is meaningful when they’re looking for something or when they’re in that space in their head, when they need to find out more, am I gonna do business with, am gonna work with, am I going to support, am I gonna advocate am I gonna go this direction?

    To have something that, that really makes them feel confident. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: So content is one of those words. And what makes you optimistic? 

    Erik Croswell: I actually, I feel really optimistic about, I’ve noticed a shift in,

    I feel like I’m seeing less fatalism in the community. And I think that’s something that’s very important is I think we’ve been through a lot of, like the last yeah, the last, almost 10 years now has been this mass, like just this insane influx of doom and surprise and dismay and, like this, almost like anti progression.

    And I think that there was such, this like influx of, okay, well we’re all screwed anyways, so what’s the point? And I think that enough time has passed now that people have seen even through and through there’s a lot of cool things happening. There’s a lot of like great progress that’s happening.

    There’s a lot of people showing up for each other and caring and innovating. In really meaningful ways, and that effort is so worthwhile and it shows that with. Enough time and with enough intention for helping others that like that impact versus this ideology that like, eh, whatever. I’m not gonna try anyway.

    Like, we’re all screwed anyway. Like I think people at this point have had enough experience within their own lives of seeing the difference between one versus the other. That they feel more of a sense of being critical of the bad things that are happening in the world, while also saying. And let’s keep doing something about it.

    I don’t know if that just happens to be something that I’ve noticed because I’ve just gotten older, and maybe that’s more so the community that I’m around versus when I was younger. But I really have noticed a shift in that narrative especially within the city of Portland. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And that encourages me too.

    That makes me optimistic because.

    It really is encouraging that we have longevity and that things will change and can change. And if we’re activist about it or at least optimistic about it and helpful about it, it can make a big difference. So that’s encouraging. What you don’t have to name a company, but if there was a. A company you’d really like to work with or a sector that you’d really like to work with, what would it be?

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. I’d really 

    like to work with, I like anything that I really like working with any type of company that is innovative with energy. So I think it’s really cool, like wind energy, solar energy just like geothermal energy any type of company like that. I think there’s so much progress that’s happened over the past like decade.

    And it’s just been so cool to see how technology has shifted things in that realm. I strangely get really excited to work on like agricultural projects as well. Like tractors that can like, have high powered cameras and computing systems in there to understand exactly what type of care to.

    Like a specific crop, I think there’s so much like innovation that we just don’t even think about or see. And so it’s really cool to go out to spaces like that with a camera and showcase that. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh I hope you do because I’ll watch. Yeah. Just for the fun of it. So is there anything else you’d like to say before we have you drop your website verbally and it is in the show notes.

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. Yeah, I 

    think that I’m always just like such a proponent for, I love small business. I love like the culture of believing that you can do something and you have a skillset that you want to bring to your community. I think that the Portland like benefit corporations for good.

    Group is just so amazing. And B Corp’s very amazing as well. I think it’s such, it’s been such like a welcoming community and you can learn so much from people and I think if you just genuinely if you’re a small business and you’re just like curious about what to do next, like just asking people for some advice.

    Like people will just want to give you advice. I don’t think you necessarily have to do all these really specific steps and hire a marketing agency and hire a coach and hire all of these things. I think that as a first step, just reach out and talk to people and say that you admire the business that they’re running and you’d love to just.

    Ask them some questions about what they’ve learned and like what advice that they might have. You’re gonna get a lot of people that well, like that’s not an annoying thing to ask. You’re gonna get a lot of people who genuinely want to share those types of insights. So yeah and I’m, I always think it’s just, it’s so important to do things in a specific order.

    You don’t necessarily need we like to say no to people a lot when it comes to video. They’ll come to us for a video project and we’ll say, oh, you need to like, think about your consumer a little bit more. And in the sense of if you created this video, how do you think this would actually like, connect with them?

    Do you have your distribution channels like set up for this? Are, if you’re planning on. Editing your website six months from now, wait until after you do that to do a video. There’s all those types of steps, which I think are really important and I’m thankful to have a lot of that insight, but also there’s so many amazingly intelligent people in this community.

    And they’ll be happy to share those insights with you as well. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: I think you’re right. And that’s going back to the first thing I said about your business acumen is so strongly about how pragmatic you are about things like that. And. The worst marketing is the expensive stuff that nobody cares about or sees or doesn’t connect with.

    And yeah, so that ability to do all that groundwork and figure out who is the customer, what do they resonate with, where are they? And it’s not about us, it’s about them. And it’s not about what I think or the companies you work with think as much as it’s about how is that connection? And it goes back to those two thirds of.

    Consumers are out there. And they’re out there for you and me and all the companies. So how do you connect that dot or, what’s the straight line between two points? How do you get to ’em? I think your videos are a big part of that, because you’re doing a good thing by suggesting the timeline, the sequence, and the acumen to do it.

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Otherwise. People waste a lot of money on marketing because marketing is intended to do one thing, and that is draw people in and if it doesn’t, it just is very expensive. Yeah. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, I warn people against marketing all the time as a marketing company. Yeah. I think there’s a lot of bad actors in this field, unfortunately that are after just quick bucks, but but the good ones stick around and I think that working with folks that are part of the communities that you’re part of I think that’s, at the very least, it’s a good place to be in the sense of you should have trust in the people that are in the community that you’re a part of because they want to have a good long-term relationship with you there. And, they’re, hopefully people aren’t trying to screw each other regardless, but I think they’re especially not going to, if, they’re like actually part of the same group.

    Kim Allchurch Flick: And I concur with you. I think we both see and give and receive that kind of community support through BCFG. Be local and more, and sometimes just out there in the community and small business is super important that in Oregon small business collectively is the driver of the economy.

    That’s, it’s a really big deal. I don’t 

    Erik Croswell: believe that. 

    Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: So what’s your website? 

    Erik Croswell: Website is bridge city media.com. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Bridge city media.com. And I love the logo. It’s one of Portland’s iconic bridges. And the last question is. If you could have dinner with anyone living or dead up to a table or of four or individually, who would they be or who would that person be?

    Erik Croswell: Yeah I would talk to four, including myself. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yes. 

    Erik Croswell: Cool. I would choose Jane Goodall, Steve Irwin. And Barack Obama, 

    I think I’d love to be at the table with all of them. And yeah, I think I’d love to just have a conversation about ecology and pursuing what you believe in and living boldly while also being able to have the insight and lens of.

    A leader who is in a was in a really tough position and has to make like sometimes really awful macro decisions on behalf of the world. And like, how do you balance like all of that knowledge and that insight while trying to do the right thing. So I think that would be a really cool.

    Blend of perspectives. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Oh, wow. Oh those people are amazing. And thank you. I think I feel really blessed that one of Jane Goodall’s last talks was in Salem in 2025. And we heard that, and what a profoundly resonant human being. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: She started a lot, but another thing that really stood out to me.

    She was talking about how the only way she felt she could really break through sometimes, especially in destructive destruction of the rainforest by large corporations, was to work with them. And she said she had a lot of detractors who’d say, why would you even talk to those people? And she said, because somewhere in there.

    They have someone in there has a heart too. And if I can cross a bridge and get some understanding that they can still do things, run their company, and yet what would be the value of a stronger ecosystem, stronger villages, stronger humanity, where they’re working. And that really resonated because she had the wherewithal to see that sometimes.

    You have to sit across the table from someone you don’t like. Yeah. Or someone with values you don’t like, or someone with methods that you don’t like and try to actually have a conversation. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Yeah. I love that you brought up those three people. That’s pretty amazing. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah. 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: Well, Erik Croswell, you have an amazing heart of gold and also super talented and thank you.

    I love that we’re in the same community. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, likewise make 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: you make people smile. I think you make things better. Thanks for being, thank you, Kim. 

    Erik Croswell: Yeah, 

    Kim Allchurch Flick: thank you everyone. 

    Erik Croswell: Thanks much. 

    This Episode’s Guest: Erik Croswell

    Eric Croswell of Bridge City Media is smiling and looking at the camera. There is photography equipment and a directors chair in the background.

    Erik is a video producer and content strategist that runs Bridge City Media. A decade into his small business, his company has worked with hundreds of companies on creating promotional and informative videos with a specialized focus in social enterprises. As a B Corp, he wishes to use the company to inspire positive change in the world.